VIDEO: PTI leader boycotts Pakistan Ulema Council after spat with Pervaiz Rashid

Fayyazul Hasan Chohan and Pervaiz Rashid enter heated debate


Web Desk January 26, 2015

Information Minister Pervaiz Rashid and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf seem to never miss out a chance to censure each other.

At the Pakistan Ulema Council conference, it was no different.

As Rashid addressed the conference, PTI’s Fayyazul Hasan Chohan interrupted the minister’s speech, expressing his views loudly and not allowing anyone else to speak.

Chohan alleged the information minister was not representing the stance of Muslims on blasphemy properly in the international forum.

Pakistan Ulema Council chairman Tahir Ashrafi tried to calm down the two and take control of the situation but to no avail.

Ultimately, the heated debate ended with the PTI boycotting the conference and departing from the venue.



Rashid presses for united front of all religions to promite harmony

Rashid said that all religions must respect the sanctity of other faiths, and religious leaders should play their role in this regard, Radio Pakistan reported.

Addressing the council, Rashid said there should be a united front of all faiths to promote harmony among different religions.

The information minister argued that not only Muslims but followers of all the religions have also strongly condemned the publication of blasphemous caricatures against Islam.

“…we have gathered to condemn the shameful act of French cartoonist and express, share our feelings,” he said. “…Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is a beacon of light for all of us, and by following his teachings we can respond to the enemies of Muslims in a befitting manner.”

Rashid thanked Pope Francis for supporting the stance of Muslims, saying that a delegation from Pakistan should visit the Vatican City and meet with the pope to thank him personally.

COMMENTS (57)

H Chaudhry | 9 years ago | Reply

Actually none of the links prove anything other than giving blanket statements. Regardless, in one of the article, NADRA clearly distances itself from reports. Furhter, what is the definition of bogus/unverified votes. Is it because of bad ink? Actually yes bad ink is reason for many unverified votes but what does that mean? Nothing. It means fix the system for future. In one artice, even if all 4,000 bogus votes are thought of as bogus, PMLN still wins by a wide margin. The result is not statistically different from past efforts.   Further, even if there is massive rigging in NA 118 or what ever seat, why hasn't election commission asked for reelection and above all where is the proof that ex CJP, ex COAS, ex Justice Ramday are involved and even more so where is the proof / trend of a massive rigging to bring PMLN in power.   Rigging in Karachi happened, so was it also to get PMLN in power? Why are we drawing lines to PMLN and letting go MQM. None of this really matters, what matter is that a Judicial commission must sit and Investigate weather there was an ORGANIZED rigging designed by ex CJP, ex COAS, ex Justice Ramday or not! What happened in individual polling stations is irrelevant.   Until we know why Imran decided to blame all of these institution there is no further discussion needed.

Bilal | 9 years ago | Reply If the above does not consitue as rigging.. no idea what does http://tribune.com.pk/story/727892/nadra-submits-na-118-voter-verification-report/ this is a classic case of putting your finder in your ears, closing your eys and repeatedly saying... NO NO NO NO.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ