2018 World Cup: Blatter claims hosts chosen before vote

Says there wouldn’t have been problems had US won 2022 rights


Afp October 29, 2015
FIFA's suspended President Sepp Blatter. PHOTO: AFP

PARIS: Sepp Blatter has claimed there was a deal to give Russia the 2018 World Cup before voting took place, and blamed “bad losers” England and the US for the corruption scandal engulfing the organisation.

“In 2010, we [FIFA’s 22-strong executive committee] had taken a double decision, we were agreed to go to Russia [in 2018], then in 2022 we’d return to the US,” the outgoing FIFA president told Russian news agency TASS.

If the US had won the right to host the 2022 World Cup, “all we’d be talking about now would be the marvellous 2018 World Cup in Russia and not about any problem at FIFA,” he said.

Blatter blames FIFA crisis on Platini, 'bad losers'

Blatter’s comments prompted the head of the English Football Association Greg Dyke to say he would look into recouping around £21 million spent on England’s failed 2018 bid.

Dyke said investigating the claims was a “good idea” as it would be “very nice to get taxpayers’ money back.”

In further revelations, Blatter hit out at UEFA President Michel Platini and former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, saying they skewered the 2022 plan by cosying up to eventual hosts Qatar.

Seven candidates in running for FIFA presidency

Everything changed, he added, “after talks between Sarkozy and Qatar’s prince [Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad bin Khalifa alThani] who is now running the emirate” — a meeting followed by lunch between the two men and Platini.

As a result of that Franco-Qatari summit, at FIFA’s secret ballot in December 2010 “four European votes deserted the US and the result was 14-8 [to Qatar]”, he said. 

Published in The Express Tribune, October 30th, 2015.

Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

 

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ