Editorial

Nuclear futures

Pakistan has a nuclear future but has to convince the world it is a responsible custodian of nuclear technologies

Editorial June 07, 2015

The debate is once again active as to whether membership of the NSG can be opened to non-signatory states of the NPT.

Pakistan is increasingly power hungry and will become more so as the economy expands, albeit by fits and starts. Power is generated from a basket of sources — hydroelectric, wind, sun, diesel and coal-fired power stations — and nuclear. The first nuclear power station became operational in 1972 and as of 2012, 3.6 per cent of our energy needs were met by nuclear power, as against 62 per cent from fossil fuels and 33 per cent from hydroelectric sources. The long-term plan is to construct 32 nuclear power plants by 2050. Militarily, Pakistan is one of four nuclear armed states that are not a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty; the others being India, North Korea and Israel. The matter of nuclear power, both civil and military, has again risen to the top of the agenda and there are hard questions to answer and difficult decisions to make.

There is something of a churn going on within our foreign policy orientations, and the game-changer that is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) which is redefining our relationship with China is much to the fore. Within that context, there could hardly have been much by way of optimism on the Pakistan side when we raised the possibility with the Americans of having access to peaceful nuclear technologies in order to develop our own capacity. This was raised in the context of the Pak-US Strategic Dialogue which was held in Washington.

The US Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, Rose Gottemoeller, and Pakistan’s Foreign Secretary, Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, were the co-chairs of the 7th round of the US-Pakistan Security, Strategic Stability, and Nonproliferation (SSS&NP) Working Group on June 2, according to a statement issued by the Foreign Office. As ever, there is little to be gleaned from the official statements that were issued afterwards, which spoke of ‘a productive exchange of views on issues of mutual importance’ and of the need of Pakistan ‘for access to peaceful nuclear technology as a socioeconomic imperative.’ There is no indication that the Americans have responded positively, and the expectation must be that they will not.

Previous applications for support have all been stonewalled, with the Americans citing concerns over the security of our nuclear weapons; a concern which is unfounded not least because it is American consultants, among others, who have provided the security architecture for our nuclear weapons. What may be of more justifiable concern relates to proliferation, and the memory of the AQ Khan fiasco wherein one of our leading atomic scientists shared information with several countries in contravention of non-proliferation protocols. It is of note that America still regards AQ Khan as a proliferation risk. Known unknowns aside, the Americans expressed ‘full confidence’ in our efforts to strengthen nuclear security. Whether we like it or not, the two countries are going to continue to work together — but possibly not as closely as Pakistan is working with China.

The nuclear partnership with China is long-standing. With the 9^th Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) conference now concluded, China has made it clear that although it supports in principle Pakistan gaining access to the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) that support was going no further than ‘in principle’ unless Pakistan signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The debate is once again active as to whether membership of the NSG can be opened to non-signatory states of the NPT. It is ultimately going to be the members of the NSG to reach internal consensus on the matter and there will be no early decision. China is playing its cards close to its chest but it may be inferred that it is ‘in principle’ and as a member of the NSG not averse to Pakistan’s entry/membership. The Americans are unlikely to take a similar view, and India will cry foul as may Russia. Pakistan has a nuclear future, both civil and military, but has an uphill job convincing some parts of the world that it is a responsible custodian of nuclear technologies.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 8^th, 2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (6)

Aani | 9 years ago | Reply nuclear energy is a vital economic security need of the country and that the international community, must recognize Pakistan as a nuclear power and must be given equal rights and responsibilities in this regard because Pakistan is capable of providing nuclear fuel cycle services, under the International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA) safeguards.

Abdul Malik | 9 years ago | Reply Whatever reasons, explanations you may give I do not see Pakistan getting a NSG deal within its lifetime.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS

harkol | 9 years ago | Reply @Rabia: While 'right to equality' sounds like a ideal principle, there is no equality in geo-politics. NPT itself is an discriminatory regime. So are most other nuclear & missile regimes. Ultimately it is the unanimity among top 5-7 nations that will matter. And it is impossible to get US, France, UK and Russia on board to get Pakistan inside the tent - For simple reason: It's past record, it's continued support, justification & hosting of world renown terrorists (Osama being one) & Afghan Taliban (which are as bad as ISIS). Pakistan would gain entry inside the tent only when major countries of the world believe it has turned a leaf.

Tania | 9 years ago | Reply Pakistan maintains a credible minimum deterrence for its nukes. On other hand, it is heading very speedily to achieve the mandate for generating power from nuclear. In order to meet up with growing energy needs, major countries started rely on one of the most efficient and sustainable source of energy which is nuclear. Pakistan is also experiencing acute shortage of power from couple of years and this is the major reason that why Pakistan inclined towards peaceful civilian uses of energy. Its energy mix share an increased portion of nuclear which in turn achieve the mandate of energy security.

Rabia | 9 years ago | Reply While it is, of course, impossible to reverse the Indo-US deal, amendments can be made in recognition of the right to equality for all states. This might help redress the strategic balance in South Asia instead of spending billions of dollars and decades undermining security. Lastly, one must remember that the NPT was intended primarily as a tool with which to stem the horizontal spread of nuclear weapons and is indeed a valuable legal instrument in that respect.

Tazeen | 9 years ago | Reply Pakistan is a nuclear power and it is its sole right to have access to nuclear technology for making its peaceful use. Currently Pakistan is going through a tough phase of energy shortfall and is finding it much harder to feed its masses only by utilizing the available energy resources. Nuclear power is an alternative and a reliable source of power generation which can make the country to make its energy demands fulfilled. Along with this the proliferation record of Pakistan is clear and the country has been observed to be making its command and control structure more stringent with the passage of time along with improving its safety and security structures. Pakistan being a nuclear power can make the best use of it and can also make itself a economically developed nation.

Replying to X