Golen Gol Hydropower Project: Irregularity alleged in Chitral power project

SC seeks replies in plea challenging award of project to a foreign firm


Our Correspondent October 28, 2014
Golen Gol Hydropower Project: Irregularity alleged in Chitral power project

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has asked Ministry of Water and Power and Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) to submit replies regarding alleged irregularities of Rs1billion in Golen Gol Hydro Power Project in Chitral.

The two-judge bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, accepted appeal against a verdict of Islamabad High Court (IHC), which on February 10 had rejected a petition, filed by Centre for Empowering Society (CES) President Muhammad Shafique Khan Sawati.



Advocate Hashmat Habib, appearing before the court on behalf of Sawati, challenged the award of Golen Gol Hydro Power Project to Andritz Hydro Gmbh - Andritz Austria (China) Ltd Construction.

The petition said Wapda had earlier declared Andritz Hydro Gmbh as non-responsive and guilty of 19 major commercial deviations. But all of a sudden it became Wapda’s favourite company and was awarded a contract with a padding of Rs1 billion after being declared non-responsive single bidder, it said.

“Wapda under law was required to strictly observe PPRA Rules to establish transparency in the procurement but committed serious violation by extending the submission period for more than 12 times, creating confusion for the genuine bidder and playing evil-game, declared the Respondent No. 4 (the company) a single bidder as successful with Rs1billion padding to award contract,” it said.

It said the IHC’s judgment was ‘bad in law and facts’ and ‘liable to be struck down/set aside’ to ensure transparency in the operation of Wapda.

“The IHC division bench seriously erred by holding that under Rule 33 (3) of the PPRA Rules, Wapda authorities can issue notices to the bidders, who had already pre-qualified and there is no need for re-tendering the whole project,” the petition said.

The petition also argues that the IHC had also erred in holding that allegations were not supported by any evidence and said the court ignored that the documents on record were conclusive proof that in the previous bid the  final evaluated price  was Rs4,745,915,559/.

“[But a] letter of acceptance is issued for a total price of Rs5,65,121,256/- [which reflects]  a clear padding of Rs1 billion thus what else is required as further evidence,” it said.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 28th, 2014.

COMMENTS (3)

Shah Karez | 10 years ago | Reply

Who will come to the rescue of this nation. Silence on the part of our leaders on this issue is not understandable

Anon | 10 years ago | Reply

@Oats: Uh... Wapda... IHC....Supreme Court... Doesnt this sound like a federal issue?

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ