'Terrorists' do not speak for one billion Muslims: Obama

US President says associating IS, al Qaeda with Islam would be to accept the false narrative they want to put forward

Afp February 18, 2015
US President Barack Obama delivers remarks on countering violent extremism in Washington, DC, February 18, 2015. PHOTO: AFP

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama on Wednesday urged Western and Muslim leaders to unite to defeat the "false promises of extremism", saying they must jointly reject the premise that militant groups represent Islam.

"The terrorists do not speak for a billion Muslims," Obama told a Washington conference on countering radicalism that drew delegates from 60 countries in the wake of a string of brutal attacks in Europe and the Middle East.

Describing groups like Islamic State (IS) and al Qaeda as "desperate for legitimacy," Obama faced down domestic critics who have pilloried him for not describing attacks in Denmark, France, Syria and Libya as the work of "Islamic radicals."

Obama said associating IS or al Qaeda with Islam would be to accept the false narrative those groups want to put forward. "They try to portray themselves as religious leaders, holy warriors."

"They are not religious leaders, they are terrorists. We are not at war with Islam —we are at war with people who have perverted Islam."

Obama told delegates at the three-day conference that the fight against extremism could not be won with military might alone.

Communities, he said, must do their part.

"These terrorists are a threat first and foremost to the communities they target," he said.

He further clarified that no religion is responsible for terrorism, rather people are responsible for violence.


Realist | 6 years ago | Reply @ Muslim population At least 600 million Muslims are extremists. I think Obama is being too generous.
Smacks | 6 years ago | Reply @wb: Smacks of hate. Unwarranted. These were simple population figures.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ