More safeguards before India uranium exports: Australia review

Report says checks by renowned bodies indicate nuclear safety standards in India were "not as high as they should be"


Afp September 08, 2015
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi with Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott. PHOTO: AFP

SYDNEY: Australia should not sell uranium to India until the South Asian giant establishes an independent nuclear regulator, a parliamentary committee recommended on Tuesday, as it called for more safeguards on a landmark energy deal between the two countries.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi inked a long-awaited pact for Australia to sell uranium to India in September last year, in a bid to ease the country's power crisis and help provide clean energy to its population.

Australia is the world's third-biggest uranium producer and the parliamentary report said the domestic sector would enjoy a huge boost if the agreement is ratified, with the industry and the number of people employed in it doubling in size.

Export revenue would also increase by an estimated Aus$1.75 billion (US$1.22 billion), the report said.

But the treaties committee, which has a majority of members from the governing Liberal-National coalition, added that certain measures should be implemented to strengthen safeguards and nuclear non-proliferation.

The recommendations include Canberra helping India to "make genuine disarmament advances, such as signing the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty".

It also noted that recent checks by renowned bodies indicated that nuclear safety standards in India were "not as high as they should be".

"Because of this, the committee has recommended that Australian uranium not be sold to India until the Indian government has established a nuclear regulator with statutory independence and safety inspections of Indian nuclear facilities that meet best practice standards," the committee said.

It said other concerns — such as the tracking and accounting of nuclear material so it would not be diverted for military use — had been addressed by the government's safeguards agency ANSO, which monitors the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Canberra had long refused to export uranium to India as it has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It reversed its stand in 2012 as it sought to improve ties with the growing nation.

India is heavily dependent on coal and has been struggling to meet rising energy demand as the economy booms and the middle class expands.

COMMENTS (5)

Wajahat Khan | 8 years ago | Reply A defence research group, IHS Jane’s, has revealed that India is increasing its uranium facility that could support the expansion of nuclear weapons. India is trying to buy foreign sources of uranium so she can use its domestic reserves for a nuclear arms race with Pakistan. India is expanding its nuclear power programme to use its own uranium for the production of more nuclear weapons. Adding Australian uranium into India’s energy mix would have serious fallouts on prevailing strained relations between India and its nuclear-armed neighbours. Can Australia trust India to not use Australian uranium for weapons manufacture?
Tannu | 8 years ago | Reply The nuclear collaboration between India and Australia may help in making it to satisfy its ever increasing lust for nuclear power but it can never bring India to a point where it can say for enough,,rather its eagerness and hunger for nuclear power would increase day by day. Secondly Australia being party to NPT must not go for violations. The step towards cooperation with India in the nuclear domain would again bring the NPT to a point of violations and discrimination. Already the treaty is dented and is not fully implemented due to the member's violations and disqualification of the treaty according to the demands of the states.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ