The difference: Rodgers hails match winner Benteke

Belgian striker scores Liverpool’s only goal on home debut against Bournemouth.


Afp August 19, 2015
Benteke celebrates after scoring his first goal for Liverpool after signing from Aston Villa for £32.5 million in the summer. PHOTO: REUTERS

LIVERPOOL:


Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers backed new signing Christian Benteke to transform his side’s play after the former Aston Villa striker’s goal secured a 1-0 victory over promoted Bournemouth.


Benteke struck the only goal of the match in the 26th minute at Anfield on Monday, prodding home a cross from Jordan Henderson in front of the Kop, and the goal stood despite Philippe Coutinho appearing to have been offside.

Liverpool adopted a more direct approach now that Benteke is in the team and Rodgers is hopeful that the £32.5 million Belgium international’s muscularity and awareness will help solve the chronic goal-scoring problems that plagued his team last season.

“I thought he was a real handful,” said Rodgers. “I think you’ve seen all the facets of his game. His hold-up play is outstanding and he’s got a wonderful touch for a big guy.”

The Liverpool manager was understandably singing his striker’s praises after the match. “He can help the ball on into areas, he can take the ball in, control the game, switch the game. His touch is good. You see him linking and combining,” enthused Rodgers.

The 42-year-old also highlighted the added dimension Benteke brings to Liverpool’s attack. “There was one moment when the ball came into the box, which was one of the reasons we looked to bring him in,” he said. “Because of his strength and power, he tried to make contact with it, and we had a chance with Coutinho to shoot. In my time here, that’s never really happened.”

Victory built on Liverpool’s 1-0 win at Stoke City and went level on points with Manchester City, Leicester City and Manchester
United at the top of the early-season standings with six points in six.

But it came at the cost of an injury to new captain Henderson, who departed early in the second half with a foot problem.

As well as Benteke’s goal, Bournemouth were also aggrieved that captain Tommy Elphick had seen an early header ruled out for a foul after he was adjudged to have clambered over Dejan Lovren.

Arriving at his post-match press conference, Bournemouth manager Eddie Howe was asked for his thoughts on the goal and shot back: “Which one?”

He added: “It’s hugely frustrating really, especially after the goal being disallowed, so that’s basically a two-goal swing against us.”

Howe was particularly disappointed that Benteke’s goal had been allowed to stand despite Coutinho’s attempt to make contact with Henderson’s in-swinging cross from the left.

New guidelines by rule-making body the International Football Association Board explicitly state that in such instances, the player who attempts to play the ball should be flagged offside and Howe’s exasperation was plain.

“The problem for us as managers was that we felt it [the offside rule] was a little bit grey,” he said. “We were assured that it wouldn’t be and that the rule would be adhered to correctly. The problem tonight is that if that’s not offside, that’s the clearest example that you’ll see of the new rule. I’d like some feedback on both decisions.”

Howe nonetheless took heart from the courage shown by his players and said that the performance would give his side “confidence that we can succeed at this level”.

Liverpool never recovered from losing three of their first five games last season, but despite his team’s steady start, Rodgers was unwilling to look too far ahead. “Last season it was October before we got back-to-back wins,” he said. “To get that in the first two games is pleasing, but we still have a lot of work to do.”

Published in The Express Tribune, August 19th,  2015.

Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ