The problem of poor nutrition is complex and links to a range of other problems that have a synergetic circularity, each feeding into the other as a perfect storm of dysfunctionality. Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, commenting on the report, said that meeting the nutritional needs of many millions meant that agriculture had to be made to be more pro-poor — a statement of the blindingly obvious if nothing else. And here is the rub. For that to happen, there needs to be a linkage between farm and non-farm sectors and particularly through agri-business and, crucially, the provision of basic health and education facilities. Without especially the latter items, the farm and non-farm sectors are not going to develop diversity and employment, thus reducing poverty and — hopefully — nutritional values at the same time as reducing food insecurity. Basic health and education facilities are deficient or absent across much of rural Pakistan and according to the NEC, the immediate sticking-plaster solution is to import more wheat, which will be supplied at subsidised prices to those that are the most food insecure. All very well but not sustainable. The finance minister has proposed “a comprehensive social protection system” with improvements to health and education services at the core — but we have been here before. Improving either is dependent on improving power provision and water, to say nothing of political will, which is far from guaranteed. A lot of people are going to be poorly nourished into the foreseeable future.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 23rd, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ