Taliban commentary raises hope for peace talks

Analysis posted on group's website suggests four points to making the peace process successful

Tahir Khan July 19, 2015

ISLAMABAD: A Taliban commentary raised hopes on Sunday for the fragile peace process to move forward at a time when pressure is mounting on the armed group to declare a ceasefire ahead of the next round of negotiations.

Senior Afghan Taliban leaders and representatives of the government in Kabul sat face-to-face for the first time in 14 years in Pakistan-brokered talks in Murree on July 7. Another round is planned in mid-August, according to Afghan leaders.

Taliban supremo Mullah Omar’s approval of the talks in his “Eid” message and the group’s weekly analysis on their official website could be seen as positive indications that the rare reconciliation process could make progress. However, the process still faces serious challenges from hardliners within the Taliban and elements of the Afghan government.

Read: Mullah Omar endorses ‘political endeavours and peaceful pathways’

Some former Taliban leaders and a few members of Taliban’s Qatar office who are not in favour of Pakistan’s role in the political negotiations could try to derail the process which has yet to gain momentum.

Taliban’s analysis this week has only focused on negotiations, however, it does not directly mention the Murree talks as the Taliban leadership has not yet officially commented on the peace process.

In the commentary, ‘How to achieve sustainable peace in the country?,’ the Taliban do not reject peace talks and give four suggestions on making the peace process successful.

 Read: Afghan peace process: Ghani welcomes Mullah Omar’s endorsement

“Commitment and sincerity are the foremost elements for the peace process. A peace process which is also an Islamic obligation should not be used as a tool for deception, cunning and accusation of the opposite side,” said the Taliban analysis posted on their official website.

“Peace requires deep thoughts and discussions. A minor mistake in peace process could bring in enormous problems to our nation,” the analysis, which be seen as a soft approach towards the recently launched process, read.

“Peace requires serious moves based on realities otherwise it will deteriorate the peace process and pave the way for prolongation of war. Therefore, all the steps should be taken very carefully,” the Taliban said in their advice to their opponents.

Read: Pakistan helped secure Taliban talks, but Afghan mistrust lingers

However, the Taliban analysis warns the Kabul government not to use talks as a media tool. It further urges the government to remove hurdles in the way of peace and establish an atmosphere of confidence and trust.

“An important point in a peace process is the realisation of the sentiments of opposite side. Peace should not be dubbed as surrender. Those who desire peace should not use it as an instrument of propaganda,” the Taliban commentary added.

The Taliban have suggested the Kabul administration to take trust building measures.

Read: Afghan reconciliation: Mullah Omar's aide likely to join peace talks

The High Peace Council’s adviser on international affairs, Esmail Qasemyar, has urged the Taliban to announce a temporary ceasefire to hold the second round of the talks in a suitable and appropriate environment, according to the Afghan media.


Mare | 7 years ago | Reply The talibans should cater and listen to the Afghan Government. Also they should stop killing innocent people.
Carol Grayson | 7 years ago | Reply Yes, these are Islamic Emirate's recent comments in discussion via website and on Twitter but its down to how they define "legitimate" talks and that is not clear. That word legitimate which they use is key... Do they see Murree as legitimate, because only days earlier the words they were using were "hijacked" and "not supporting meetings behind closed doors". They said, "Shahamat English (official Taliban publication) statement of Islamic Emirate #Qatar office rejects participation of any member/s". It is confusing at the moment with no clear cut answers. What is also a factor is that Islamic State now have a presence in the region though Taliban have made their views clear. IS of course have former Talibs in their ranks and their leader in AfPak may not have been killed in a drone strike? Journalists and researchers were sent a 1 hour 5 minute audio tape recently allegedly from Islamic State Karachi, which among other issues discussed Safoora massacre and killing of Sabeen Mahmud. It seems as Waziristan is "cleared", insurgents are moving into the cities. The audio makes chilling listening and IS view those taking part in peace talks as traitors. The question is to what extent will that affect any peace process?
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read