Our strategic commercial corridor(s)

Pakistan’s ‘strategic location’ is strategic only if it returns to being the centre of commercial activity.


Shaukat Qadir November 28, 2010
Our strategic commercial corridor(s)

As I wrote in my last column on these pages, Pakistan’s ‘strategic location’ is strategic only if it returns to being the centre of commercial activity. While silk and other goods will still need transportation, today there is far more: energy resources from oil and gas rich Central Asian Republics (CARs) and minerals.

Let us, however, start with China. About a decade ago, China completed an oil pipeline from Kazakhstan to Urumqi, where it constructed an oil refinery. Suddenly, industry sprouted around Urumqi and the entire province has become rich. Goods produced around Urumqi are transported by rail and road to Chinese eastern ports, a distance of about 2,500 miles. From there, transportation by sea to the Far East and the Americas is easy, but to access the rest of the world Chinese ships goes through the Straits of Malacca, travel almost 5,000 miles to reach the Gulf of Aden and another 5,800 miles to reach the Arabian Gulf. Most of this route has operational US military bases on it.

On the other hand, a rail link from Urumqi to Havelian in Pakistan, parallel to the Karakoram Highway, is already in the pipeline, despite some technical difficulties. From Havelian, a direct rail link will connect to Gwadar. An extension of the Kazakhstan oil pipeline from Urumqi to Havelian is also in the offing.

Once the rail-link is established, goods from Urumqi can be transported to Gwadar, a distance of less than 2,000 miles and, once they reach there, they will be at the mouth of the Arabian Gulf and a mere 1,000 miles from the Gulf of Aden!

We know that Afghanistan is rich in mineral resources. The most logical and shortest route for them to reach the seas is via Gwadar; as it is for the CARs. However, if Afghanistan is denied to the CARs, due to insecurity which is likely to prevail for the foreseeable future, the next most logical route is via Iran. This route is unacceptable to the US and the US is in a position to have its way in this matter.

The next route out for the CARs to reach the seas is through China, sharing the rail/road link to Gwadar. A rail link from Almaty (Kazakhstan) to Urumqi already exists. It would take little effort for other CARs to route themselves via Almaty. The US does not favour this route either, but it is not in a position to deny China to the CARs.

This is our strategic commercial corridor (henceforth SCC). Not only will it solve our energy crisis, the revenue generated through commerce can make us a modern day Singapore. The only hindrance is the unrest in Balochistan. That is why our unfriendly neighbour(s) are interested in stoking the unrest there.

Our political leaders cannot see the significance of this or are incapable of doing anything about it since our economic future is inextricably linked to the SCC and, therefore, to peace in Balochistan.

India is also energy starved. It tried to get oil from Myanmar but its plans were foiled by China. Without cheap energy resources, India will fail to achieve its ambitions. The cheapest method of transporting energy is through overland pipelines. For cheap energy to reach India overland, whether from the Middle East, Iran or the CARs, is through Pakistan; that is a geographic reality.

One day, India will acknowledge this truth and realise not only that a peaceful Balochistan is in our common interest but that our economic future is still tied to each other by an umbilical cord.

If we look at the energy and mineral rich CARs, the most logical route out for them is through Afghanistan on to Gwadar.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 29th, 2010.

COMMENTS (13)

CC | 13 years ago | Reply I don't see what is so wrong with Mr. Shaukat Qadir's post. I think he is absolutely correct. Pakistan is faced with an immense opportunity in the next two decades. It is situated next to two countries that will be the two largest economies in the world in a few decades. Pakistan can use this advantage for itself, as well as it strategic location next to the Central Asian Republics. People talk about cost of building infrastructure in Balochistan. Have you people not seen China's agreements with other countries (pipelines in Myanmar, infrastructure in Kazakhstan, etc...)? China takes care of a lot of the initial cost, because it knows it will recoup the cost over the long term due to trade and transport. I can foresee a similar situation with Pakistan. It's not like the Pakistani government has to take pay for everything. I'm sure there can be a 50-50 or even a 60-40 (China-Pakistan) cost sharing agreement. In exchange, China can get unfettered access to roads/railways/pipelines to Gwadar. This will greatly benefit Pakistan, as it will economic/industrial/infrastructural development in places that really need such investment. The knowledge gained by Pakistan can then be applied, independently of China, when Pakistan expands its networks with the CARs, because the CARs will require access to the ocean as well, and Pakistan is the closest and most direct route to faciliate it. Don't worry about cost. The fixed cost of such an investment will be paid back in time through development (human, infrastructure, knowledge, industry, etc...). And I haven't even touched upon the leverage Pakistan has over India yet... I think Mr. Shaukat Qadir's views are absolutely correct.
Arjun | 13 years ago | Reply The Chinese know and understand Pakistan's paranoia well and are using it to their full benefit. They will construct rail lines from Urumqi to Gwadar to transport Chinese goods to the Gulf and Africa and gas from the Middle East up to China. Meanwhile, both Pakistan and India will be mired in their usual bickering while China runs away with the treasure and develops its North West provinces. Kudos to Communist China for being smart and pragmatic in their quest for 1st world status.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ