Pakistan has expressed its willingness for early restoration of ‘peace and tranquility’ along the Line of Control (LoC) and Working Boundary with India, as the two countries on Sunday again traded fire after a two-day hiatus.
As part of diplomatic efforts to defuse the situation, Prime Minister’s Adviser on National Security and Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz spoke to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, according to a statement issued by the foreign ministry.
Aziz briefed the UN chief on the “frequency and intensity of unprovoked and indiscriminate” firing along the LoC and Working Boundary by Indian armed forces over the past few weeks. He underlined the need for early restoration of a ceasefire in the disputed territory.
Over a dozen Pakistani civilians have been killed, while many other injured since the clashes erupted between the two nuclear armed-neighbours on October 2. Both countries accuse each other for triggering the latest hostilities.
Aziz said Pakistan was fully united and determined to thwart any aggression, and had responded to India’s provocations with utmost restraint and responsibility. “India should be advised to adopt a mature and reasonable approach, and refrain its armed forces from acting irrationally,” he was quoted as saying in the foreign ministry statement.
The prime minister’s adviser said there must also be a way forward for resolving outstanding disputes, including the core issue of Jammu and Kashmir, in the interest of durable peace in the region.
He said peaceful settlement of disputes was a cardinal principle of the UN Charter to which Pakistan was deeply committed. “However, progress required cooperation of both sides. Rejecting bilateral dialogue and denying international engagement and legitimacy were unhelpful and counter-productive,” he emphasised. Aziz also underlined the important role of the United Nations to help address the situation and prevent further escalation.
Appreciating the work of the United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP), Aziz noted that its role should be further strengthened to facilitate more effective monitoring and reporting of ceasefire violations.
The UN’s engagement would add to its credibility in managing crisis situations, he added. “The UN should not be inhibited by non-cooperation of one side.”
In his remarks, the UN chief expressed his concern over the escalation of violence along the LoC and deplored the loss of lives. He emphasised the importance of both sides taking necessary steps to de-escalate the situation and resolve all outstanding issues through negotiations, the statement said.
While Aziz raised the issue with the UN chief, Indian forces again resorted to ‘unprovoked firing’ in Pukhlian sector on the Working Boundary near Sialkot.
Pakistan forces effectively responded to the Indian firing, says a statement issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR). According to Rangers’ officials, a civilian, Muhammad Khan, resident of Janglora village in Bajwat sector, received minor injury due to firing by India’s Border Security Force.
Published in The Express Tribune, October 20th, 2014.
COMMENTS (33)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Hassan: So what's stopping u from banning them ???
I am not sure why so many Indians have to come here to comment on a pakistani new website. Don't they have a website of their own.
@Sunil: but you see those who perpetrate such injustices arent always the same who you retaliate towards... Nothing anyone can say can take away your loss but casualties and atrocities have always been suffered on both sides. The oppressor never walks free and is noones friend.
@Sunil: U r a living example that there is no shortage of idiots in India. Pakistan alone is not blessed with them ...
@Sana: Our media is secular rubbish and I do not care what they say. I am a Hindu Kashmiri and I have not forgotten when you did to my family. Do not forget that what you call Pakistan and Bangladesh are occupied India, we have not forgotten. I hope soon your days will be over and as to the resolve of your people, we have stronger motive to win.
Thankyou for enlightening me with your knowledge on the topic. However, in the context it related to the broad objectives of the UN in its peacemaking role. In short, your sarcasm about UN's not needing credibility is unwarranted and adds little to the topic but contempt. @Jor El:
uh haha sure. Who is starting a war anyway. Overconfident. Dont underestimate our people though we seek no war. I dont know whats up with all the hate. I guess its your media that wont stop portraying Pakistanis as weirdos @Sunil:
@AVMPOLPOT Benefits of Dharna will be visible after few months.FO thing good joke.While after 67 years country again goes mad when any tennis star states she doesn't know each in and Times of India still hungry for cleavages of Bollywood actresses
@Sanity: And bully always attack the weak and retreats once given a response.
What do you then call Pakistan which has attacked India four times and surrendered or retreated each time?? Wannabe Bully?
Every country has their responsible army and they are proud of it...but sadly,for my loving fellow neighbours,it's army has a country...feels so pity.God bless u brothers.
Reading the above comments, its quite obvious that Indian responses are full of arrogance and bigotry. I wonder why?
Have they solved their problems that they criticise and insult Pakistan? Why not concentrate on the problem of clean water, lack of sanitation, health, shortage of power and health care. And yes, these are challenges faced by India at a much larger scale than Pakistan. Imagin 700 mill squatting in the open ?? Try drive through Delhi and Mumbay early mori=ning and see the Indian glory out in the open.
India has been a collection of hundreds of RAJS and not a country. Muslim came and made it one country, rules for 800 years and converted half of Hindu into Muslims. This is the fact Indian can't live with.
The best way forwatrd is peace. Either learn to live with peace, or be ready for war. Option is yours.
Pakistani leaders have shown too much restrains compared to Indian threats and insulting statements from BJP leaders. They behave like bullys. And bully always attack the weak and retreats once given a response.
Pakistan "offers"???? Should not it be "requested" ?
@Haider: India Pakistan next 67 years +++++++++++;++++;;; India will be a super power Pakistan would befocussed at D Chowk. Tussle would be between grand children of NS and IK. FO would be writing to UN....its been 134 years......
Our Govt is disregarded everywhere. No one cares for Nawaz Govt going to UN. For last months, our Govt went to UN almost on daily basis. Anything happened? Nothing. Zilch. Only if our military goes then the UN knows that the real power behind this border conflict is talking. But will it change much? This is the tragedy of Pakistan.
It appears that the cost of escalation is becoming unaffordable?
@Rishabh Jain: No one from India is trumpeting. If Pakistan stops firing, there would be no reason for India to respond. However what Pakistan wants is resoration of status quo it had with Congress wherein it could.start firing and then by implicitly threatening escalation to a nuclear war and also threatening to internationalise the issue - India is the one who would sue for peace. The NDA government has decided to call their bluff and made it clear that if Pakistan starts firing, it will give a disproportionate response and firing will only stop when Pakistan stops firing. It is better to establish groundrules once and for all which is much better for civilians on both sides, rather han have a replay every few months as has been the case.
@Sana Azhar: Half-knowledge of the UN's functions doesn't help darling. Under Chapter VI, the UN may offer advice/recommendations if both parties agree for the same.
Sartaz Azizs Phone Bill +++++++++++++++++ Is attracting attention at IMF.
Actually pakistan and UN (i.e. libiya, syria, iraq, palestine) are in same situation no one listen to them. Moon and Aziz have lots of free time can write and reply everyday.
I do not agree that this a thing for trumping their egos. If Pakistan stops firing, well, that is awesome and I am happy they stopped firing. Civilians on both sides were suffering and any effort to de-escalate tensions is more than welcome.
@Jor El: Absolutely. It is part of UN's functions.
@asim: strong responses are given by nation who stand on their own feet, Pakistan is crawling right now.
The international community knows about the games Pakistan plays. They don't care when Pakistan complains. Truth is a rare commodity in Pakistan and everybody knows it.
A very sensible move from Pakistan. While each side accuses the other of escalation in tension, only a neutral body can decide who is at fault.
Both side of the civilian governments and respectively Pakistan National Assembly and Indian Parliament Passed their own resolution over Kashmir and we should see as stated position of both side of the people and give respect to that. What else we can talk about Kashmir. Any change in the position then pass another resolution in the respective parliaments and convey that to each other country. that's all we can do. Now we can concentrate on some other issue since we are neighbor
Sartaj Aziz needs to speak to Raheel Sharif if he wants de-escalation. As long as Pakistan does not stop its adventurism, the response from India will not change. Calling Ban Ki Moon repeatedly will do little to change the situation.
@Asim, it is the army and not the PM who is in charge of Pakistan's security policies and foreign policies specially with regards to India, USA and Afghanistan. Any blame therefore should be directed to the correct quarters.
@Jor El: even if it needed to prove its credibility then Syria, Iraq, Libya, Palestine, Israel, Ukraine, Russia are the platforms to do so.
No one believes Pakistani's and no matter what you say the UN will not interfere, in the end we as Indians can out do you in every way. If you want a war just start it and we will finish it, if you want to use nuclear weapons we will make sure there is no Pakistan. We dare you to try and then you will see how we deal with you.
"The UN’s engagement would add to its credibility in managing crisis situations, he added." I ddnt know that the UN was looking for a certification of credibility.
Those who escalated the tension are offering to de-escalate. Cant digest the response for the escalation, is it??