Oil prices drop below $60 a barrel

In London, Brent crude for January tracked the same pattern, finishing down 56 cents to $63.68 a barrel


Afp December 11, 2014

NEW YORK: US oil prices tumbled below $60 a barrel for the first time since July 2009 on Thursday, taking the shocking loss since June to about 44 per cent.

Prices held up for most of the day before sinking more than $1.00 in the final two hours of trade on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

At the close, West Texas Intermediate crude for January delivery, the US benchmark, had lost 99 cents from Wednesday to $59.95 a barrel.

In London, Brent crude for January tracked the same pattern, finishing down 56 cents to $63.68 a barrel.

"Below $60, we're crossing another line here," said James Williams, energy analyst at WTRG Economics of the WTI price.

He said that Wednesday's US stockpiles report, with a rise in levels of stored crude and refined products, just added to the selling pressure on the oversupplied global market.

"There's plenty of supply, more than plenty," he said. "Refineries are running full output, products increasing, and still an increase in crude."

"Conceivably, we could see crude going below $50 for a short period of time," he warned.

"The oil market may be oversold from a technical perspective, but it continues to lack fundamental support for a meaningful reversal to the upside," said Tim Evans of Citi Futures.

COMMENTS (3)

taz | 9 years ago | Reply

and people of pakistan are thanking our PM for reduction in oil prices, no wonder this nation can be fooled so easily.

cautious | 9 years ago | Reply

Bad news for the Oil Cartel .. but they have been gouging the World for a long time and it's unlikely that many have sympathy for them. Countries like Iran, Russia, Venezuela, and Saudi Arabia may have to make significant adjustments to their budgets and the consequences of those adjustments will be interesting to watch.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ