Investing in quality teachers

Analysis of ASER Pakistan data draws attention to need for policymakers to focus their attention on government schools

Pauline Rose January 08, 2015
The writer is an adviser at ASER Pakistan and professor of International Education at the University of Cambridge

In the aftermath of the tragic attack on a school in Peshawar, killing over 100 children, who were merely realising their right to go to school, the results of the latest ASER survey turn the spotlight to an ongoing simmering catastrophe that is affecting millions of children in Pakistan. Poor quality of schooling is leaving one in four grade five students unable to read a sentence, and one in two unable to read a story in Urdu/Sindhi/Pashto — simple tasks that they should be able to achieve after being in school for just two years. There has been little change in learning levels in Pakistan over the past three years, according to these ASER data. Unless the government meets its commitment to invest more in education, and targets resources at quality teachers, there is a danger that the learning crisis will prevail for decades to come.

It is important to delve deeper into the ASER data to understand who is in school and, amongst these children, who is learning. In terms of access, our recent analysis finds that while the vast majority of rich girls and boys in rural Pakistan are in school, over 40 per cent of poor rural girls aged 10-12 have never even been to school. Amongst those in school, there is a wide variation in the type of school to which children from different backgrounds gain access. ASER data show that private schooling is a growing phenomenon in Pakistan: between 2013 and 2014, the proportion of children enrolled in these schools has increased from 20 per cent to 24 per cent. Amongst those surveyed, only around 10 per cent of those in school from the poorest households in rural areas are in private schools, compared with 40 per cent of those from the richest households. In addition, there is a clear gender divide amongst the poorest in rural Pakistan: the poorest girls are 31 per cent less likely to attend private schools than are the poorest boys.

ASER data provide further important insights into who is learning. Amongst 10 to 12-year-olds in rural government schools, who should have reached grade five, one-third cannot read sentences. While those in rural private schools are faring better, it is still a cause for concern that more than one-fifth of children in these schools cannot achieve this task, which they would be expected to have reached by grade two. Overall, wealth is of far greater importance than whether a child is in a government or private school. More rich children in government schools are learning than are poor children in private schools. And within both government and private schools, poorer children are around three times more likely to be unable to read a paragraph than richer children in the same type of school.

There could be a number of explanations for the wealth gap in learning. One possibility is that children from richer households are more likely to be able to pay for private tuition to compensate for the poor quality of schooling. This is indeed the case in rural Pakistan according to ASER data: 18 per cent of rich boys having access to private tuition compared with just three per cent of poor girls. However, private tuition still does not wipe out wealth differences in learning, suggesting that other factors are important. The poorest performing groups of richer children (those at government schools who do not receive private tuition) outperform the best performing groups of poorer children (those at private schools who do receive private tuition).

Overall, analysis of ASER Pakistan data draws attention to the need for policymakers to focus their attention on government schools given that this is not only where the majority of the poorest children are studying, but also where learning levels are the lowest. The fact that rich children in government schools are learning indicates that we ought not to dismiss out of hand the role that government schools can play.

To ensure the most disadvantaged children in government schools are learning, there is an urgent need to invest in more teachers and in the quality of teachers. One outcome of an insufficient number of teachers is resulting in children of different ages studying in the same class. According to ASER findings, 43 per cent of grade two children in government schools are studying in the same class as children in other age groups, compared with 25 per cent in private schools. Teachers are unlikely to be prepared for teaching such multi-grade classes. Only 33 per cent of teachers in government schools covered by the ASER survey have graduated, compared with 39 per cent in private schools. It is a further cause for concern that more than one in 10 government school teachers were reported to be absent. Understanding the reasons for their absenteeism and tackling them is needed to ensure that children’s learning does not continue to suffer.

The abysmal situation in learning in Pakistan is reflected around the world: globally, 250 million children are not learning the basics in reading and mathematics, according to Unesco’s 2014 Education for All Global Monitoring Report. Around half of these children have spent at least four years in school, suggesting that they are receiving an extremely poor quality of education. Children who are disadvantaged due to circumstances at birth are most likely to be amongst those who are not learning, whether because they are born into poor households, live in rural areas, have a disability, or are girls. To change this situation, governments around the world need to invest in the education system’s most important resource: its teachers. World leaders will meet at the United Nations in New York in September to agree new global development goals to be achieved by 2030. Learning lessons from ASER will be a vital contribution to ensuring that they fulfill their promises that all children, regardless of circumstance, are learning the basics by 2030. 

Published in The Express Tribune, January 9th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.



aamir | 9 years ago | Reply

in pakistan, teaching is thought of as like a loser profession. because when people don't get jobs they come to this field. their packages should be raised and better qualified people with great communication skills and knowledge should be hired. they shouldn't be lecturers they should be coaches and inspirations. that is what a teacher is. its not a job. its a responsibilty.

Tousif Latif | 9 years ago | Reply I am a teacher serving in a village and seventeen years that I have spent in this profession, teaching the students of most poor segments of society have intimately revealed the problems of teachers,teaching and students. Still I can claim without any shade of doubt that the rate of return on investment in education is far higher than investments drained on military and civilian bureaucracy.We have not equipped our teachers with proper training to teach.Teachers' salaries are comparably lower than being paid in other government sector jobs.In villages teachers have certain disadvantages.Parents mostly illiterate are not so concerned about the studies of their students.There is no post school monitoring of students.The issue of language has played havoc.English language is a stumbling block. Our approach to English language teaching and teachers' ability to teach English at primary and secondary level is in a very poor and pathetic state.Situation becomes hopeless when these students join college and fail in battalions in English.Majority of the teachers teaching in villages do not belong to that village.Many of them male and frmale cruise the distance of more than fifty kilometers in the morning to reach their schools.Our visionless politicians and policy makers have no sense of direction.They cannot change it.Teachers enjoy highest esteem and respect in countries like China Korea Turkey and Malaysia.They have invested in education and got the results that are not less than miracles.But their leaders had condfidence in their people and determination to change their societies.Our elite has no such objective they are enjoying themselves.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ