Contending with the IS threat in Pakistan

Published: November 23, 2014
The writer was foreign secretary from 1994-97 and also served as Pakistan’s ambassador to Iran (1992-94) and the US (1990-91)

The writer was foreign secretary from 1994-97 and also served as Pakistan’s ambassador to Iran (1992-94) and the US (1990-91)

Last week, I had promised to write about the measures Muslim countries are taking to counter the threat of the Islamic State (IS) virus infecting people in their countries. Perhaps, the best place to start is the meeting of the regional countries convened in Kuwait, clearly at US insistence on October 27. The joint statement said in part: “The coalition partners discussed steps their governments are taking, individually and cooperatively, to strengthen the resistance of our communities to Da’esh’s/ISIL’s extremist message. This involves intensifying our engagement to address significant events; enhancing exchanges, training and other cooperative programmes for government leaders and spokespersons; actively opposing the recruitment of foreign fighters; and encouraging important religious and social leaders, opinion-makers, and the millions of young people who oppose violent extremism to raise their voices through traditional and social media.” How has this played out in Arab countries?

Jordan was already prosecuting recruiters for the IS and those waving IS banners, but more recently, there has been a dramatic advance in its control of extremist elements. Previously, it had taken steps to prevent the use of the pulpit to criticise the monarchy and the policies the government has followed, while allowing preachers some freedom on other subjects. Now, it has gone further. The Jordanian Minister of Islamic Affairs, Hayel Dawood, undertook a tour of the country to address the imams of the 5,500 mosques out of a total of 7,000 in which Friday khutbas are delivered. He conveyed the message that the imams were “our ground forces against the extremists” and, therefore, not only should they not speak against the monarchy, but should also say nothing that would support calls for jihad or for extremist thought.

Dawood recommended such subjects for sermons as “security and stability, the need for unity in a time of crisis”, and “the beginning of the rainy season — safety measures in preparation for winter”. He went on to suggest that keeping in mind the example set by the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him), whose sermons were about 10 minutes long, they should not deliver sermons longer than 15 minutes. He also let it be known that the number of persons he employed to monitor mosques would be increased from 60 to 200 and perhaps, even to 400.

Dawood, of course, had two tools at his disposal. First, most imams were on the government’s payroll and could be dismissed and denied access to mosques if they disobeyed his instructions. Other imams had been permitted to deliver sermons, but only after they had been vetted by the intelligence service and such clearance could be withdrawn. Second, Jordan’s newly enhanced anti-terrorism law permitted the state security court to press charges against anyone openly supporting the IS.

Most other Arab countries have also in the past exercised a measure of control over what could be preached in mosques, but further measures have been implemented or are being contemplated. Egypt has banned tens of thousands of unlicensed clerics from mosques, while some reports suggest that the Saudi authorities intend introducing security screening for prospective preachers.

In the UAE, where there has been no real threat of extremism, the government policy enunciated by the UAE ambassador in Washington is that the UAE regards “extremism as an existential threat”. Admittedly, this is probably designed to explain why the UAE armed forces have been flying alongside the Americans in Libya and now in Syria to win brownie points in Washington in the quest for support against Iran, but a very real fear of sectarian strife also exists. There, too, the control of mosques and what is preached is very much the order of the day, as it is in most other Gulf States and in North Africa.

But it is not the Arab countries alone that have taken new measures to counter the appeal of the IS. Indonesia has increased its monitoring of those travelling to and from Turkey and other entry points into Syria and Iraq. It has banned display of support for the IS since this violates the country’s ideology of “unity through diversity”. It has also started working with clerics and Muslim organisations to counter pro-IS elements on social media and in mosques. It has been helped by the fact that one of the principal Muslim organisations, the Jemaah Islamiyah, has denounced the IS, accusing it of being “takfiri”, while others have cast doubts on the IS’s credentials and the legitimacy of its claim to being a caliphate.

In Pakistan, everyone acknowledges that we allowed ourselves to become the secondary battlefield for the Iraq-Iran conflict of the 1980s because of the petro-dollars that both sides of the conflict poured into the coffers of our clerics and because General Zia saw this as an essential part of his Islamisation policy. This, perhaps, more than the conflict raging next-door and the unwise use of religious elements to further our regional ambitions, tore our social fabric apart and created horrendous law and order problems. If Pakistan is today termed a ‘dangerous place’ or an ‘ungovernable space’, much of the blame is to be laid at the door of those clerics and leaders, who at the behest of foreign millionaires, abandoned the traditionally tolerant interpretation of faith followed in South Asia, for the bigotry and intolerance that is the hallmark of discourse on religion in modern Pakistan.

Surely, our leaders recognise that we have now reached the stage where our people are more vulnerable to the siren call of an organisation like the IS than any of the Arab or Southeast Asian countries I have mentioned. Even if we cannot take drastic measures that they have taken, we can surely do more than we are now doing to prevent the spread of the IS message. We can ensure that organisations we have banned remain truly banned and do not reappear under different names to collect funds or recruit impressionable youth. We can do more to influence the sermons that are delivered in our mosques. And above all, we can do more to ensure that funds from the IS, which is termed the richest terrorist organisation in the world, does not purchase new adherents for itself or for its fraternal extremist organisations.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 24th, 2014.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (4)

  • Rex Minor
    Nov 24, 2014 - 12:16AM

    One does not take action against the coming storm nor can take adequate precautions for preventing the coming earthquake. The potential of ISIL is present in every muslim country where the people are being subdued by local militias and armies and their Governments are unable to establish a democratic order.. Pakistan remains the top candidate after Egypt for ISIL style operation since several indigenous groups are already well placed to facilitate ISIL type march!!!

    Rex Minor


  • vinsin
    Nov 24, 2014 - 12:24AM

    Muslims scared of muslims.


  • Hedgefunder
    Nov 24, 2014 - 4:42AM

    Very informative and factual piece of work.
    However for Pakistan this problem is very real as it has already neglected its national interest for flawed policies, hence the mess in NW and internal security crises over last decade, if not longer. Zia did start this mess, however various govts and military continued with this process, including creation of Taliban.
    Now you have very delusional, uneducated, socially deprived and unemployed young generation , who incidentally may just fall for this illusion of what IS is selling them.
    Just another dream of paradise ! The alarms bells should be ringing in Islamabad & Rawalpindi, to wake up.


  • S.R.H. Hashmi
    Nov 24, 2014 - 10:18PM

    Our government is doing whatever intelligence and courage levels of its officials allow it to manage to think of, and do to ward off the very real threat form IS. Did you not hear the federal level gentleman who stood up, overflowing with confidence which only an accomplished idiot could afford to do, in the circumstances that we are facing, and proudly announced that there is no IS in Pakistan. Not stopping at that, he even reprimanded others for unduly resorting to scare-mongering. He seems pretty certain that denying IS presence in Pakistan and wishing them away is all that is needed to keep the wolves at bay.



More in Opinion