
Prior to the Garland event, Pamela Geller and her American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) has run campaigns opposing the the construction of an Islamic center and for acquiring advertising space across the country to orchestrate a drive against Islam.
For Sunday's event, Geller had promised a $10,000 award to the person who came up with the best sacrilegious cartoon depicting Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).
The AFDI is listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Read: Two dead, one wounded at Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) cartoon contest in US
The 56-year-old blogger is already a controversial figure and was quick to term the shooting as a ‘war on free speech’.
“This is a war,' Geller wrote on her blog, Atlas Shrugs. “This is war on free speech. What are we going to do? Are we going to surrender to these monsters?”

Geller has spearheaded campaigns to post controversial ads in the New York City transit system since 2010. PHOTO AFP
Sacrilegious drawings of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) are seen as an insult by many followers of Islam, and most recently was cited as the reason for the attack on French magazine Charlie Hebdo which left 12 people dead.
Read: #JeSuisMuslim: Cartoons honouring Chapel Hill victims emerge on social media
According to the views of the mainstream Islamic tradition, any physical depiction of the Prophet Muhammad is considered blasphemous.
A watchdog explains Geller’s work as “prone to publicising preposterous claims, such as President Obama being the 'love child' of Malcolm X, and once suggested that recent US Supreme Court appointee Elena Kagen, who is Jewish, supports Nazi ideology.”
Read: At least 12 killed in Paris massacre
Gellar had a built a media career from the New York Daily Times and New York Observer and lived as a well-off housewife and mother on Long Island.
The controversial campaigner had spearheaded a campaign to restrain construction of the so-called 'Ground Zero Mosque' from commencing in Manhattan and it rapidly became popular among the anti-Islam circles.
Moreover, in recent times, Geller and her associates had sued New York's Metropolitan Transit Authority after the administration did not agree to post on its buses and subways one of four ads taken up by the organisation in 2014 which could incite violence.
According to Judge John Koeltl, while giving a verdict in April, the incendiary ad was actually speech protected under the law.
The article originally appeared on Mail Online
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ