Cycle bomb, shootout kill soldiers

Paramilitary officials say two soldiers killed and seven wounded in separate incidents.


Afp December 01, 2010
Cycle bomb, shootout kill soldiers

QUETTA: Paramilitary officials said a bomb planted on a bicycle and a shootout killed two soldiers and wounded seven others in separate incidents in Balochistan on Wednesday.

The Frontier Corps (FC) said the exchange of fire took place in the Kechh district of Balochistan province along the Iranian border, where militants had taken refuge in a house.

"One soldier embraced martyrdom while troops killed all five terrorists and recovered arms and ammunition," FC spokesman Murtaza Baig told AFP.

A bomb planted on a cycle exploded alongside a paramilitary patrol in Qalat district, some 160 kilometres (100 miles) south of the Balochistan capital Quetta, killing one soldier and wounding seven, the spokesman said.

Violence has surged this year in Balochistan, which borders Afghanistan and Iran. The province suffers from a separatist insurgency and Taliban militants.

In October, Amnesty International called on Pakistan to investigate the alleged torture and killing of more than 40 Baloch political leaders and activists against a backdrop of Pakistani military activities in the province.

Hundreds of people have died since rebels rose up in 2004 demanding political autonomy and a greater share of profits from the region's natural oil, gas and mineral resources.

COMMENTS (2)

phunal khan | 13 years ago | Reply as i sent my cnic number to the nadara central server on 9888 and i got reply that no, *****-*******-* is not eligible to receiver watan card while many people who live in my village got eligiblity reply to receiver watan card-their cnic numbers.
Ali Baluch | 13 years ago | Reply Baloch are fighting for freedom of Balochistan not for shares out of own resources.Pakistani terrorist army attacked the house and killed innocent Baloch civilians.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ