The international price of oil, as indeed for most items that are used globally, is partly determined by actual supply and demand and partly by prediction and expectation. Demand is also determined by economic activity. In the past, I remember reading horrific stories about Brazil destroying hundreds of tonnes of coffee in order to protect the world price; and Holland doing the same sort of thing with its butter. A donation to African and Asian economies was unthinkable. Left-wing writers in Calcutta and Trivandrum often used these examples in their indictment of the evils of capitalism. The US was once the world’s largest producer and exporter of oil and was referred to as its Swing Producer — increasing supply when necessary and reducing supply when required. That is, until 1970, when production had dropped and when the country started to import oil from Saudi Arabia which then became the world’s Swing Producer. There were a few conspiracy theories afloat at the time in Karachi. One went like this: America had plenty of gas tucked away underground in Texas and California but was saving it for purposes of defence. A few decades later on November 27, 2014 at the meeting of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries in Vienna, Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil producer, which headed the cartel that controlled 40 per cent of world production of petroleum, handed over all responsibility for oil prices to the market. The decision was not unanimous. Venezuela and Iran, among others, hotly contested the decision and wanted petroleum production to be curtailed. But they had little effect on the final decision. What this in effect meant was that the US, whose oil production in December 2014 had almost reached the pre-1970 production figure, once again became the Swing Producer.
So, why has this dramatic fall in the world price of oil taken place? Because in 2014 the supply of oil was much higher than demand. Weak economic activity, a fall in demand from China, increased efficiency and a growing switch from fossil fuels to other forms of energy were the main causes. The introduction of car batteries which are being employed for speeds of up to 50 miles an hour also cut demand. A fall in demand from the US helped to create a lot of spare supply. And then there are the Saudis and their Gulf allies which suddenly realised that if they started to play the curtailment game, they would lose their traditional market share. And so wiser counsel prevailed.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 22nd, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (3)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ