The best simple explanation of the relationship between Pakistan and the US is the analogy of the first wife and the husband. Pakistan is the faithful first wife, who is always ready to do her master’s bidding, but now the evil husband — the US — has been charmed by the shining India of Modi, the wicked second wife, and does not care about the first one. Anyone watching Pakistani news channels — and they are numerous — during the visit of the US president to India would be convinced of this reality. Programme after programme discussed how shameful it was for Pakistan that the American president was visiting India, but not Pakistan. Several pundits, including the ex-governor of Punjab Chaudhry Mohammad Sarwar, opined that the fact that Obama did not visit Pakistan was a foreign policy “failure”. Many TV shows trashed the Nawaz Sharif government for this debacle and demanded its resignation. Even the terminology we use to explain our relationship with the US gives a dejected first wife feeling. We feel ‘betrayed’ by America time and again despite having done its bidding, but it has not been ‘faithful’ to us. Quite simply, it just sounds like a bad marriage.
Now imagine another scenario: that of President Obama visiting France but not Germany. Imagine German Chancellor Angela Merkel being blasted on all TV channels for not making a US president’s visit possible. Sounds ridiculous? It does indeed to me.
Simply put: Pakistan will not develop as a country and become a stable member of the world comity unless it sheds its India-centric foreign (and even domestic) policy. None of India’s neighbours do it to the extent we do it, and unless we stop obsessing about India all the time, we will never move on. Obsession with India over everything has less to do with our real and imagined threat from India, and more to do with the fact that we have yet to move on from the ‘Partition moment’ and develop an independent identity, which is not tied to India behaving in a particular manner. If a lot of our actions are just reactions to India, and not our independent decisions, we will always be beholden to India and its behaviour. For a country so concerned about its ‘sovereignty’ and ‘integrity’, I am surprised that we are not ashamed of this attitude of ours. The news from India is also not encouraging from our perspective on this count. Since the coming in of the Modi Sarkar, the government has practically decided to ignore Pakistan, and wants little to do with us. Secondly, as evident during Obama’s visit, India is no longer ‘trying’ to become a regional power. Modi’s mannerism and approach to the visit clearly showed that India now assumes that it is a regional power, and that it is now vying for world power and influence. This ‘ignore Pakistan’ policy and ‘moving on’ from regional power games will also have implications for Pakistan and in fact make Pakistan’s stance even more sad and, dare I say, pathetic.
So shall we stop being the miserable first wife of the US and a country obsessed with India, and grow up and develop our country on a sounder, more pragmatic basis?
Published in The Express Tribune, February 7th, 2015.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (40)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Another great article by Mr Bangash! About a week or so ago there was an article in "The Hindu", by a former Pakistan ambassador to the USA, expressing similar sentiments about everything being India-centric and based on India-hatred. It mentioned how Pakistanis, right from school days, are taught to believe that the Hindu India is an enemy trying to destroy Pakistan. In fact, my visit to ET and Dawn websites has become less frequent, having come across the typical Pakistani attitude. I must thank the author for writing a sane and sensible article.
@Noora: Kashmir is not a matter for India growth.India will grow in spite of trouble in Kashmir because India is so huge.India absorbed and can absorb any tremble in coming years.It is Pakistan which is suffering ,will suffer because of the fixation with Kashmir.If you Pakis can understand this logic in earlier then it is better for you and your country health.
@Parvez:
Dear Prevez. It is called international realtions. It is a fact that USA holds the power and it is also a fact that it uses it's power to inflence the balance of power in the world.
@ Sarita Talwai: "Pakistan has great tourist spots , delicious food, talented actors, great writers, fabulous musicians, hardworking and resilient people and the beautiful Sufi tradition."
Is there a parallel world with it's own Pakistan? The Pakistan the RoW sees is quite different from the one described above.
It was a very interesting and entertaing piece to read. Let me remind you young man PTV preceded ITV . Whenever i used to visit my friends in Amtitsar i found them hooked to PTV and wishing India had a leader like Ayub----a statement sometimes echoed by Gen.Cariappa in India.
Pakistan since birth has always regarded India as it's ? enemy. We were fed this at breakfast. Every misery was due to India, USA was always interested in India which it regarded as the big apple. It was only when PM Nehhru stuck on to his non alligned and pro soviet union policy that USA turned to Pakistan and found it a willing partner. Pakistan wanted marriage---"the chosen one" but agreed to be a mistress with the hope of future engagement. Pakistan wanted security and got military supplies in return for giving militatry bases to USA . It signed away it's soverignity to the extent that the foreign minister of Pakistan was barred from entering them!
When India got it's nose bloodied in the conflict with China it convenientally forgot it's non allignment role and asked to be USA mistress . The latter was delighted and offered massive political, moral and military support to the discomfort of it.s first mistress who was asked to keep quiet and not heat up Kashmir dispute against India which was on it's knees. Russia was still India's asset and stood by to help.
Pakistan went looking around for friends and thought it had found one ---CHINA and to get it's favour signed a part away a part of Kashmir under it's control.
Pakistan thought it had done it's home work and entered into a disastrous war with India thinking it's persumed husband USA will back it but no such help came. It was punished for disobeying it's master . The weapons, political support dried up, it's newy found friend made a lot of noise but nothing more and Ayub ended up in Tashkent signing up a peace deal on India's terms.
International relations are never static but dynamic but in case of pakistan they appear to be static. India has moved on and is a wiiling mistress of USA on it's own terms while not giving up it's first love RUSSIA and Now CHINA too is wooing it to pakistan's discomfort. can we see any superpower as our asset?
I could go on with my ranting but as i mellow with age and fade away i often think how GREEN Pakistan could have been if it had not been any body's mistress or as you mention "the proverbial first wife"
@Nikki: on what account?
The question is : Has America been a true caring husband or one looking only for self gratification ? The bedrock of American foreign policy answers that : America has no permanent friends only interests. Completely agree with your view in the end.
Feel sorry for the students he teaches.
Non-Sense topic
All that Mr. Bangash has done with this article is to provide self-obsessed and arrogant Indians an opportunity to gloat.
Pakistan was never the first wife. At best she was a "live-in-partner" and US fathered many pampered ill behaved kids. Poor single mother Pakistan has to deal with these so many ill behaved kids. These kids are creating trouble not only in the neighborhood, but all around the world. Indian elephant is too big a prey for the American eagle.
Completely untrue and false. Pakistan and India do not need to have any relation at all. Pakistan doesnt need us and we dont need them
Even in 1950s, it was India which was USA's first preference and it was Nehru's nonalignment policy which made the USA look for a mistress till it could marry its lady love. And Kennedy was very happy when India took the help of USA during the War with China, but Nehru again shifted back to Non Alignment in a few years.
" The first wife syndrome" +++++++++++++++++ And what about extra marital flings of the First Wife in China and Saudi?
" The first wife syndrome" +++++++++++++++++++ The first wife has not been loyal nor faithful and extremely greedy.So a cooling offf was inevitable.
If Pakistan stops obsessing with India then what is the disposal of 8 lakh standing army with mammoth budget? Will they be hard working farmers if Pakistan cut it's strength by half?
It seems that you want to give a free pass to India for all the bad deeds against Muslims and Pakistan. Sorry, but I can not forget Indian atrocities against Muslims throughout the country, Indian army's subjugation of Kashmiris and attack on our soldiers.
The day we ignore the pain of our Muslim brothers and history of atrocities, that day we will not be Pakistan. There is a reason why Quaid wanted to break off from India. Pakistan is suppose to be a Islamic country for Muslims value and voices.
The desire to be unIndian is one of the reasons for this tragic angst. If Pakistan views itself as a part of the Indian subcontinent and not as a fractured part of Hindustan the wounds will start to heal. Pakistanis have been cruelly uprooted from their past in the effort to be different from India to justify the Two Nation Theory. It is really time to move ahead. Celebrate the similarities you share with us and rejoice in the differences, but do not make it the purpose of your existence. Pakistan has great tourist spots , delicious food, talented actors, great writers, fabulous musicians, hardworking and resilient people and the beautiful Sufi tradition. You can carve a special niche for yourself in this world if you stop trying to be the opposite of India.
As for being the second wife, India is aware that the first wife is a responsibility that never goes away.
"Since the coming in of the Modi Sarkar, the government has practically decided to ignore Pakistan, and wants little to do with us. " Absolutely spot on and true. How good it will be if Pakistan also does the same and get on with its life.
Can a snubbed first wife behave in such a nasty manner, those with experience can comment..
Congratulations to zanab Yaqoob for writing such an excellent article and correct diagnosis of the disease in the matter of India centric foreign policy of Pakistan. We as an Indian always wish a developed neighbour committed to peace. It is true that some of us in India want a Pakistan centric foreign police, but the problem with us is that We regard Pakistan as an enemy state because of Indo China war in 1962 and want China vacate our occupied land. But the difference is that except a few skirmishes between the two armies, nothing a war like situation has happened during the long 53 years. We appreciate that you also face Kashmir problem but on account of this problem firing on the border often takes place. Secondly there are a good number of people in Pakistan particularly in the military establishment who always wish to export terrorism to India and maintain a strained relationship between the two countries. We also admit that some elements are also in our country who think on the same line. It is the duty of the new generation to forget the all bitter experiences and move towards pace and prosperity. We are not obessed so much if President Obama or a Chinese visits your country. Simply news item appears in print media or in electronic media. .
Dear Author, While I would agree with your assessment (about being less India centric), your analogy with the first wife is a little 'ironic'. India has been the traditional staid, plain, faltering, ageing dowager - though, I dare say, not without her charms - and Pakistan was the new sensation on the block, more confident of her wares, ready for the right bargain, and adept at the the rightly timed tantrum.
In the world of the movies at least, this relationship should have worked quite in reverse.
Regards.
Even before reading the article, I felt that the title must be about this content and it turned out to be an amusing reading. The first wife syndrome can also be said of as entitlement or envy. Even if India PM is not Modi, the US presidential visit is a given as it is for India PM visit to the US. The irate of the PAK is that the US president did not visit PAK, and that is the mind set of entitlement and why India and not me is the sibling rivalry at the best, and it is also called envy.
The accompanying article "Getting to know Modi better" summarizes the first wife syndrome eloquently. The PAK narration cultivated through the years is based on India centric policy. If we take that out of the narration, PAK has little to talk to the world and to her neighbors and that is not a very seductive appeal. So, the only sympathy PAK can gather from polite audiences is by berating how bad the other wife / her elder sister is, and how she is spoiling the happiness of PAK.
I never understood why PAK should be upset when her neighbors are happy. The US is not a husband of PAK or India and neither they are to the US.
The US and India have decided to play ball together because PAK does not want to be a team player. End of story.
Perfect. Not sure if Pakistanis realise that India controls Pakistan's foreign policy and as the author says maybe even domestic policy. Hopefully at least those who read this and reflect will realise this truth.
Good advice but as long as there are news article after news article on India like, "getting to know Modi better", there is a fat chance of Pakistan moving on. India has, so should Pakistan.
It is but natural for Pakistan to react to enemy India . Anything making them stronger is against the interests of Pakistani people . Lets hope that Pakistan remain loyal to their principle stand against India . The welfare of both India and Pakistan or say whole South Asia depend on this stand being non negotiable. Kashmir first and rest in life afterward must stay in blood.and soul.
Very apt analogy ... can the first wife act like a modern non-traditional Pakistani Muslim woman, get a divorce of mutual consent, seek a new partner and start a new life, while maintaining a friendly relation with the ex-husband ... ?
Bangash sahab, I mostly agree with you... and indeed it is sad (at least for the sake of good people like yourself) that your country behaves like the proverbial 'first wife in a bad-marriage' etc etc ... but in terms of what you wish for (the last bit in your article hoping for your country to move-on from its 'Partition moment' blah blah blah) ... I am sorry to say that, just like a 'first wife' (or any numbered wife thereafter for that matter) can never become 'chaste' (i.e. "unmarried" in a biological sense -- I daren't clarify any further if you don't mind!), how will your country be able to do likewise? I mean, can one literally go back in time from that defining 'Partition moment'...? Be it crumbs or be it neglect or be it abuse or be it the odd 'lollypop'... it looks at this stage that that is about all America's 'first wife' will get. Of course I hope I am proved wrong for your sake but the fact is that India and America is not a 'marriage' but an alliance of REAL MEN ... the sooner Pakistan stops behaving like a 'jilted lover' or 'neglected first-wife' or whatever, the better for its own good!!
Hurts....admire your candid assessment.
pakistan need more people like u in policy making and education institution..and yes we indians now are fed up of of being regional..we need a global recognition now..
Pakistan should realize that there many burning issues on domestic scene that need to be addressed first. Others can wait in the higher interests and common good of the society. Time to move on without this stupid India-centric obsession, . Well advised by the colomnist!