Saying 'divorce' consecutively should be punishable, rules CII

Council of Islamic Ideology chairman Maulana Sherani says divorce must be finalised over a period of time


Web Desk January 21, 2015
"Saying the word talaq thrice consecutively is against the Sunnah," said Islamic Idelogy Council’s chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Sherani.

The Council of Islamic Ideology recommended on Wednesday punishment for individuals who say 'divorce' three times consecutively in a bid to finalise the finality of their marriage. 

Citing increasing divorce rates, Islamic Idelogy Council’s chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Sherani said repeating the word talaq (divorce)thrice’ is unlawful and rather a spouse should say the words over a period of time.

"Saying the word talaq thrice consecutively is against the Sunnah," the chairman said.

Islam requires the divorcee to pronounce 'talaq' thrice for it to be legalised. However, the council has upheld it should not be said consecutively.

Maualana Sherani said people get divorced without any hesitation nowadays and much more care should be taken while ending such a 'sacred' relationship.

Islam takes distinction over other religions when it comes to women’s rights, going as far as allowing a woman to seek divorce from her husband if he fails to fulfill his obligations. However, despite laws concerning litigation over matrimonial disputes Pakistani women, face great humiliation and hardships when it comes to safeguarding their rights. 




RELATED POST: Know your rights: Rights of a spouse



Further, last year several rights activists condemned a report of the CII declaring the law requiring consent from first (second or third) wife for another marriage un-Islamic. The CII had said that Sharia did not bind a husband to seek permission from any of his wives before contracting another marriage.



RELATED POST: Women’s rights: ‘Anti-poor, anti-women CII should be abolished’



Aurat Foundation manager Mumtaz Mughal said, “The CII is acting as a supra-state body it has nullified the little constitutional and legal gains working classes, women and non-Muslims had made so far. It nullified land reforms of the 1970s, it dismissed tests as evidence of criminal violence against women and now it is attacking the civil rights of women in Pakistan.”

COMMENTS (38)

truthbetold | 9 years ago | Reply

This discussion about the talaq thingy misses other important points. Then there is the 4 wives issue and the unfair islamic law of the husband having to pay only 90 days of sustenance for the divorced wife.

In India, in the famous Shah Bano case, the poor old lady was left destitute as the husband refused to pay anything after 90 days. The case was contested in the courts from 1978 to 1984. In 1985, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the old lady and was awarded proper divorce payments. The Muslims took to the streets and agitated against the SC decision as being against the teachings of Islam. They made such a violent ruckus that the then Congress government cowardly passsed a law that negated the just decision of the SC.

Women have been the victims of these practices.

Fahad | 9 years ago | Reply

As far as I know no matter how many times u say Talaaq, say 3 or 10 it is ONLY COUNTED AS ONE. Then the husband and wife have 90 days to re concile in which if they fail to do so, the Talaaq has occurred. If they reconcile, then 1 Talaaq is counted.

We need to have a clear law on this.

Sources, Surah Nisa.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ