Economic development, civil-military relations and governance, nuclear proliferation, and counter-terrorism should be at the forefront of the new Western strategy for Pakistan, the authors of the report recommended.
The report predominantly argues that a more coordinated approach is required for Pakistan combining an economic strategy with a security strategy. A more long-term strategy will be needed to steer Pakistan out of its instabilities and toward a healthier direction.
It makes a set of policy recommendations for the transatlantic community in four key areas, namely, economic development, civil-military relations and governance, nuclear proliferation, and counter-terrorism.
With Pakistan’s fast growing nuclear arsenal at the forefront of the world’s concern, the recommendation outlines that the dangers posed by Pakistan's nuclear development should be highlighted through public statements which should attempt to define clearer incentives for Pakistan to adopt a more stabalising nuclear posture.
"The discussion of Pakistan’s nuclear programme should feature not just in dialogues between the transatlantic allies, but also in formal Track-I and Track-II dialogues with China, India, and Afghanistan," the report notes, while emphasising how Pakistan’s nuclear programme is almost entirely absent in both US and European dialogues with China.
On counterterrorism, the authors of the report suggests that the United States and Europe need to establish a clearer division of labor on counterterrorism issues, including by realising a clear role for the European Union.
"A better understanding of the implications of Pakistan’s continued support for militant proxies is needed, as well as efforts to deepen cooperation between Afghanistan and Pakistan," said the report, adding that US and European policy toward terrorism and militancy in Pakistan has been shaped by the intervention in Afghanistan and the threat of exported terrorism for the better part of 15 years.
Additionally, the report says, the transatlantic partners can help to increase the civilian role in law enforcement within Pakistan, including through training programs and development assistance.
The West's policy should also aim to facilitate Afghanistan-Pakistan cooperation on counter-terrorism by better tracking militancy in the region and improving law enforcement and customs procedures.
Interestingly, the report also urges "using Malala Yousafzai’s Nobel Peace Prize to further raise public awareness about Pakistan’s complicated web of militant, insurgent, and Islamist entities and what they mean for the country, region, and international community."
On civil-military relations and governance, the report argues that the United States and Europe can do much more to focus their efforts on specific governance issues — such as energy and education — rather than spreading "themselves too thin".
Western support could involve initiatives to empower parliamentary standing committees and the judiciary, the report said.
"Better efforts can be made to shape popular narratives by supporting and educating members of the media and reforming school curricula," said the report.
Additionally, the United States and Europe can do much more to take human rights violations seriously, the report argued. "This should involve holding the Pakistan government more accountable for human rights abuses by security forces or state-supported militias against religious and ethnic minorities, women, and other marginalised groups."
Finally, on economic development, Andrew Small argues that the United States and Europe, as the largest providers of development assistance and export destinations, still have a role to play in transforming Pakistan’s economy from its current parlous state.
"But this would involve embracing and cooperating with a new wave of regional infrastructure initiatives and economic institutions, often driven by the Gulf States and China," said the co-author of the report.
The United States and Europe can also use their bilateral and multilateral economic leverage to advance efforts at regional integration and connectivity, he argued.
"And they can use the military withdrawal from Afghanistan to reorient the relationship around economics and investment, in order to help Pakistan realize its potential as an emerging market," he said.
The report suggests that the West should be supportive of new infrastructure initiatives and realise Pakistan's potential as an emerging market.
The US and its transatlantic partners have also been directed to invest in the media and media training. Funding for the public education system should also be expanded, said the report.
More importantly, the report recommends that investment should be made in key areas such as education and energy supply, rather than across a broad range of sectors, where investment may bear no fruit.
As forces begin to depart from Afghanistan, it may be time for a fresh start and a new policy for Pakistan, one which is not in conjunction with Afghanistan's policy, the report maintains, while maintaining that Pakistan will still remain crucial in Afghanistan’s stability following the drawdown of the military.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Candid1: Excellent Reflection, Bravo! But! Just by loading on Amo is not going to kill the demon. We have to straightened our House, Peacefully! Find, tag and put-a-number on all those factors that are weakening our walls, roof and floor! Eliminate all issues of Distrust Among Pak Smaller minorities, races, tribes, creeds, clans, ethnicities or self proclaim nations. It's no joke that all great Nations have put that in their constitutions. Do that first and the rest will follow!
US is not leaving Afghanistan and this conflict will begin receding from world's attention.
One should question the west that economic development is attached to many factors, in case of Pakistan, which has already paid huge economic cost on an imposed War on Terror and if India continues to promote terrorism against Pakistan by using their military bases in Tajikistan. Secondly, the created false propaganda by the West against Pakistan, which is making fuss in the foreign investors including the nuclear suppliers to overcome the energy needs of Pakistan. How can this discriminatory conduct lead to the stability of the region? If the West wants to have South Asian strategic stability it needs to treat Pakistan on equal bases without the discrimination.
West is trying to befool their people as they have always done.The fact is the people especially in USA are alarmingly illinformd and dumb. Politicians make full use of this trait. Most of them won't know where Afghanistan is. George was a worthy President for such people.
History appears to be repeating itself. During the 1990s the Western nations sanctioned Pakistan on the pretext of its nuclear program, after they beleived they had met their objectives in Afghanistan and no longer needed Pakistan. Now that they are extricating themselves from Afghanistan, the bogey of Pakistan's nuclear weapons is being raised again to prepare the ground for future punitive action against Pakistan.
This approach of Western nations is shockingly hypocritcal, as they derive the maximum benefit from Pakistan's cooperation, yet act to undermine Pakistan's security. There was no way the West could have won the Cold War without Pakistan's cooperation in Afghanistan. As a result of this victory Germany was re-united, thousands of Soviet nuclear missiles were no longer aimed at Western cities and troops, Eastern Europe was liberated, NATO expanded with addition of new members, and the entire Western economies enjoyed a peace dividend.
In contrast, Pakistan - the country whose crtical role led to the Western benefits, was abandoned, sanctioned, and weakened. Rather, Pakistan's enemy was bolstered, in spite of the fact that India supported the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, and was firmly anti-West and NATO.
The same pattern in being repeated now. While Pakistanis are dying to keep the West safe from terrorism, the West is selling billions of dollars of weapons to India which has an established record of attacking Pakistan, and even dismembering it.
Therefore, Pakistan needs to do whatever it takes to protect itself. If that means producing thousands of warheads then so be it, because the West has proven itself to be a duplicitous friend, and Pakistan cannot stand still while its enemy makes preparation to destroy it.
Folks! If there was a chance of unbiased reports in Western Media earlier, it's getting bleaker by the day with army of Indian migrants Infiltrating such institutions to get their story mingled into all reports & publishings on or about Pakistan. Some times these so called "REPORTS" are so loaded with TELL-TALE signs of Who Cooked it. That it make you laugh with delight! Above report is nothing new. I have seen numerous tainted "RESEARCH" reports more "Colorful" than that!
On the issue of nuclear safety and security Pakistan has largely been discriminated and negatively portrayed vis-à-vis India by the international community. India there has been incidents related to safety and security e.g. theft of nuclear materials from facilities, murder of nuclear scientist, many nuclear power plants are not under IAEA inspection/safeguards etc. While in Pakistan there is no example of such incident embarrassing for the nuclear establishment. Despite that India is granted with Civil Nuclear Deal and also the discussions are going on within NSG about the Indian membership in the regime.
If you look at India with its nuclear installations, you will find that there have been 153 incidents at Indian nuclear installations. But there has come up no such (American) statement regarding India. In fact, Pakistan is their most important target. Usa has deployed their tactical nuclear weapons in Europe and there is no threat, India is enhancing its tactical nuclear capabilities and there is no worry. But Pakistan has tactical nuclear weapons..... Oh no.... what? these are dangerous...
The Think Tank report is just a crap and nothing. The 2014 Nuclear Threat Initiative's Nuclear Materials Security Index, which is a unique public assessment of nuclear materials security conditions in 176 countries, ranked Pakistan above India. Pakistan scored three more points compared to 2012, and was recognized as "the largest improvement of any nuclear-armed state." Unfortunately, western scholars, particularly financed by RAW and India are in race to malign Pakistan's nuclear capability in global community.
"a clear role for the European Union" I don't mean to be rude but the EU cant even decide its own role in the world let alone set its priorities regarding far flung countries. A union of bankrupt nations kept afloat by Germany. Right wingers who detest the EU have made gains in recent European elections and its role in the world will only diminish further as time goes by. For the immediate future they will probably be focusing on Ukraine and bickering with Russia over its invasion of Krimea.
It is unfortunate that the safety of Pakistan's nuclear weapons has been subjected to baseless and unnecessary criticism since the country tested its nuclear device. A minor faction often claims that Pakistan's nuclear weapons are not safe and can fall into the hands of militants. It is highly unlikely that these insurgents will get their hands on nuclear weapons which are under the security of more than 25,000 professionally trained personnel.
@ Aisha - Does Pakistan really care? Indians have been on our case since day 1 - Let them cry eventually their ranting will sidappear! :)
This report is highly insulting to Pak. Authored primarily by an Indian-American it paints the army in a very negative light.