Temple torched: Around 1,400 Hindus religious sites need protection

Patron-in-chief of Pakistan Hindu Council condemns torching of Hanuman Mandir in Tando Mohammad Khan


Our Correspondent November 23, 2014

ISLAMABAD:


Around 1,400 Hindus religious sites across the country are in dire need of protection by the government, the representative body of Hindus said on Saturday, while condemning the attack on a temple in a town in Sindh.


Patron-in-chief of Pakistan Hindu Council MNA Dr Ramesh Kumar Vankwani has strongly condemned the torching of Hanuman Mandir on Friday in Tando Mohammad Khan, located 40 kilometres away from Hyderabad, Sindh.

Pakistan Hindu Council, in a statement issued on Saturday, requested the government for the provision of security of Hindu worship places at national level.

Dr Ramesh also regretted the burning of Hindu holy books Geeta and Ramayan in Shikarpur district of Sindh in March this year. Such incidents could be avoided, if the Supreme Court orders regarding protection of minorities were implemented, he said. He further questioned that why innocent minorities were left at the mercy of extremists.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 23rd, 2014.

COMMENTS (21)

Aschraful Makhlooq | 9 years ago | Reply

No doubt this is the greatest and biggest ever tragedy and dilemma for the corrupt Pakistani leadership that minorities' worship's places are unsafe in Pakistan but how shamefully few handful Pakistani extremists' brutal apparent attitude is being portrayed in the world and defaming all the peace loving Pakistani people and this is what the negative propaganda the international media wants against to spread all over the world.Are all the worship places in India safe of the other religion's people that India is defaming Pakistan?????

R.Subramanian | 9 years ago | Reply Does Pakistan has any rights to talk about Babri Masjid and rights of minorities any more... shame on you Pakistan
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ