SC suspends election tribunal's verdict on NA-125

Supreme Court reinstates Khawaja Saad Rafique as Railways Minister


Hasnaat Mailk/web Desk May 11, 2015
PHOTO: DAILY CAPITAL

LAHORE: Supreme Court (SC) on Monday suspended an election tribunal’s verdict pertaining to the re-elections in constituencies NA-124 and PP-155 after irregularities were found in the records of the May 2013 general elections. 

The court also summoned all records of cases from the election tribunal and issued notices to all respondents including Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) candidate Hamid Khan.

Read: Election tribunal rules in favour of PTI in NA-125, announces re-polling

An election tribunal had passed orders for re-polling in NA- 125 due to 'some irregularities' which Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz's (PML-N) Khawaja Saad Rafique challenged in the SC and announced that he would participate in the re-polls and contest elections from the constituency once again.

Read: Election tribunal rules in favour of PTI in NA-125, announces re-polling

During the hearing, Khawaja Haris, counsel for PML-N leader submitted that the tribunal verdict was not in accordance with the law. After hearing his preliminary arguments, the bench suspended the tribunal's verdict and adjourned the hearing for four weeks.

While suspending the tribunal's verdict, the apex court also reinstated Rafique to his post as the railway minister.

In his appeal before the SC, Rafique claimed the decision of the tribunal was based on “mere conjectures and surmises” instead of any material evidence.

He contended that his opponent, PTI's Hamid Khan, failed to provide any evidence of the plaintiff’s collusion with the election staff and could not prove any illegalities during the two years of the tribunal’s proceedings.

Concluding, he termed the conclusions drawn by the tribunal judge “not sustainable in the eye of law” and further claimed that he and his electorates had been penalised for faults of the returning officers and the election staff, who failed to perform their duties efficiently.

Speaking to the media, Rafique claimed that he was targeted by Imran Khan and Hamid Khan.



"According to the decision, all accusations on me have been proved wrong," he said.

"My father has made many sacrifices, being an honest politician is in my blood. and these allegations of rigging and dishonesty have been very embarrassing for me," the PML-N leader added.

Read: Hours after being de-seated, Khawaja Saad Rafique challenges tribunal verdict in SC

Muhammad Hussain, counsel for petitioner Hamid Khan of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, earlier requested the tribunal to set aside the notification and order a re-election in the constituency.

COMMENTS (53)

Naeem Khan | 9 years ago | Reply If any one in Pakistan thinks that political parties are not involved in any vote rigging, they are either naïve or living in the la la land. Would any one believe that these are the same politicians who received tax payers money from ISI to derail PPP elections. Nothing has changed except they got smarter in cheating. It is not who won or lost but it is the nation of Pakistan who has lost at every juncture and no one seems to care. It is amazing to see that the same very Supreme Court of Pakistan which was literally attacked by the PML-N members which also included some of their NA and PA members and now they are depending on courts. One should not forget that the justices of the Supreme Courts had to take shelter to save their lives. But it is Pakistan where the laws of the land only apply to the down trodden and the unfortunate public where as the elite of this country literally get away with murder and mega corruption. I wonder if they will attack the Court again if the verdict goes against their will.
H Chaudhry | 9 years ago | Reply and as some one who has a lot of family in NA 125, if re-election happens, Saad Rafique will win easily again.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ