Modi and the visiting president first walked out to the lawn and casually strolled to the edge of a water pool; stood there for a while, and then walked the pathways till finally settling down at a strategically located point for the cameras where the two had their tea or coffee. Even the pouring of the tea by Modi for the president was a fully-loaded act. It was an unadulterated Modi-Obama moment where Modi hoped to be seen together with Obama exclusively, in the same bracket, same frame, and at the same height. He felt pleased to pour out Obama’s tea for him, rekindling the pride of his beginnings even as he hosted the world’s most powerful man. Vintage Modi.
There is nothing casual about this man. He works everything meticulously, not missing a comma or a full stop; nor the intended nuance. Everything he does is aimed at attaining a well-intended objective. Many loudly wished they were there to listen to the chat; to me it was insignificant. What was significant was what was on display. ‘Attention to detail’ is what explains Modi. What do we have in comparison?
Some of what Modi did was cheap, like calling Obama, ‘Barack’, not once but 19 times by one count, failing to evince an intimate ‘Narry’ or Narendra, or some such, in return. The US president remained formal in addressing Modi, as was the wont of the moment. Other than this one faux pas, the visit, to the viewing public, was flawlessly executed; Obama raised to the heavens in the manner of his treatment. (As Obama reached Saudi Arabia, though, to condole with the new king, the passing away of his predecessor, he had to bear his relegation to God, as the king left his guests unattended when the call to prayer was made). I narrate this only to define the difference in how Obama’s Delhi visit was enacted and how it was for him soon back to the real world after Delhi — from Wonderland to Washington Beltway.
Modi is clear-headed; knows what he wants and then works the details to achieve every bit of it. Without such drive, a chaiwala can hardly be expected to rise to be a prime minister. Looking back at the Obama visit, Modi wished India and himself to be seen in a different league. He achieved most of this. India was mentioned in Obama despatches as a global partner; invited to the high table of global geopolitics as Obama enunciated the evolving role for such partners to checkmate a rising China, especially in the South China Sea and in the Indian Ocean; and received American backing for a permanent seat at the UN Security Council. That’s a lot for a three-day workout.
Of course, Modi also gave something in return: on the liability issue where India will find a way around its more restraining laws and around even difficult politics — again to enable America to sell India its nuclear reactors; and, change equity laws to enable foreign investments in the defence sector — again for the Americans to set up their wares and sell even more to India; and in what was left unstated publicly, for India in accepting to rationalise its stance with its neighbours (read: Pakistan) to establish a relationship of maturity and reason. Nothing derogatory. That is how modern interstate relations function, more in the domain of growing inter-dependencies, which create layers of association that at a certain level, and in some fields, are harmonious; and at other levels, competitive, and at yet another level, confrontational. No nation dwells on zero-sum objectives, and that is why it is difficult to define one relationship to be exclusive over another.
What is of essence here is the leadership that India is under at this time and will likely be for the next 10 years. Modi can be pliable where needed, hard-headed where he feels that will deliver what he needs, but at all times, clear regarding both his policy and strategy. When he pushes Pakistan to conform to the demands of new India in leaving out Kashmir from the international agenda, or punish the Mumbai trial suspects before a dialogue can be granted to Pakistan, he works on a well-established plan. Add to it the pressure that he generates on Pakistan through frequent ceasefire violations, and it all adds up in seeking an acquiescent Pakistan ready to concede to an all-pervasive India, which is much larger, much richer and much stronger. Whether he will succeed or not in his design is yet to be seen; so far he has not, but understanding the design for Pakistan is important, especially when it only retorts with pet responses more akin to slogans.
Modi needs to be managed, neither abhorred nor feared; his designs need to be first understood and then contended with smarter designs from the conception table. Again, our responses need not be confrontational but aimed at achieving a favourable political state — not a win, always. Of that, though, there is little space, inclination or time in Pakistan. Pakistani politics is all about domestic politics, even when in government; it is never about governance or administration or policy or something as remote as a vision. There is a gaping hole instead, politics not yet having risen to that level of cognisance. Compare that with Modi’s way of doing things.
What will keep Modi back and his dreams unfulfilled? Of that, too, there is little confusion. In fact, Obama stated that very well. At the end of his stay in India, when addressing a gathering, he reminded India to be tolerant of the ‘other’, of another religion, race or a region, or of another people, because without such harmony and inclusivity, India will barter all its advantages when blinded by ambition to establish, racial, ethnic, religious, regional or global exclusivity. In other words, keep the swords sheathed on Article 370, on the Uniform Civil Code, on Babri Mosque, or in letting people of other religions pursue their religion freely.
Modi’s next stop is China and the signs from up there too are ominous. Both Russia and China seemed to have agreed to support India’s full memberships to both the SCO and the Apec. They also speak of the need for wholesome reform to the UN Security Council — qualified support only for the moment, but getting the two behemoths to move is not insignificant. Pakistan may have its hands full but it will help to keep an eye on its neighbour before the lag is unbridgeable.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 7th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (43)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Mr AVM and all other Pakistan commentators who will write about the Obama visit to India ad nauseum - is it absolutely necessary to repeat the same old same old every day. What is new in your article? How have you increased our understanding - other than reiterating the view that Pakistan remains obsessed with India, and continues to feel the inferiority complex every day, so much so that various noteworthies feel the need to keep writing the same old hogwash every day. Come to think of it, maybe that is why every day the FO of Pakistan keeps reiterating their lines about Kashmir. Maybe they hope that someday it will come true!
Another piece of advice - the longer you keep interfering in Kashmir, or Punjab, or other areas where you feel that you have an opportunity to "avenge" Bangladesh, the more our efforts in you-know-where. And you know who will blink first.
@John B: Sound like a good guy but like many of your other colleagues on this page you need to improve your insightfulness relating to Indo-Pak relationship. When reacting to any authors or comments you need to remain composed and put aside your deep rooted fear of Pakistan. Instead you guys retaliate merely to express your congenital anger . Why cannot you look more reasonable so that others can take good view of you. The AVM is a highly respectable analyst and in fact what he has said in his article should give you some comfort. Where necessary he has praised India and Your PM for good reasons but you guys seem to have it as your duty to spit poison whenever and where ever you find us. But what you do not understand is that your pain-soaked ideas about us only make us feel important and proud. Good wishes
@wb: U need to tell that Uncle Sam & Aunty Brit have uniform civil code and all states including Asian Hawai does not have 370 like law.
About managing Modi & India, it is no longer possible to create proxies within India who will work for alien's enslaving ideologies.
We have a better guy than MODI named MUSHARRAF but misfortunate Pakistanis have arrested him. So SAD!
Great article. A window into Indian mindset
I am against the very idea of Uniform Civil Code(UCC) & removal of Art 370. That said, as a writer who is well informed on India Choudhry Sahib would know that 370 is not written on rock and UCC is part of Directive Principles of State Policy, as something to aim for, as per Constitution of India drafted before Modi was born & before BJP & its predecessor Jan-Sangh came in to existence. Ambedkar was no lover of Hindutva ideology, to put it mildly, yet firmly believed in concept of UCC. That he was, IMO, in the error, is another matter. I am confident that on both issues Indians will either let status quo prevail or eventually choose wisely.
@Bobb Mack: "Despite having larger army, 8 times more resources India has not been able to neutralise Pakistan…"
Is that the only criteria of success for Pakistan, that inspite of 8 times more resources India has not been able to "neutralise" Pakistan? Have you ever thought - does India want to "neutralise" Pakistan?
How right is Christine Fair in her summation of what Pakistan defines as success - am sure she picked up her impression after talking to the likes of you and apparently there are a whole bunch of you around.
On "... instead you have continued to bleed chronically and that is unlikely to change until you come to your senses and stop atrocities on Kashmirj people." wake up Rip van Winkle and notice that since 2008 India has managed to repel / not have any major terrorist disaster, but in the same period - have you notice what has been going on in Pakistan? - Do you see the bloodletting and the misery on the streets of Pakistan?
Still sure about Pakistan not being "neutralised"?
@jjjj: You can keep bullying or pushing Pakistan but do not cross limits. Indian leadership proved very wise not crossing the line of control during Kargil....the consequences of not doing so would be costly. What you guys always pretend to ignore is the fact how strong Pakistan has become. Despite having larger army, 8 times more resources India has not been able to neutralise Pakistan....instead you have continued to bleed chronically and that is unlikely to change until you come to your senses and stop atrocities on Kashmirj people.
Modi's message is simple and he has been saying it all along "India First". Modi is open to relations with all countries with an honest estimation of each country's strengths, skills, current economic power with the bottom line being how can the other country help India move forward. He first chose to welcome Mr. Nawaz Sharif at his inagural but Nawaz Sharif not being the only power centre was unable to take his country along. Things can change for the better for both countries though.
It is time that Pakistanis take Dabur - Hajmola. Pop a Dabur Hajmola and enjoy the chatpata taste that stimulates your digestive power as well as relieves any heart burn caused by Obama's visit to India.
very good article..i really like the authors writings and his analysis on television..i may not agree with his views all the time but he is sensible than most pakistanis analysist on tv.he is right when he says..modi will be in office for the next 10 years(i bet he will be for the next 15years)...sir india has changed and the indians have changed..earlier whenever we use to see usa,russian or chines presidents we use to wish even india to have such a strong pm and the world respect our pm like others..its not that our previous pm was not good but was not strong like the current one..minde you bjp said UPA govt was corrupt and never said manmohan is also corrupt..pakistan should forget kashmir for 10years and concentrate in cleaning and fixing its own country..
Excellent article....kudos to AVM saab
I'm sorry to say that the author has succumbed to optics and can't see the reality. Moody becoming USA's pet is the best thing that happened to Pakistan in a long while. USA has always conducted their foreign policy through dictators, and dispensed with them once their objectives are met. India is about to go down that same path while Pakistan smartly extricated itself from USA's deathly embrace to align with China, the only superpower that will remain standing in another decade's time.
For once, Pakistan's foreign policy execution needs to be applauded.
I think Pakistani leaders, like those in past , still have enough intelligence left to manage Modi Or not, only time will tell. Its not only a leadership change in India,it is a generational leadership change in India. Next leader will be Modi ++ and so on. More Pakistani experts try to hyphenize with India ,more India will ignore Pakistan to send the message till the realization of the hollowness of claim dawn and ground reality understood.
The author has narrated what everybody knows .. there is nothing new ... everybody knows that Indian PM was a Chaiwala and has risen to the ranks of PM .. which obviously denotes how strong is democracy in India ... Regarding Management of the India PM ... the author needs to introspect about his own country's Management which is shambles .... How can a shambled country and mindset of Pakistan manage some other person or a country ..... Point to ponder Mr AVM ??? Food for thought ... may be ... Empty cartridge are you ???
@katua indian: Thats because India has some hope and people expect something from India. No one gives any lectures to North Korea, Sudan or Pakistan
This is the best government we have ever had after Chandragupta and Chanakya combination. If we had these leaders during the first invasion by the Arabs, we would have never been under the barbarians.
In Politics and Foreign Policy, there can never be friends and enemies, no country can carry such a liability. The distance between India and Pakistan cannot be allowed to grow, lest the gap become unbridgeable. India not talking may suit it but it does not suit Pakistan as with each passing year a stable India becomes stronger, conversely enmity with India making Pakistan much weaker. What India wants is not the Moon, merely good neighborly behavior. Whether that is possible is for Pakistan to decide.
If pakistan want to retain kashmire issue than Pakistan will remain security state and India will push or bully Pakistan at that level only where it will not harm India as it is grown economically and militarily and it will continue to do so without any effect; I think this is long term strategy of India and it is matter of time of how many years pakistan can sustain this pressure for 5 or 10 years.
Good article overall. Couple of wrong statements:
"Add to it the pressure that he generates on Pakistan through frequent ceasefire violations...."
That is the Pakistani establishment line. The truth probably is that it is Pakistan, as per its long established policy, that violated the ceasefire for geopolitical aim of pushing terrorists into Kashmir, as Pakistan has been doing for the past three decades.
"In other words, keep the swords sheathed on Article 370, on the Uniform Civil Code, on Babri Mosque, or in letting people of other religions pursue their religion freely."
That is purely a Pakistani propaganda line. The truth is that Obama, invoking Indian constitution article 25, was speaking on behalf of the Christian Right in America who are alarmed at the possibility that religious conversions by missionaries in India would become more difficult. There has never been any issue for anyone to practice their religion peacefully in India. The issue has always been "forced" conversions through falsehood, misinformation and financial bribing.
Unfortunately for Modi, after the visit Obama gave 2 lectures to the radicals in Modi's party, puncturing the balloon.
Regarding the last sentence (that just about well summarized the whole article), Shahzad sahab... I think that the 'lag' has become 'un-bridgeable' a long time ago ... but of course like a lot of other things your country will always be in denial of the same...
Excellent analysis. Particularly of the fact that how modi planned the minor details of Chai pe charcha. I completely agree with the author that Modi is a Master planner. His plans are executed so swiftly because of the attention he pays to minor details, moreover it seems like he understands how people think and how to handle them appropriately.
Although there is nothing new in this article, it is once again a window to the mind of how PAK establishments think. In all these years of studying India -PaK politics, i am yet to know what is PAK expecting from India. PAK narration of We must keep Watching India fail to answer one important point to PAK citizens. Watch India for what ? And why ?
Has PAK not watching India for the past 68 years? What did she achieve by watching or what did she gain by watching, or what did she learn by watching. It remains me of Cain and Abel story.
The peculiarity of India politics is that whichever party comes to power, their position on international and domestic affairs are the same, but with different methods and they set to achieve their goals. The idea of modern India is unique, which the EU is trying to emulate. This fact seems to escape from all the PAK narration and I wonder why?
If I were a Pakistani and will heed to the advice of article, these will be the questions come to mind.: what am I promised by the PAK for being asked to watch so many PMs of India? All PMs of India did their part very well for India without antagonizing the world. What did PAK PMs and Self appointed Presidents of PAK do to PAK and to the world. What is the contribution of PAK to her neighbors and what is the contribution of India to her neighbors? What is the contribution of PAK and India to the humanity and to the future? And above all, Why I must be upset ,when the US president goes to India and should feel indifferent, if he goes to Mayanmar or Afghanistan or Israel? So many why but I am yet to find an answer other than being consoled that "India is your enemy" . If so, why I don't see it that way?
Presidents and PMs come and go, but people and nations remain, including PAK. Did PAK move forward to the best of her abilities to her citizens on her domestic and foreign policy is the question.
Neither the past PMs of India and the present and future PMs of India are not going to give what PAK calls " the peace and stability of the region depends" :- Kashmir, Sir Creek, Saichen. So, what are PAK plans.? Jihad in India through mullah sermons using India youth?
Quote from this article "Modi needs to be managed, neither abhorred nor feared; his designs need to be first understood and then contended with smarter designs from the conception table." unquote.
Well, good luck to you Pakistanis in your quest to understand, decipher and contend Modi's designs through your smarter designs. But to the people of India Modi's actions are plain commonsense, totally predictable and no rocket science.Awesome and good article..but what i dont like is pakistani media again and again referring to this man as chai wala...every time u spealk chaiwala....this made me think about indian democracy and its people and its strength...that's great....Modi is shrewd and much sharif than ur own sheriff...lol....
Thank you for as very intelligent assessment. India is under a new management. This is not the corrupt, weak-kneed Congress regime where it is trying to pander to everyone. Modi is Honest, Principled, Disciplined and Deliberate. You may not agree with what he is doing and it may not suit you, but his policy is for India not for Pakistan. get used to a new way of doing things.
@author: " ... Modi needs to be managed, ... "
You shouldn't even try.