After the Baldia fire

Discovering the how and the why of their deaths has been a tortuous process


Editorial February 24, 2016
PHOTO: AFP

On September 11, 2012, the Ali Enterprises garment factory caught fire and 259 workers died. Discovering the how and the why of their deaths has been a tortuous process, but a clearer picture is beginning to emerge though whether the victims and their relatives will ever get justice is far from clear. A Joint Investigation Team (JIT) was constituted and the Punjab forensic team joined the investigation in October 2015. What has emerged is a tangled picture of intimidation, bribery and extortion on the one side, and gross negligence on the other. Perhaps unsurprisingly, there is a strong political thread emerging, and we may now be clear that the 259 who died did not die by accident. It must be noted that the investigation in the immediate aftermath of the fire concluded that it was an accident. Presumably, the status of that conclusion has now been invalidated — and if not, then it should be.

The forensic team established that the fire had a number of different sources, indicating that it was deliberately set using a chemical accelerant, and the JIT has identified nine key suspects, all belonging to the Muttahida Qaumi Movement and is seeking permission to arrest them. The owners of the factory have fled to Dubai and refused to return to Pakistan, but they were interviewed on-camera in the Pakistan Consulate in Dubai. It is clear that a criminal act of monstrous proportions was committed. It is now for the appropriate agencies to prove the case in a court of law, presenting the evidence and allowing judgment to be made. With all the suspects including those named in the JIT report living abroad, an early dispensation of justice seems unlikely. Yet again, the crossover between politics and violent crime is exposed and the losers, again, are the common people who are trying to make an honest living. Perhaps the only saving grace is that the JIT did finally expose something that is close to the truth — but one wonders who it was that allowed the accused to slip the net.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 25th,  2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (1)

S.R.H. Hashmi | 8 years ago | Reply The killing of even one innocent person is tragic, more so when he happens to be the bread-winner for the family. And here we are talking of the killing of 259 persons, which is a barbarity the perpetrators of which must be given exemplary punishment. But before we can do that, matters have to be proved in a court of law. Unfortunately, the report raises more questions than it answers. How come that the investigation report immediately after the accident declared it to be an accident, whereas the present investigation finds it to be a deliberate act, by nine culprits, all belonging to Muttahida Qaumi Movement. One could expect slight variation in details as to the findings but this fundamental change is somewhat incomprehensible. Some years back, a press report stated that a senior official gave an adverse report about certain kind of railway engines, declaring these to be faulty and totally unsuitable. Still, the engines were imported and surprise, surprise, the same officials produced another report, this time singing praises for the engines. Either that or it was the other way round, with him recommending the engines first and condemning them later. And that unfortunately means that in our beloved country, the investigation reports do not always have much relevance to the actual facts but depend more on the mood of the persons who want the report. And given adequate briefing, and an amenable team of experts assembled, just about any conclusions can be drawn. The only snag is that at times such a reports may be difficult to prove in the court. But then, it does not always come to that, more so when such reports are prepared not to honestly probe the matter and to punish those found guilty, but only to do a media trial. There are also other matters. While the fire was indeed the primary reason for the tragedy, the very high casualty figure was caused by peoples’ inability to escape, as well as some other factors. 1.Like factories are requited by law to have some fire-extinguishing facilities on the premises, while emergency exits must also be provided. Moreover, government Inspectors are requited to visit the factories and see to it that the requirements are met. However, it was reported in the press that a high state officials had ordered the Factory Inspectors not to inspect the factory premises because the administration found it very annoying. 2. It was also reported in the press that rather than facilitating the escape of the workers, the factory owners had locked the doors and forced the workers to save as much of their merchandise as possible, instead of saving their lives. 3. And there is the customary inadequacy of the government fire extinguishing facilities, like unavailability of foam and using water which can initially spread rather than extinguish the fire. There are other inadequacies as regard equipment, training etc. So, it is obvious that the guilt spreads far beyond the nine persons, all belonging to a party unpopular with the establishment, and that itself raises some questions, which is the mildest way of putting it. Karachi
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ