As the diseased condition of one organic element in the human body affects the normal functioning of the entire body, the health and well-being of a state also depends on proper functioning of its different organs, all inextricably interconnected with one another in providing and regulating the legal, political, economic and social frameworks for an institutionalised governance, based on rule of law, justice and equality. In our case, unfortunately, with the founder’s early demise, Pakistan was orphaned in its very infancy and lost the promise of a healthy youth with acute systemic deficiencies and normative perversities restricting its orderly natural growth. It went through politico-constitutional delinquencies and economic failures that have no parallels anywhere in the world.
Ours is the story of a society that has been going round and round in aimless circles for the last 67 years. After the Quaid, Pakistan was left without any sense of direction and in a state of political bankruptcy and moral aridity. It started cutting itself into pieces, losing within less than quarter of a century, not only its own half, but also the very rationale that had inspired its creation. The real Pakistan disappeared with its tragic dismemberment and whatever was left has been converted into a land of political merry-go-round by its self-serving, corrupt and incompetent rulers. What an irony that a country which on its birth was considered a “20th century miracle” and which was created entirely through a democratic and constitutional struggle, should still be struggling for genuine democracy, social justice and equal rights for all. Unsure of our future, we are still groping in the dark with one crisis after another and have yet to figure out a sense of common purpose for ourselves as a nation. Absence of real democracy, rule of law and good governance have been our continuing hallmarks. The country has been engaged in a precarious struggle to define a national identity and evolve a political system for its ethnically and linguistically diverse population.
Pakistan is known to have more than 20 languages and nearly 300 distinct dialects. This diversity contributed to chronic regional tensions and provincial disharmony, thus impeding the process of nation-building. Looking at the systems of other developed and developing countries, we find ourselves a unique example of a federation with almost no parallel anywhere in the world. Our present provincial set-up has long been the cause of political instability. It has not only been fuelling misrule and corruption in the country, but also aggravating the sense of inequality and deprivation that exists among the federating units. We are perhaps, the only country in the world with provinces based on ethnicity and language. Also, no country, roughly equal to Pakistan’s geographical and population size has so few and so large provinces. In any unequal set-up, no method of governance will work. There is a strong underlying resentment in Balochistan and in other smaller provinces against what is seen as continued ‘Punjabi dominance’ and inequitable distribution of power and resources. Our Constitution does not provide solutions to the genuine concerns on the inequality of the size of provinces and lopsided sharing of political and economic power. Lately, there have been demands for more provinces on ethnic or linguistic grounds. If this trend were to continue, we will be left with a loosely wired skeleton of a federation with self-serving, disgruntled and corrupt politicians playing havoc with this country. It is a system designed for paralysis, which we are already experiencing. The solution lies in separating governance from ethnic-linguistic considerations by replacing the present four provinces with as many new administratively-determined provinces as necessary, with some balance in their geographical and population size.
Most large and medium-sized countries in the world are divided into small-sized provinces or states as administrative units. For example, China has 34 provinces, India 28 states and seven union territories, Iran 30 provinces, Indonesia 33, Egypt 26, France 26, Germany16, Switzerland 26 cantons, Nigeria 37, Philippines 80, Thailand 78, Turkey 81, the UK 114 counties and the US 50 states. By dividing our country into smaller administrative units as provinces, we would not only be eliminating the causes of regional acrimony and discontent, but also ensuring effective and efficient governance through elected bodies at local and grassroots levels.
Also, given our pathetic performance in our political conduct and discipline since our independence, we, like most developing countries, are perhaps not yet fit for the parliamentary system. Britain struggled for centuries to reach its current parliamentary status. For us, it would be too long and too arduous a journey to be indefinitely chasing illusory goals. Temperamentally, we are a ‘presidential’ nation. It is time we abandoned the system that we have never been able to practise, and explored an adult franchise-based ‘presidential system’ suitably designed for and tailored to Pakistan’s needs.
What, in fact, we need is the remaking of Pakistan as envisioned by the Quaid-e-Azam, free of ethnic and linguistic labels and sectarian, communal and regional disharmony. We must remember that the Pakistan of 1947 could not survive for even 25 years. Despite the 1973 Constitution, the remaining Pakistan continues to face threats of further disintegration, mainly due to unaddressed regional disparities and concerns. Changing faces will not do, nor elections alone will make any difference. The system itself must change.
A wake-up call has already been given, loud and clear, for a new Pakistan. The need for drastic change in our present anachronistic set-up is urgent to get rid of the elitist-led status quo in our country. To avert the vicious cycle of known tragedies, we need a purposeful national debate involving a holistic review of our entire governmental system. A high-powered national commission needs to be tasked to conduct this discourse and evolve a blueprint for remaking of Pakistan through political, economic, judicial, educational, administrative and land reforms.
Reason, not self-serving interests or emotions, will lead us to a new Pakistan.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 25th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (36)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
i hope a situtation does not arise where due to the inability to repack and organize Pakistan comes under the administration of qatar/oman/saudi arabia/kuwait.. to set right and perhaps be a subject of islamic rule.Perhaps this is acceptabe to Pakistan awam. Selling of PIA is a clue.
@bahadur khan: London would be more central for the Prime Minister to organise his private enterprise as well.
Rex Minor
I say we can begin by shifting the capital to a central pakistan location and restarting
This body is already terminally serious ill, perhaps its time to consider Donar options for all its organs ! Perhaps Iran, Afghanistan and India may consider entertaining, the badly flawed experiment that started in 1947, by people who simply lacked basic commonsense or long time vision as to its viability.
@Gp65: I did reply......but ET chose not to print it. To get a better idea suggest read Fahd Husain over the last few weeks in the same Opinion section.
@observer: It seems that Foreign Secretaries are not required to know much about foreign countries.. Well said Sir. No doubt the remark applies to other secretaries and their respective domains.
So many passimists in the comments. What's done is done, no point arguing about what Jinnah did and whether it was good or bad. It has happened, there is a huge country which has millions of people living in it. We should look at the future and make Pakistan a better place to live for everyone - and creation of provinces is one of the many things that would make it so.
Moderator ET- The comment appearing above is definitely not my comment. It seems someone has replaced my comment with this spurious one.
We are perhaps, the only country in the world with provinces based on ethnicity and language.
Really, Mr Foreign Secretary?
Well, among Indian provinces we have Tamilnadu for the Tamilians, Maharashtra for the Marathas, Karnataka for the Kanndigas, Nagaland for the Nagas. In fact even Kashmir has been kept reserved for Kashmiris instead of being flooded with Indians of other ethnicity.
And to put it is a broader perspective, Canada has a FRENCH speaking province called Quebec.
I guess Foreign Secretaries in Pakistan are not required to know much about Foreign Countries.
ET mod, the following is a valid info for the author. There is no doubt about the intellect and emotional intelligence of the author and because of his educated knowledge and experience as a foreign secretary, he has put out more or or less a feasible proposal for the future of his country. However, when he say that" We (Pakistanis) are perhaps, the only country in the world with provinces based on ethnicity and language " then he has definitely missed out very basic of democracy and perhaps this was the failure of hifeasible proposal for the future of his country. However, when he say researchs that We are perhaps, the only country in the world with provinces based on ethnicity and language." We (Pakistanis) are perhaps, the only country in the world with provinces based on ethnicity and language " then he has definitely missed out very basic of democracy and perhaps this was the failure of his Quaid Mr Jinnah, who had not realised that ethnicity and language arethe ver integral part of todays homo sapien which comes before his faith and citizenship. British democracy came about after magna carta and later bill of rights in 1689 which set the scene for all European democracies including the USA which brought their own bill of rights a century later. The citizens and the parliaments or congress were declared uncontested the supreme in a democracy.. The author referred to several countries but he must also research and find out how do the different cantons in switzerland work or the different provinces of the federal republic of Germany function; the word ' solidarity' is the key to the effective governance of the country as a whole.No to Presidential system and yes to the collective leadership of the citizens through the parliament will come out from his research. Good luck for whatever the people at the end decide. No domination of one over other in ethnicity, language or culture!!
Rex Minor
Pakistan's real problem is that it it not a true Islamic state. Once pure Islam, as mandated by the constitution and sharia laws are instituted and enforced, all of Pakistan's problems will be solved.
@ Gp65... good comment. Informative and Enlightening. Keep it up!
"We are perhaps, the only country in the world with provinces based on ethnicity and language"
Wrong. States in India are primarily linguistically based. Where a state with one language is too large and unwieldy, it has further been administratiely divided.
"Pakistan is known to have more than 20 languages and nearly 300 distinct dialects. This diversity contributed to chronic regional tensions and provincial disharmony, thus impeding the process of nation-building" India has far more languages and dialects. It also has a much larger percentage of people that are not from the dominant relgion than does Pakistan. It is not the diversity that causes disharmony but the suppression of diversity e.g. Bengalis were certainly not happy with the imposition of Urdu. There is no harm in people having various identity markers as long as the state does not discriminate against people on the basis of those markers. Discrimination however is baked into the Pakistani constitution - which is unfortunate.
@Parvez : you somehow think Imran is different. Can you ell me why his party is also resisting like ruling parties in all provinces, the holding of provincial elections which are a fundamental aspect of empowerment? How independent was police in KPK when during the blockage of supply routes, it refused o act against PTI law breakers? How independent do you think Imran will allow the police force o be when he does nit hesitate to call police leadership by name and threaten them with dire consequences if he comes to power? How different is he if he has built the party with lotas and waderas from the same status wuo parties that you seem to hate. Be careful what you wish for.
The sad state of Pakistan is visible from the fact that even Indian politicians are seen as sincere and good leaders in comparison to the Pakistani leadership
Whatever may be the reason behind the creation of Pakistan, right or wrong, we have a country. The successive rulers both civilian and military have failed us and now we are fighting for our national existence. Sixty seven years wasted in putting ourselves in anti-India mindset and one-issue, i.e. Kashmir. It is time to rethink what is best for us as a nation and how we can move forward as a multi-ethnic, multi-religious and democratic country. We can do it but we need right civilian leadership with Pakistan in their hearts but not their hands in our depleted national treasury and fancy pedigree.
A new Pakistan needs new thinking and a new mindset, grounded on the basic and abiding principle of welfare of citizens. The first place to start is by rewriting the Constitution, the Soul and backbone of any nation. A reading of a countries Constitution tells us what the priorities of a country are, the values it stands for and where it wants to go. Care has to be taken in drafting such a vital document, if not the nation will stand on crutches forever, if not doomed to fail.
Having smaller provinces is a great idea if the core principle is the devolution of Power, else it will fail to unite the country in any meaningful way. Where I beg to differ is that a young developing country of amazing diversity cannot have a Presidential form of government, because it reflects concentration of Power in a single individual rather than spreading it to every section of the population. Lastly, the nation will remain enfeebled if the population is not disarmed, because Law and Order and the tools of enforcement must remain confined to the Government of the land, else lawlessness will frustrate every goal and objective.
@chemaine majid:: For a lack of a more respectful word, I'd say you are not just delusional, you are totally delusional. All what you said will take about 5 years to achieve? And where in the world are you going to get the money to do all the things you have listed? And will your best friend China give you interest-free debt for 10 years? I better stop now....
First change has to be made to the name Islami Jamhoori Pakistan. This is itself a lie and has never existed in the history of islam. Islam has some elements of democracy in it but as a governing system its not democratic as people of other faiths cannot become leaders in an islami system. So what is it we are looking for? Good capable leaders who can govern or just muslim leaders. What if a christian among the crowd has the credentials. So basically we are missing out. Secondly, all those reforms the gentleman is recommending are true. We need smaller units that are well governed. The current status quo will never deliver it. Democracy is dysfunctional for us as we are not ready for democracy. What would suit us better right now is to have a technocratic govt that will come in and make the changes with military and judiciary on board. Military is part of politics in every country so lets not kid ourselves. Military's role will be to undo their policy of supporting the negative elements that have created havoc in our country and enable the judiciary to give justice without fearing for their lives. The technocrats will have to see to the implemenation of governance along with a fast track approach to reviving the economy and a moratarium on debt servicing for 10 years. Electricity can be imported from neighboring countries and the gas pipeline from Iran pursued vigorously to meet our energy needs so we can be at a comparitive advantage vis a vis exports. Agricultural reforms are the need of the hour as well which will take Pakistan out of poverty. Education has to be on a war footing with modern secular education using modern methodology of teaching. massive investement in teacher training and good pay will achieve the goal.. Only then can Pakistan become a democratic country where state is seperated from religion. This is all step one. To achieve this it will take 5 years minimum.
"which was created entirely through a democratic and constitutional struggle". Looks like the former foreign secretary never heard of direct action day. Such events must have been consigned to the dustbins in the history read by the secretary. One would think there would be a limit to falsifying history and more so in public discourse, but in Pakistan it doesn't appear to be the case.
It was very refreshing to read the comment from Shahid Saleem Arshad of Sydney and Plausible Deniability. The author of this article also in effect confirms that Pakistan should have never been born and for the wrong reasons it was born, it suffers from major structural, foundational, and fundamental problems with which you cannot build a progressive, peaceful, and prosperous state. It is the rotten premise, rotten structure, and therefore nothing but only a failed state and nuisance for the world. Hindsight is 20/20, but I am sure some visionaries even in the years leading up to 1947 saw this coming and yet could not prevent a disaster called Pakistan.
Dipak@Aussie: Jinnah and his family came from a village not far from us in Gujarat. As a child when we visited Moti Paneli, people still remembered him fondly. But overall Jinnah may not have done good in creating Pakistan. While he was politicking for years to get a separate country for Muslims, when the British Government announced the creation of Pakistan, Jinnah was not ready. And Jinnah, his sister Fatima and his Gujarati doctor knew that Jinnah was dying of TB. Sardar Patel and Nehru cunningly agreed to Pakistan while Mahatma Gandhi and Maulana Azad opposed the division of India. The creation of Pakistan was a bad choice. On his deathbed, Jinnah is said to have told Liaquat Ali Khan that creating Pakistan was the biggest blunder of his life. After 67 years it is clear. Every time I walked by Jinnah House in Mumbai (formerly Bombay), I felt tremendous respect for my fellow Gujarati, but Pakistan forgot him quickly after his death. All civilian Prime Ministers except Liaquat Ali Khan turned to be highly corrupt and so were all Military leaders. And then religion twisting Mullaha created by Military helped destroy Pakistan.
Any country that has safe havens for global terrorists and the worst of them are protected in army bases cannot improve. What Gen Zia and his martial law regime has sown is bringing "rich dividends". In a country where minorities and smaller sects of Islam are constantly targeted and running away from Pakistan, only the extremists would take over. Education, secularism and banning of all sectarian organizations is the only solution.
@AVMPolpot: You did not listen to me apparently.I told you to see a neurologist remmember?Now do it before it is too late.
After the Quaid, Pakistan was left without any sense of direction and in a state of political bankruptcy and moral aridity.
Leaving Stanley Wolpert's platitudes about the Quaid aside, the fact is that the turpitude and lack of direction of Pakistan started with the Quaid himself. Right after independence, Jinnah chose to be Governor General rather than hold a democratic position. He usurped Kalat when it is arguable that he could have achieved the same result through persuasion. He dreamed of retiring in Bombay in the house he built "brick-by-brick" and requested Nehru to maintain his residence for him, all of this while orchestrating the 1947 war and knowing full well that he was dying from TB. On one hand, he preached secularism to select audiences while on the other hand, his entire raison d'être was that Muslims cannot live in a system where others could pose a majority.
I read and re-read the article and it made so much sense. I am not sure if Presidential system be better suited for Pakistan with out the checks and balances, it might just lead to some form of autocratic rule if no checks and balances put in because some of our people tend to be more autocratic in nature culturally than believing in democratic socially accepted norms. If I may say that yes, the stronger the local government the better it is for the provinces and country. Yes, it is time to create more provinces, it is a herculean job because the vested interests will fight to the end and may derail any such proposals specially the Punjab to relinquish their monopoly over dominating politically and economically. I will suggest to amend the constitution and shorten the duration and tenure of the NA members to 3years, 2 years for the PAs and 4 years for Senate and the Presidency. Above all there should be direct balloting for the Senate and Presidential elections. Shorting the tenure will make these representatives more accountable to their constituencies. 5 years tenure is a long time in respect to Pakistani politicians, we have seen that after getting themselves elected by what ever means, they act like the masters instead of the servants of the people who sent them there in the first place. To them it is an investment and 5 years is a plenty of time to recover their investments 100 folds, shorten the tenure and hopefully the corruption will decrease too. Thank you for this thought provoking article, I hope those who are clamoring for change will heed your advice or at least look into it.
Jinnah FOUGHT for the faithful and got Pakistan. The faithful are fighting Pakistan to get Sindh, Punjab, Balochistan, FATA, etc. for themselves.
What call of change of status quo is the author talking about? Delusion has limits but the author seems to be crossing the limits of delusion at the speed of light. IK "s wants to change the status quo with turncoats who themselves are feudals. The author wants to put the reasons for all failures of political instability on political parties while ignoring the role of Military in the raising militant Islamic groups, flow of drugs and arms, decades of military rule, appropriation of 20% of budget, militant military running marriage halls, real estate business etc. Most Pakistani's know this, so the revolution never comes, especially if its sponsored by the military like that of IK or Dr. Qadri.
I have in my possession in Sydney a hand written letter by Mr. Jinnah to my
grandfather, with the small pale envelope, embossed Mt. Pleasant Road, Malabar Hills,
also addressed by his hand. My entire family has for ever been in awe of this link,
however minor, to the earlier years of the great man.
In the 30 plus years that I have spent in the USA and Australia, I have found my deep
veneration for him diminish substantially. Perhaps earning advanced engineering
degrees turns one's thinking towards a sceptical, questioning mode. I find that this
mode of thinking is quite alien to the Pakistani masses but also its elite. Almost
everything is based on the belief system, perhaps due to our religion, and received
wisdom and insights are rarely questioned.
Very basic questions have never been asked, let alone satisfactorily answered. As a
Lincoln's Inn trained lawyer, why did Mr. Jinnah not offer a convincing argument in
writing in the ten years prior to 1947? Why did he not write articles, books, take
part in public debates with the leaders of the Indian National Congress. Is it
possible that he was keeping his options open till the very last as to what the British may
ultimately decide. If Pakistan was a treasured goal for which the Muslims of India had
struggled for long, why then was no detailed planning done to secure its rightful
assets, its full entitled territory, and pre-engage Indian Muslims of eminence to the
task.
The strength of his vision could not prevent Mr. Jinnah and his closest confidants and
associates like the PM and the ministers from developing mutual disdain soon after
independence. No one accompanied him on his last trip to Quetta / Ziarat, and no one
was there to be chauffeur driven in air-conditioned comfort to receive the gravely ill
leader from the local Mauripur airfield on 11th September 1948.
Far more competent minds than myself need to apply themselves so that we may find
traces of our original bearings as per the learned author of this article.
-- Aussie: Shahid Saleem Arshad, Sydney
Crooks would not allow Naya Pakistan, if allowed, it would be purana Pakistan.
The moment you link church and state you are doomed. The western countries learned this the hard way through the dark ages and so they have it explicitly in the constitution. Is it a wonder then that all so called oil poor Islamic states today (except maybe Turkey ) where sectarian violence isn't ruling the roost ?
Pakistan in. 67 years resembles a dilapidated structure +++++++++++++++++++++++ Demolition and then reconstruction is called for, according to the learned author.
This guy repackackages all articles on the same theme ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Pakistan the failed state.I protest.
As any marketeer will tell u Pakistan needs a new brand identity ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Pakistan N. N for naya nayab nuclear nawabi nubile...... Pls give ur suggestions or selection.
100% spot on! From four provinces, FATA, Gilgit-Baltistan and Parliamentary system to new many smaller provinces and presidential system respectively, is the only way forward!
It took some 67 years for this handful of some 2000 families to dominate the system so that they could ' loot and plunder ' this nation at will while the people stood around as onlookers .........do you think they will out of the goodness of their hearts give it all up for a principled reason, especially when they all have an exit plan ? No Sir, this will have to taken from them and then reformed.