Wars in Pakistan, Afghanistan killed 150,000 since 9/11: Study

Another 162,000 have been wounded since the US-led offensive that toppled the Taliban government in Afghanistan


Afp June 02, 2015
Students at the Army Public School in Peshawar which was attacked in December 2014, leaving over 140 people - mostly children - dead. PHOTO: AFP

WASHINGTON: The wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan have left nearly 150,000 soldiers and civilians dead since 2001, a new US study estimates.

Another 162,000 have been wounded since the US-led offensive that toppled the Taliban government in Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks, says the study by the Costs of War Project, based at the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University.

The war in Afghanistan is intensifying rather than moving towards an end, it added, as the number of deaths and injuries has increased significantly in recent years.

This, and the United States' announcement this year that it is slowing its troop withdrawal, "underscores the fact that the war in Afghanistan is not ending. It is getting worse," said the study, dated May 22.

In Pakistan, the war has seen a lower intensity in recent years although there remains "very hot conflict" in the northwest of the country.



The study focuses on death and injury caused directly by the stuff of warfare, what it calls "bullets, bombs, fire and so on."

War also causes indirect deaths, as people perish due to malnutrition, lack of health care and the hardship of displacement. But this figure is very hard to tally.

For all the categories of direct fatalities and injured -- soldiers, then civilians including journalists, aid workers and civilian contractors -- the study used sources ranging from US and other allied government figures to the UN aid mission in Afghanistan to data bases of NGOs and think tanks.

Author Neta Crawford said studies on wars since 1990s suggest an "extremely crude rule of thumb" to the effect that for every person who dies a direct death in war, three to 15 die indirectly.

But both countries studied this time have been ravaged by military conflict, and in Afghanistan, torn by decades of war, "there is no peacetime baseline," wrote Crawford, the co-director of the Costs of Wars Programme and a professor of political science at Boston University.

So it is nearly impossible to estimate indirect deaths in the two countries, she concluded.

"What we do know is that the indirect health effects of war persist beyond the end of the fighting," Crawford wrote.

"Both Afghanistan and Pakistan will continue to need an infusion of aid for public health after these wars end, a prospect that does not appear imminent."

COMMENTS (5)

Muhammad Solehuddin | 3 years ago | Reply thank you for nice information visit our website https uhamka.ac.id
Stewart J | 9 years ago | Reply @Khan: Will you EVER take responsibility for anything? Islamic State terrorists are Americans? Before you start to play the victim, consider that Timur accounted for over 18 million people to spread his ideology. My point is, war is always ugly and the innocent always suffer.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ