No show, no pay: Salaries of PTI’s absent lawmakers stopped

Published: March 19, 2015
Email
PTI chief Imran Khan. PHOTO: ONLINE

PTI chief Imran Khan. PHOTO: ONLINE

ISLAMABAD: 

National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq has said the salaries of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawmakers have been withheld for absenting from the assembly sessions.

While emerging before the media after the National Assembly session on Wednesday, he said he would be left with no option but to take a decision in case any member of parliament moves a motion against PTI’s absent members.

The speaker also said that he would conduct voting over the motion and on having majority votes, the absent MPs would be declared ineligible.

The PTI had resigned from the national and provincial assemblies, except Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, in August last year over allegations of rigging in the 2013 general elections.

However, the decision on resignations got delayed by the intervention of opposition leaders and then due to Speaker’s insistence that he will conduct individual verification to ascertain if members had voluntarily resigned. The PTI says it would not return to assemblies unless judicial commission is constituted to probe the rigging allegations.

“The Speaker has not taken any decision [on resignations] so far and we don’t know what he is up to,” PTI leader Naeemul Haq said while talking to The Express Tribune.

Responding to a question about NA Speaker’s statement, he said “the Speaker can go ahead and take any decision as per rules”.

Haq reiterated the PTI’s stance that his party’s lawmakers would not return to the assemblies unless the government honours its commitment and constitutes a judicial commission.

“We would take a decision after findings of judicial commission are announced,” Haq said, adding that the commission, if formed, would complete its task in 45 days.

While talking about the allegations of rigging in NA-122, the constituency from where Ayaz Sadiq defeated PTI chairman Imran Khan, the NA Speaker said Imran has failed to produce any evidence of rigging against him in the tribunal.

NA-246: Karachi by-polls

“The PTI would contest the by-election from NA-246 and after winning the election our candidate might submit resignation in line with party’s policy,” PTI leader Dr Arif Alvi told The Express Tribune.

PTI has not finalised its candidate for the contest yet. The decision would be taken by parliamentary board of the party, he added.

When asked for justification for standing in election when the party is boycotting assemblies except K-P, Dr Alvi said, “Karachi is going to get free itself from the clutches of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement and we are participating for the sake of people.”

He said the PTI had supported Amir Dogar in by-election in NA-149 against its estranged leader Javed Hashmi. “The PTI had supported Dogar to prove that Hashmi was wrong,” Alvi said.

Sources told The Express Tribune  that the leader of the opposition in Senate Senator Aitzaz Ahsan has been asked to play a role in reaching an agreement over judicial commission between the government and the PTI. PTI’s Information Secretary Dr Shireen Mazari said that her party would take a decision [of returning to assemblies] “when judicial commission is formed.”

Published in The Express Tribune, March 19th, 2015.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (5)

  • pokee
    Mar 19, 2015 - 6:52AM

    PTI is setting an example for rest of Pakistan. The party does what it says: accountability for everyone. Recommend

  • Mar 19, 2015 - 9:10AM

    What took so long? They should not have been paid from the day they
    ‘supposedly’ resigned. Until the matter was decided, one way or the other.Recommend

  • incognito59
    Mar 19, 2015 - 10:29AM

    About time! PTI was a fresh ray of hope and I voted for them my first vote ever! But now totally disappointed :(Recommend

  • NightWish
    Mar 19, 2015 - 11:40AM

    haters gonna hate PTI & IK to support their corrupt leaders …Recommend

  • Blunt
    Mar 19, 2015 - 11:41AM

    Good move. But how about the salaries and benefits enjoyed by PM and other ministers, who are also almost always absent from Parliament?Recommend

More in Pakistan