US Supreme Court rules for Muslim woman denied job due to hijab at Abercrombie & Fitch

Samantha Elauf was denied a sales job in 2008 at an Abercrombie Kids store in Tulsa when she was 17

Reuters June 01, 2015
Samantha Elauf (R), who was denied a sales job at an Abercrombie Kids store in Tulsa in 2008, stands with U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lead attorney Barbara Seely (C) at the US Supreme Court in Washington, February 25, 2015. PHOTO: REUTERS

WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Muslim woman who filed a lawsuit after she was denied a job at an Abercrombie & Fitch Co clothing store in Oklahoma because she wore a head scarf for religious reasons.

On a 8-1 vote, the court handed a win to the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), a federal agency that sued the company on behalf of Samantha Elauf. She was denied a sales job in 2008 at an Abercrombie Kids store in Tulsa when she was 17.

Read: US justices show support for Muslim woman denied job due to hijab

The legal question before the court was whether Elauf was required to ask for a religious accommodation in order for the company to be sued under the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which, among other things, bans employment discrimination based on religious beliefs and practices.

Elauf was wearing a head scarf, or hijab, at the job interview but did not specifically say that, as a Muslim, she wanted the company to give her a religious accommodation.

The company denied Elauf the job on the grounds that wearing the scarf violated its "look policy" for members of the sales staff, a policy intended to promote the brand's East Coast collegiate image.

Read: American Muslim woman sues Abercrombie over hijab

Muslim groups said in a friend-of-the-court brief in support of Elauf that employment discrimination against Muslims is widespread in the United States. Often, the act of a woman wearing a head scarf is what triggers the discrimination, according to the brief. The EEOC has reported that Muslims file more employment claims about discrimination and the failure to provide religious accommodations than any other religious group.

Groups representing Christians, Jews and Sikhs also filed court papers backing Elauf.


Harris | 6 years ago | Reply Aww. @Robert Norwood's prejudiced feelings are hurt because a court ruled in favor of a Muslim. So sorry bro, but continue with your stereotypes. Soon you'll fall victim to someone else's generalizations about you. Good day Robby!
Robert Norwood | 6 years ago | Reply @Hassan: Every society has things about it which it is not proud but the difference here is we do not make these things, these aberrations in human behavior, the law of the land in the way Islamic law does. In Islamic countries women are not even second class citizens, they are more like property with very few rights if any in truth. You have avoided the embarrassment of addressing these issues and point out problems in Western society. You fail to address that rapists and pedophiles are punished. Under Islam the victims are punished. I understand you cannot defend that. When muslims have the courage to say "yes, we are like that" then they will find the moral courage to be better, to improve. Honest and decent muslims must live in fear, in fear of Islamic law and the reprisals for following the moral duty of a righteous human being rather than the crimes of Islamic law. I know a bit about Pakistan, many folks from there never want to go back there.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read