Pakistan used terror as a hedge: Clinton

Clinton says Pakistan used terrorist outfits against its neighbours to not have its position undermined by them.


November 14, 2010

WASHINGTON:


Pakistan has supported terror outfits as a hedge against India and an unfriendly Afghan regime in the past, said US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton in an ABC News interview, the transcripts of which were released by the state department.

“By supporting groups that will be their proxies, Pakistan has tried to prevent India or an unfriendly Afghan regime to undermine its position,” she said. However, Clinton said that things are changing and that she can no longer confirm whether Pakistan is still using terror as a weapon against India and Afghanistan.

The US secretary of state accepted that the US had created certain radical outfits and supported terrorists like Osama bin Laden to fight against the erstwhile Soviet Union, but that the backing had boomeranged. “Part of what we are fighting against right now, the United States has created. We created the Mujahideen force against the Soviet Union. We trained them, we equipped them, we funded them, including Osama bin Laden. But it did not work out so well for us,” she said.

Clinton said that Pakistan is paying a “big price” for supporting the US war against terror groups. “I think it is important to note that as they have made these adjustments in their own assessments of their national interests, they are paying a big price for it. It is not an easy calculation to make. But we are making progress in Afghanistan. We have a long way to go and we cannot be impatient. Well, the headlines are bad. We are going home. We cannot do that.” Appearing on the same ABC show, Secretary of Defence Robert Gates said that Pakistan has withdrawn an equivalent of about six divisions of its army from the Indian border and moved them to attack the Taliban. “They are attacking the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan and their safe havens that are a problem for us,” he said. “But there is a trust deficit in both the countries. Pakistan and Afghanistan believe that we walked away from them at the toughest moments of their history. You cannot recreate that trust in a heartbeat,” he added. Gates acknowledged that both the countries are worried that US would leave whether problems in Afghanistan are solved or not, leaving “whatever remains in their hands to deal with”.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 14th, 2010.

COMMENTS (48)

Irfan R | 13 years ago | Reply Despite all the doomsday scenarios presented about Pakistan by the local and international press, Pakistan has a surprisingly resilient economy. Despite the battering the economy has taken by the floods and increased terrorism, our fiscal deficit is only 4.7 percent compared to India's 5.2 percent. Of course, I am not for a moment suggesting that fiscal deficit is the only yardstick for economic health. But it certainly is an important one. Pakistan's main problem is returning the economy back to higher growth while keeping inflation in check. (Not the type of synthetic growth the economy went through in the Musharraf era.) Bringing in foreign investors is another problem given the battering Pakistan's image has taken overseas over the last 2 years. It would help if the military and intelligence agencies keep this in mind before tapping into their 'strategic assets'. Pakistan has the ability to play with the regional big-boys if only we focus on growth and not on the military. Pakistan's blessing and scourge are both with the military. They eat up way too much of the resources and are seemingly insatiable. But on the flip side, if the present state of affairs continues for another 5 years, we'll look back at today as the golden era of Pakistan. Rehman Malik's embarrassing request at the International Lenders' meet to write off Pakistan's external debt of $50 billion was almost a body-blow for Pakistan's chances of raising money to tide over the current crises. Fortunately Dr.Adbul Hafeez set the record straight and told the members that Pakistan was not seeking debt writeoff. What was that man doing in an economic summit anyway?
Ashutosh | 13 years ago | Reply Dear Henna Khan, Karzai won election twice. Democratically elected president. He won, inspite of US not likely him. In that sense he represents Afghanistan. About those who never won elections but still claim to be Representatives have doubtful credentials. Regards
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ