On March 9, the IHC had upheld Qadri's death sentence under Section-302 of the Pakistan Penal Code but struck out a terrorism conviction, making it unlikely he will be executed soon. He had challenged his death penalty in the apex court, terming it “illegal and un-Islamic”.
Read: Challenging the death sentence: IHC accepts Qadri’s appeal
Qadri’s counsel, before the three-judge bench in the SC today, argued that his client did not kill Taseer over personal enmity, but for committing blasphemy.
The bench, headed by Justice Asif Syed Khosa, decided that Qadri's petition will be heard in October in the apex court. Khosa remarked that we have to decide in accordance with the constitution.
"If a judge does not decide according to constitution he would be betraying the country," Justice Qazi Faiz Eesi said.
The federal government had submitted an amended appeal against Islamabad High Court’s decision to drop terrorism charges against Mumtaz Qadri, a former police guard who murdered Punjab governor Salmaan Taseer in Islamabad in 2011.
The interior ministry, through Advocate on Record (AoR) Siddique Khan Baloch, filed an eight-page appeal under Article 185(3) of the Constitution, contending that Qadri’s acquittal under Section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) 1997 was not in accordance with the law.
Read: Salmaan Taseer murder: Government challenges dropping terrorism charges against Qadri
“The high court was not right to acquit the convict under Section 7(a) by not appropriately considering the peculiar features of the case, in which the governor of a province, holding constitutional office was murdered mercilessly in a busy commercial area in broad daylight by a person (deputed officially as a security guard) to save and secure the life of the governor,” reads the interior ministry’s appeal, a copy of which is available with The Express Tribune.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ