Saudi-led coalition denies using cluster bombs in Yemen

Report by Human Rights Watch quotes residents describing January 6 attack consistent with airdropped cluster bomb use


Afp January 10, 2016
Smoke billows as supporters of exiled Yemeni President Abedrabbo Mansour Hadi clash with Shia Huthi rebels on the outskirts of the Taez province, on May 3, 2015 PHOTO: AFP

RIYADH: The Saudi-led coalition bombing rebels in Yemen denied Sunday renewed accusations of dropping cluster bombs in the country after UN chief Ban Ki-moon said their use may be a "war crime".

The coalition "denies using cluster bombs in Sanaa", the Yemeni capital, spokesperson Brigadier General Ahmed al Assiri told AFP.

Saudi-led coalition using cluster bombs in Yemen: HRW

He was specifically responding to a report issued Thursday by the US-based Human Rights Watch, which quoted residents describing a January 6 attack consistent with airdropped cluster bomb use.

A day later Ban said he had received "troubling reports" of cluster bomb attacks in the rebel-held capital Sanaa.

"I think it's a very weak report," Assiri said of HRW's study. "They didn't show any evidence."

He said the watchdog mentioned a type of cluster munition "that doesn't exist in our stock," adding that 90 per cent of coalition operations in Sanaa are directed against Scud missile launchers.

Iran accuses Saudi of air strike on Yemen embassy

 

"You cannot use a cluster bomb against Scud launchers," Assiri said.
There has been widespread international concern about the high numbers of civilian casualties in Yemen.

The Saudi-led coalition has been supporting Yemeni forces since March against the rebels and their allies, who seized territory from the internationally-recognised government.

COMMENTS (1)

Stranger | 8 years ago | Reply Wow cluster / carpet / inter continental bombs / rockets / missiles what not ... Wish they showed just 10 % of these intellect in something constructive .
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ