Not to be outdone, some of us in Pakistan have done wonders in this arena so far. The logic behind or the consequences of uttering doomsday warnings is not considered here. The latest issue that has come up in this regard is the one about creating more provinces. There are those, according to whom, it is vital that Sindh is split into more provinces. The response given by the ruling party of Sindh is even more interesting. The PPP’s co-chairperson declared that Pakistan is fine as it is and that any subdivision of Sindh will destroy Pakistan. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari went a step ahead and said in no uncertain terms that death was preferable than the division of Sindh. Surely, we have not forgotten that it was the PPP, which spearheaded the campaign for the creation of Seraiki and Hazara provinces just before the last general elections. Ironically, non-acceptance of the demand for more provinces was also linked to the dismemberment of Pakistan. Does this somersault by the PPP make any sense? Is all this just politics or is there a greater scheme at work?
Then there is another group, which is doing its very best to convince us that Balochistan is close to breaking away from Pakistan unless something is done on emergency basis. In the next breath, this group equates Balochistan with the erstwhile East Pakistan. Occasionally, the media also joins in and then all hell breaks loose. I wonder how many of these fine gentlemen have even visited the province, or if they have done so, have stepped out of Quetta. I also wonder if anyone has ever stopped to ponder over the fate of all the money given to Balochistan so far. One ex-chief minister was very forthright about it. According to him, one year the province got Rs45 billion. All this money was distributed equally among 45 Baloch parliamentarians for ‘development’. There is no doubt that Bolochistan lags far behind other provinces and that the majority of Balochis in parts of the province are extremely poor. But our diagnosis of the issues facing it is skewed. The fear so created does, however, benefit its perpetrators. And now we get lectured day in and day out about democracy being seriously threatened. It is very conveniently forgotten that people harping on about democracy these days are only worried about their petty self-interests and that the Constitution they refer to is often what gives them a stranglehold on our lives. Whoever said that the constitution must serve the country and its people and that it must be dynamic enough to meet future challenges, needs to be confronted by these champions of democracy. The fear factor is built around two key elements: 1) that Pakistan is very fragile; 2) the simplest of causes, like making more provinces for administrative reasons, not catering to the whims of a few chosen ones in Balochistan, or improving the Constitution for its largest stakeholders, can lead to the country’s destruction. Some also add the construction of Kalabagh Dam in the same category.
Does anyone remember the propaganda blitz of the late 1960s when most of us in this part of the country were convinced that Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s six-point agenda was, in fact, a conspiracy to break up Pakistan? Unfortunately, Pakistan did break up, over those very six points, but not because of them. It would be very interesting if we were to examine those six points in the light of the Eighteenth Amendment. We might come to the conclusion that perhaps, their acceptance in some form could have charted another, more progressive course for Pakistan.
Our perceptual biases need a reality check now and then. If nothing else, the ongoing political unrest should have opened our eyes to this single-most important lesson. We see some of the leading lights of the Balochistan cause singing to a different tune now that their needs, not those of the people, have been addressed adequately. We also find that democracy, if at all, is threatened more by the incompetence of our democrats rather than anything else. People also appear to have accepted the need to take our Constitution beyond the twenty amendments introduced, solely due to very limited and often very selfish reasons. Creation of more provinces on administrative grounds may not affect Pakistan negatively. Unfortunately, like the Kalabagh Dam, we have changed the basic premise behind each of these issues and now, the discussion has degenerated into petty politics once again.
The danger lies in politicising everything within reach, and some things even beyond. This is not fear, but an ugly reality.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 28th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@chandran: I & every one is aware of this, but name 1 person who can lead us from the present lot & the lot that you may see, but not us....
@Ishrat Salim
Democracy is not perfect in our countries like western countries. If you have frequent election in poor countries like us that also incur huge cost on our population.
A very enlightning and interesting article indeed. The biggest problem we have is that we are emotional people and dont like to base our talk on reasoning or logic. At one point some so called intellectuals opposeing Kalabagh dam ran out of reasoning but decided to oppose it for just sake of Opposing it. similarly six ponts By Mujib were said to be conspiracy to break Pakistan and soon it became a poupar opinion in West pakistan without everver discussing its merit or demerits. We don't analyse issues on scientific or ligical grounds. Most of the stands are taken on Emotioms and people try to find every sort of reason to defend it. Creating new administrative unit is practiced everywher in the world and has lots of advantages.those who oppose it fear loss of thier continued exploitation of smaller units.
@chandran:
I would agree with on this 100%, but name 1 politician, an honest, god-fearing & patriotic politician who is capable enough to lead this country out of the mess...? give your honest opinion, please.
Isn't it strange that the Peoples Party, which spearheaded the campaign for Seraiki and Hazara provinces should oppose, and so vehemently, the creation of divisions within Sindh where an actual division into urban and rural regions has already taken place, and where the Peoples Party winning nearly all its seats from rural Sindh, does not care much for urban Sindh which does not give it many seats, not that it really cares for rural Sindh, as the conditions there clearly indicate. And to make it worse, MQM, which holds the overwhelming mandate in urban Sindh, especially Karachi, was not allowed to play an active part in the running of Karachi even when it was formally a part of Sindh government. The deprivation of MQM, and the people of Urban Sindh, can be judged by the fact that Karachi, port town, as also industrial and commercial hub of Pakistan, with a population of nearly twenty million, is not considered worth having even a duly empowered local government which would have given an opportunity to MQM to play a significant role, and is run more like a small village, and that too, from interior Sindh, in a step-motherly fashion. And the present Sindh Government does not have any credentials of its own by way of performance and has been getting votes simply by invoking peoples sympathy for its Shaheeds: Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Benazir Bhutto. However, even that reservoir of sympathy seems to be drying up as a result of worst form of governance, and its leaders, having no performance record to boast about and nothing better to offer, are basing their campaign merely on theatrics. And the young Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, while preaching Bhuttoism, has also asked Mian Nawaz Sharif to embrace it. However, before the final split, ZAB was reported to have suggested to Sheikh Mujeeb "Tum udhar aur harm idhar" and that, without the addition of popular prefix Mersoon, Mersoon' which is fast catching up these days, would have read as "East Pakistan Desoon, Adhay Mulk par hukumat kersoon" and he actually did that. As such, apart from other sound arguments justifying it, I see demand for Karachi as a separate administrative division (province) of Sindh to be quite in line with Bhuttoism as well, so be it. Karachi
Kala bagh dam fear is fear for a reason The 1991 Indus Water-Sharing Accord, a document guaranteed by the constitutional body the Council of Common Interests, has been violated, and that Punjab has "stolen" water.2 Indus river flows only in rainy season.
Retired Army people please stay away from politics and allow the politicians to do politics because it is their duty. like you are having duty to defend the country.
What about the fear the army generates?
Is there any one who is not afraid of the army except the known collaborators?
@Single Factor Explanation: Politicising every thing and beyond is the ugly reality.
I wouldn't include politicians in that list. Rest fully agreed.
The esteemed author has written an excellent analysis. On the ongoing politics in the Land of the Pure. And every point that he makes, is remarkably clear and reader friendly. However, there is a Nexus with Bharat in the turmoil in Balochistan and FATA. In both areas, ,issues are instigated, supported, supplied, trained and kept alive by our King Kong neighbor, also known as Bharat. Pakistan would do much much better without Bharat's interference. Since the Vermilion Lord, Modi just took over Kong, it will take a little longer to fix the issues.
Maybe even greater danger also lies in militarizing everything within reach and somethings beyond? Something to ponder about!
Thought provoking article......the fear factor is more a smoke screen raised by our leaders, be they political or military. The real factor to fear is the limitless greed of our leaders. Sir, why did you leave out our religious extremists who literally have put the ' fear of god ' into the people through their ways
So, in reality, we have nothing to fear but fear itself.
A much better write up than previous ones. You stuck to the theme. But I have some issue with your concluding statement: "The danger lies in politicising everything within reach, and some things even beyond. This is not fear, but an ugly reality." Through out your article you argue that fear is the basis of politicizing but here you say "This is not fear, but an ugly reality." Actually, fear is the ugly reality.