The cleric is seeking to revive his campaign to enforce Shariah law — or his own version thereof — nationwide, but his call for his followers to rally at Lal Masjid produced a thin crowd which was closely managed by the city administration and thankfully, there were no untoward events. It is plain that despite being on the ‘fourth schedule’ of the ATA, the Maulana is free to do much as he pleases, and the state chooses to allow him to do that. He and his ilk — he is not alone and there are many others — consequently dominate and own the narrative; the dialogue that goes on day-to-day between the various individuals that sway public opinion and the collective subconscious. Let us be under no illusion, the state has chosen not to construct a countervailing narrative to that of the extremists. True, there have been moves against some preachers of hate speech under the National Action Plan (NAP) and true some funding for extremist groups has been interdicted; but as to constructing and then nationally rolling out a counter-narrative to extremism, there has been nothing beyond a ringing silence. Until that silence is broken, extremism will hold powerful sway, and that with the unspoken support of the state itself.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 16th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (1)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ