Following a week where 11 security personnel were killed in attacks in Indian Kashmir, for which Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar had blamed Pakistan, Times of India reported.
"I feel that there has to be some strong response which will once and for all reduce these blatant attempts. It's an open secret that they (militants) came from Pakistan."
In response, the FO spokesperson in statement on Saturday said that these “unfounded allegations and provocative statements are not conducive to peace in the region.”
“There must not be any miscalculation about Pakistan's resolve to defend itself and thwart any aggression.”
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Indian army should capture pakistani side of kashmir, that is they will be save.
The message from Pak foreign office to India is quite clear to stop issuing complaints or threats as status quo at LoC would be maintained regardless by it. Pakistan who was subjected to strong Indian response recently had little or no effect which was evident from the major attack at Uri sector army base in which six Pakistani terrorists and eleven Indian security personnel were killed. Pakistan's military top brass after its chief's visit to USA, China's friendship and nuclear deterrence are miscalculating India's resolve to take punitive action without being influenced by any of these factors. India is now left with no other alternative but resort to limited or all out war options which is quite evident from the Indian Defence Minister's statement which should not be ignored.
We don't want peace. We want to push out Arabs from Pakistan and Afghanistan.
All might wonder why ET has pulled its fantasy story about india planning to attack its own people and blame PAKISTAN!!! Perhaps the FO didn't get the memo about the Pakistani government's open support for JuD (actually still LeT!) and their recent rally threatening India!!!
Did India claim that their statements are meant to create a peaceful climate? Why does the Pakistan foreign office misread its friendly neighbour?
Rex Minor
And encouraging the mastermind of Mumbai mass-killings with an international bounty on his head to go around freely spreading terrorist propaganda is very conducive to talks.
Something very fishy. FO is warning against "allegations", while establishment is floating trial balloons that RAW is getting ready for "false flag" operations. President Obama is about to visit India. Going by past history of US presidential visits to India, this means an attack is being prepared and preemptive denials are being put in place.
What is NOT conducive to peace is - talking to insurgents in the host country's capital when presented with a clear choice of either talking o insurgents or the host country overnment - firing at civilians across the international border - sending proxies to disrpt peaceful elections. - - go ernment facilitating a 2 day gathering of JuD - an organisation that has beemed as a terrorist organization t just by India but also US and UN and the open collectio of funds by this organization which talks about gazwa-e-Hind. All this happened not in some unovernned part of FATA but in a suburb of Lahore.