The sub-committee on June 29 recommended that the government revisit a range of what it describes as “contentious clauses” and “take relevant stakeholders on board”. It is of note that the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) chose not to attend the sub-committee meeting. It is also of note that the Senate has of late been acting as a handbrake on some of the more dubious attempts to impose restrictive legislation by the current dispensation. Four sections of the Bill — 18, 21, 22 and 28 — are particularly contentious and have been debated in the lower house, but the Senate sub-committee has now asked stakeholders to present their proposed amendments in order that it can finalise its recommendations and present them at the next sitting of the Senate.
The Cybercrime Bill is little more than a Trojan Horse for a range of measures that, within the context of a poorly-drafted piece of legislation, is designed to give the government a variety of sticks with which to beat anybody and anything, including the print and electronic media as well as the many millions nowadays that use the internet, if they say or do anything that displeases the powers that be. Basic freedoms of speech are at hazard, and we support any and all methods by which they may be protected.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 2nd, 2016.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ