The Big Bang

Is there design in the creation of the universe, or did we come into being due to a cosmic accident

Dr Asad Zaman June 21, 2015
The writer is vice-chancellor of the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics

Is there design in the creation of the universe, or did we come into being due to a cosmic accident? So much hinges on the answer that only ostriches would refuse to face it. If we were created by a random evolutionary process following a chance combination of atoms in a primordial soup, then our lives have no meaning. We live in a cold and callous universe, and all our struggles, passions, sacrifice and devotion make no difference in the end. Contemplating the ultimate futility of all human effort, Bertrand Russell, one of the founding fathers of atheism as a philosophy, said that “only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul’s habitation henceforth be safely built”.

This is in stark contrast to a universe created by God, where the trees and the stars acknowledge their Creator, and the sun and the moon follow exquisitely designed laws. Even an atom’s worth of good that we do will be rewarded, while evil will meet with either the mercy or the justice of God.

Scientists were as firmly committed to the idea of an eternal uncreated universe as believers were to the creation of the universe by God. This being a theological dispute, neither side expected to find supporting empirical evidence for their beliefs. The emergence of convincing evidence for the creation of the universe from nothing was the most surprising discovery of the 20th century.

Einstein’s celebrated theory of general relativity led to the puzzling prediction that an eternal and static universe would collapse to nothingness under the forces of gravitation. To resolve this difficulty, Einstein posited a “cosmological constant”, a force that opposes gravity and keeps the universe from collapsing. Russian physicist Alexander Friedmann and Belgian Georges Lemaitre both independently discovered that if the universe was expanding, instead of being static, there would be no need for this arbitrary assumption, which had no empirical support. Einstein was so committed to the idea of a static and eternal universe that he publicly ridiculed both of these scientists, who were then ignored and forgotten.

Strong evidence for an expanding universe came from observations by astronomer Edwin Hubble that distant galaxies were racing away from us at higher speeds, in conflict with the idea of a static universe. Hubble’s Law not only showed that the universe was expanding, but also that it must have had an origin — a point in time at which it was created. Einstein was so surprised that he visited Hubble at Mt Wilson observatory, and looked for himself before admitting his mistake. He later stated that the “cosmological constant” had been the biggest blunder of his career.

Other scientists were not so easily converted. British scientist Fred Hoyle fanatically strove to develop models of an eternal and static universe consistent with the empirical evidence. He labelled the alternative theories as “irrational and unscientific”, saying that the idea that the universe originated in a “Big Bang” was ridiculous. It is ironic that his term of ridicule went on to become the accepted name of this theory. Scientists strongly resisted the Big Bang because it created uncomfortable questions about who created the expanding universe. The Holy Quran answers this question clearly: “And it is We who created the universe with [Our] power; and, verily, it is We who are steadily expanding it.”

In the meantime, evidence in favour of the Big Bang continued to accumulate. George Gamow had calculated that an explosion which created the universe would leave its marks in the form of a detectible and pervasive microwave radiation. When this radiation was eventually discovered, The New York Times published the news in 1965 as the discovery of the century. A satellite launched in 1989 brought in even more convincing evidence. There were variations in microwave radiation, exactly as predicted by the Big Bang model of the universe’s origin. The famous physicist Stephen Hawking praised it as “the greatest discovery of the century, if not of all time”.

At this time, the universally accepted cosmological model posits the existence of a void — no matter, light, energy, space-time continuum or physical laws. Suddenly, from nowhere, in an explosion emanating from a single point, the entire universe came into existence. Why? Scientists don’t have a clue. Islam, on the other hand, provides an answer: “God said Be, and It is.” 

Published in The Express Tribune, June 22nd,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.


Rex Minor | 5 years ago | Reply @rajesh: On a BBC radio broadcast, Hawking clarified that determining that the universe followed the laws of physics when it began would neither prove nor disprove that God exists—but it does indicate that there was nothing arbitrary about the process. Hawkings does not know that his thesis is backed up by average 15 percent of the potential ciapacity of his brain. phyics To be able to comprehend fully the physics of the universe the humans must also advance in learning about the biological components of their body plus the so called soul. Rex Minor
Rapid | 5 years ago | Reply How can the author of this article come to the following conclusion? "The emergence of convincing evidence for the creation of the universe from nothing was the most surprising discovery of the 20th century." What evidence? And by the way who created this so called GOD, or where did this GOD came from who supposedly created this some kind of magic. It was a good idea to start a " University of Magic " in Pakistan where you can drive to with "Made in Pakistan" magic cars running on water.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ