Stranded in Bangladesh: AGP given till Feb 18 to submit reply

SC asks what is stopping the stranded Pakistanis from coming to Pakistan


Hasnaat Malik January 22, 2015
A file photo of released Pakistani prisoners. PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD:


The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the government’s top attorney more time to submit a reply regarding the repatriation of 300,000 Pakistanis stranded in some 70 camps in Bangladesh.


Hearing a petition filed by the Stranded Pakistanis General Repatriation Committee of Bangladesh, a three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Nasirul Mulk, gave Attorney General of Pakistan (AGP) Salman Aslam Butt till February 18 to submit a reply.



In a previous hearing, the chief justice had questioned whether the top court had the jurisdiction for asking concerned parties about the implementation of the 1974 Tripartite Agreement between India, Bangladesh and Pakistan on Normalisation of Relations in the Subcontinent. “Who is restraining them [stranded Pakistanis] from coming to Pakistan?” he had asked.

During Wednesday’s proceedings, AGP Butt sought more time from the court to file a reply saying he was unaware of the notice issued in this regard.

On the other hand, counsel for the petitioner Rashidul Qazi highlighted the conditions the stranded Pakistanis, most of who are of Bihari descent, were facing in Bangladesh. “They were thrown out of employment and their properties and assets were either frozen by the [Bangladeshi] government or looted by miscreants,” he said.

He added that the conditions in the camps they now live in are ‘wretched’. “Most of them live with their entire families in rooms no larger than six feet by six feet. They have no privacy at all.”

Qazi said “the attitude of Pakistani rulers, political stalwarts and army generals has been deplorable towards the issue of stranded Pakistanis.” He stressed that they were still citizens of Pakistan and despite the ‘sub-human’ conditions they had been subjected to, still proudly hoisted the Pakistani flag. “They were offered Bangladeshi citizenship, but they refused to accept it,” he said.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 22nd, 2015.

COMMENTS (21)

RHS | 9 years ago | Reply

Chachoo & Gul, to me having a country means something. It was that ideal of Pakistan which these people fought for (right or wrong), for which they are still suffering. It is up to them to decide which country they wish to live in. I lived with them for several years. They are good people who really believed in Pakistan. Sorry for the "inconvenience" of bringing up this issue.

Always Learning | 9 years ago | Reply

@ Chachoo and @ Gul Notice you have 2 and 0/1 recommendations respectively. An idea of what most people think of your narrow minded views.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ