Paris attacks show hypocrisy of West's outrage: Chomsky

Chomsky outlines a number of examples to illustrate western hypocrisy regarding war on terror, Charlie Hedo attack

Web Desk January 20, 2015
Renowned author Noam Chomsky. PHOTO: AFP

Philosopher and political commentator Noam Chomsky has criticised the hypocrisy of the West's outrage following the attacks on Charlie Hebdo and a kosher supermarket in Paris.

French Prime Minister Manuel Valls declared "a war against terrorism, against jihadism…against everything that is aimed at breaking fraternity, freedom, solidarity," Chomsky wrote in an opinion piece for the CNN.

Charlie Hebdo, which had published sacrilegious cartoons, had been attacked by three men in early January leaving 12 people dead, including the editor and four other cartoonists. A subsequent attack at a kosher supermarket in Paris had left four Jews dead. Condemnation rallies in France after the attacks drew crowds of many hundreds of thousands and several world leaders. 

Chomsky said that the crimes which elicited a flood of commentary, inquiring into the roots of what he termed were "shocking assaults in Islamic culture" and exploring ways to counter the murderous wave of terrorism without sacrificing their values. “The New York Times described the assault as a "clash of civilizations," but was corrected by Times columnist Anand Giridharadas, who tweeted that it was "Not & never a war of civilizations or between them. But a war FOR civilization against groups on the other side of that line. #CharlieHebdo."

He further said that, “The scene in Paris was described vividly in The New York Times by veteran Europe correspondent Steven Erlanger: "a day of sirens, helicopters in the air, frantic news bulletins; of police cordons and anxious crowds; of young children led away from schools to safety. It was a day, like the previous two, of blood and horror in and around Paris…"

…The scene, Erlanger reported, "was an increasingly familiar one of smashed glass, broken walls, twisted timbers, scorched paint and emotional devastation."

He, however, argued that these reports were are not from the January 2015 attack. “Rather, they are from a report by Erlanger on April 24, 1999, which received far less attention. Erlanger was reporting on a NATO ‘missile attack on Serbian state television headquarters’ that "knocked Radio Television Serbia off the air," killing 16 journalists.”

“There were no demonstrations or cries of outrage, no chants of 'We are RTV,' no inquiries into the roots of the attack in Christian culture and history. On the contrary, the attack on the press was lauded. The highly regarded US diplomat Richard Holbrooke, then envoy to Yugoslavia, described the successful attack on RTV as ‘an enormously important and, I think, positive development,’ a sentiment echoed by others,” Chomsky lamented.

He added that there were many other similar events in history which have called for no inquiry into western culture and history - for example, the worst single terrorist atrocity in Europe in recent years, the July 2011 attack by Anders Breivik, a Christian ultra-Zionist extremist who slaughtered 77 people in Oslo.

“Also ignored in the ‘war against terrorism’ is the most extreme terrorist campaign of modern times - Barack Obama's global assassination campaign targeting people suspected of perhaps intending to harm us some day, and any unfortunates who happen to be nearby. Other unfortunates are also not lacking, such as the 50 civilians reportedly killed in a US-led bombing raid in Syria in December, which was barely reported.”

To hammer home his point, Chomsky gave the example of the assault on Fallujah in November 2004, which he termed as 'one of the worst crimes of the US-UK invasion of Iraq.'

“The assault opened with occupation of Fallujah General Hospital, a major war crime quite apart from how it was carried out. The crime was reported prominently on the front page of The New York Times, accompanied with a photograph depicting how ‘Patients and hospital employees were rushed out of rooms by armed soldiers and ordered to sit or lie on the floor while troops tied their hands behind their backs.’

He argued that the occupation of the hospital was considered meritorious and justified: it "shut down what officers said was a propaganda weapon for the militants: Fallujah General Hospital, with its stream of reports of civilian casualties. Evidently, this is no assault on free expression…”

He further questions how France upholds freedom of expression and the sacred principles of "fraternity, freedom, solidarity” by expelling miserable descendants of Holocaust survivors (Roma) to bitter persecution in Eastern Europe; by the deplorable treatment of North African immigrants in the banlieues of Paris where the Charlie Hebdo terrorists became jihadis or when the courageous journal Charlie Hebdo fired the cartoonist Siné on grounds that a comment of his was deemed to have anti-Semitic connotations.

“Anyone with eyes open will quickly notice other rather striking omissions. Thus, prominent among those who face an "enormous challenge" from brutal violence are Palestinians, once again during Israel's vicious assault on Gaza in the summer of 2014, in which many journalists were murdered, sometimes in well-marked press cars, along with thousands of others, while the Israeli-run outdoor prison was again reduced to rubble on pretexts that collapse instantly on examination.”


Sid | 6 years ago | Reply

That there is duplictiy in the western world is without doubt. But the radical islam is currently the biggest threat the world faces, and its foremost enemy is moderate islam.

Every faith has gone through reforms and Islam needs them now. But reforms can happen only through introspection and cannot be brought about by people external to a faith. If moderate muslims do not bring about reforms in their faith (and that would not make it any less strong)...I am afraid we are heading for really dark times.

wasim rajput | 6 years ago | Reply


Well I am surprised to know that there is an Islamic world!!!!! The muslims are almost everywhere in the world but irony of the fate remains that there is no such thing as Isalmic world....The ruling elite of predoninantly Muslim countries is in no way intelligent enough to provide that sense of direction to their countries...being the stooges of some other powers they are detached from the realities of their countries intentionally and involved in cosmetics and afraid of educated and free minds having say in their respective countries. This also helps the splinter groups to prevail on the shoulder of these rulers. Looking at the Muslims as extremists in some utopian Islamic world is misleading for the candid and educated poeple from other faiths. An extremist is an extremist and this is a characteristic that is inherent to human beings not one religious philosophy and that is why we find them in different regions, countries, belonging to different faiths and having diverse manifestations. So looking at it from the perspective of one religion or country or region would lead to wrong conclusions and wrong ways of dealing with this human tendency.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read