Two ‘MQM workers' get 14-year jail term for possessing arms, explosives

'Cockroach' and 'Tidda' claim innocence and insist they were falsely implicated in the case


Zubair Ashraf February 16, 2016
Although the suspects claimed innocence and insisted that they had been falsely implicated in the case but they failed to prove it before the court. PHOTO: FILE

KARACHI: Two alleged workers of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) were awarded collective prison terms of 14 years by a south district and sessions court in Karachi on Tuesday.

Additional District and Sessions Judge Sikandar Amir Panhwar found Naeem, alias Cockroach, and Farhan, alias Tidda, guilty of possessing illicit weapons and explosives.

MQM worker indicted for Waqas Shah’s murder

Both the suspects, who are said to be workers of the Karachi-based political party, were arrested in March 2013 from the city’s Orangi Town area during an intelligence-based raid.

During the trial, the court examined a number of witnesses, most of them policemen, who testified against the suspects. However, the suspects claimed innocence and insist they have been falsely implicated in the case.

“The prosecution successfully proved its case beyond any shadow of doubt,” the district and sessions judge observed in his judgement. The convicts were awarded seven years for each of the offense -- keeping illicit weapon and explosives.

Preventative detention: Rangers detain four MQM workers on terrorism charges

The suspects, who remained under police detention since their arrest in 2013, have already completed three years of their sentence, and have the right to challenge the decision in the Sindh High Court.

COMMENTS (3)

touseef | 8 years ago | Reply How can a court verdict on the basis of testimonies of Police officials? Everyone knows about police ethics
bash gul | 8 years ago | Reply Wasn't the jail term for illegal weapon possession raised to 13 years?
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ