Pakistan's Mohammad Sami faces probe for hotel brawl

Sami under investigation, accused of brawling and damaging hotel furniture while drunk, says KCCA president.


Reuters December 15, 2010

KARACHI: Pakistani test bowler Mohammad Sami is under investigation after being accused of brawling and damaging hotel furniture while drunk, Karachi City Cricket Association president Siraj Bukhari told Reuters.

"We have been told that Sami fought with a teammate and damaged hotel property while allegedly under the influence of alcohol," he said.

He added a detailed report had been summoned from the Karachi Blues team management on the incident that took place on Tuesday at the hotel in Rawalpindi, where the team is set toplay its Quaid-e-Azam Trophy match.

"We don't know the proper details of the incident and we will only decide on action after getting both sides of the story," Bukhari added.

Sami was adamant he was not under the influence of alcohol.

"I had a misunderstanding with a fellow player but it is not true I was drunk," Sami told Reuters.

Geo news channel reported that the hotel management had also complained to the team management and sought compensation for the damage to property by the 29-year-old cricketer.

The paceman, with 35 tests and 83 one-day international appearances under his belt, has been in and out of the national team and last played against South Africa in Abu Dhabi last month.

COMMENTS (2)

Armughan | 13 years ago | Reply Now that he is officially a bad boy, will he be the next "superstar" who can not be dropped? It is how it works with our board, be a bad boy and get a free ticket on the team bus everytime.
sana | 13 years ago | Reply must've been a great fight. what a gentleman is sami, took it out on the chair instead of the guy he was angry with. a model for the rest of the cricketers to follow, for sure. hope he gets a recall for the new zealand tests inshallah, now that sohail tanvir is out injured.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ