Veiled voters protest at Canada polling stations

My aim in wearing the niqab to vote is to denounce the inequality between men and women in Canada, said Leclerc


Afp October 20, 2015
My aim in wearing the niqab to vote is to denounce the inequality between men and women in Canada, said Leclerc. PHOTO: REUTERS

MONTREAL, CANADA: Voters in Canada's Quebec province showed up at polling stations in veils Monday to protest a court's recent quashing of a widely-supported ban on the niqab.

In the Montreal suburb of Saint-Hubert, Catherine Leclerc cast her ballot covered head to toe in a black niqab.

"The niqab is not a religious symbol, it's a political symbol, a symbol of the oppression of women, that we should not tolerate in an egalitarian society," she said as she exited a polling station.

Niqab ban is hot button issue in Canada election debate

Several other women in Quebec cast ballots in the Canadian legislative elections wearing potato sacks over their heads and other face coverings, including one who wore a welder's mask.

Opposition to the niqab flared up last month after a court struck down a ban on wearing the veil during citizenship ceremonies.

Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper pledged, if elected, to reinstate the prohibition supported by more than 80 per cent of Canadians.

New Democratic Party leader Thomas Mulcair, meanwhile, lost key support in Quebec province over its opposition to the ban, falling from first to third place in the race.

"My aim in wearing the niqab to vote is to denounce the inequality between men and women in Canada," said Leclerc. "Women fought in Quebec to be free," added Martine, another voter.

She told AFP that a woman wearing the niqab communicates to others that she is "defeated and against our values."

COMMENTS (1)

Stranger | 9 years ago | Reply Sorry ladies at least show me your faces . how else would I know its a man or a woman under those niqabs or hijabs.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ