The National Assembly was not much better at responding to questions put to it by lawmakers. According to the data presented, of the 8,660 questions raised during the first parliamentary year, only 31.2 per cent were answered. The largest number of questions pertained to police working and performance. Departmental delays in responding to the queries forwarded to them, long gaps in the convening of parliament and the frequent absence of both ministers and members were cited as the major factors for the prolonged period of time taken in responding to the questions.
This is clearly not a reassuring state of affairs. The attitude taken by the assemblies suggests a disturbing lack of priority given to addressing concerns. This, of course, should be the basic purpose of the legislature. Otherwise, the reasons for its existence begin to come under doubt. The ruling party must, of course, take the lead in this matter, by setting the right precedent. The laxity we see is simply unacceptable. It has existed in the past as well, with parliamentary performance coming under frequent scrutiny. The detailed findings put forward on a specific aspect of parliamentary function are important. They help us to pin-point precisely where the problem lies. Those who sit in the assemblies must realise the urgent need to do better if they want to serve the people who voted for them in the first place.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 1st, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ