When asked during the daily briefing whether the US still supports Nawaz Sharif despite allegations that the May 2013 elections were a fraud, US State Department spokesperson Marie Harf said that “Well, yes, we still do. He is the elected leader. We’ve said that repeatedly...”
Pressed about Imran Khan's allegations that the 2013 elections were fraud and fake, Harf insisted on the US view. “We have said that Nawaz Sharif is the elected leader of Pakistan.”
“We’ve consistently said that the US encourages all the parties to work together to resolve their differences through dialogue; also, though, oppose any efforts to impose extra-constitutional change to the democratic system,” Harf added.
She said the US continues to carefully monitor the demonstration and that the US ambassador is in contact with Pakistani officials.
Senior al Qaeda leadership in Pakistan 'taken off the battlefield'
In light of the new video released by al Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri, in which he announced a new branch in the Indian subcontinent, the US said it was not able to verify the 'propaganda announcement' and reiterated that the senior leadership in Pakistan and Afghanistan had been decimated.
“It’s al Qaeda senior leadership in the tribal areas primarily of Pakistan, also some in Afghanistan, and that core leadership has been decimated. That’s a fact,” she said.
Asked about the message of the video, Harf insisted that the US had not been able to verify whether it signified the launch of any new capabilities.
“We haven’t been able to verify that yet. Obviously, we’re looking to see if there’s more information we can get about this here. We have remained committed to dismantling al Qaeda anywhere that it poses a threat to the United States, make sure it doesn’t again pose a threat to the United States, particularly in that region. We also don’t regard this announcement as an indication of any new capabilities by al Qaeda.”
When pressed on how she could dismiss the video, Harf said they had not been able to verify so far that “there’s actually some sort of new group out there that is in any way active.”
“The core of al Qaeda’s leadership except for Zawahiri, of the senior leadership in al Qaeda in Pakistan, has been taken off the battlefield.”
To prover her point, Harf pointed towards the series of successions of number threes in al Qaeda, a host of other senior leaders in al Qaeda who had been killed and how these leaders had been replaced with new fighters who were less capable, significantly less trained, they had much less capability.
However, Harf admitted that there is al Qaeda presence in other parts of the region. “That’s not anything new. But in terms of an announcement about some sort of new branch, we judge – the US government judges that this is not an indication of new capabilities. We have nothing to indicate that there are new capabilities here.”
COMMENTS (30)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@imran ali: 1) There are many views on the Pakistani Democratic System at work since its independence. 2) Army taking over the Power, more times than usually happens in a Democracy, which disallows the true Representatives of People to govern it. 3) So, despite difference of opinions, prevailing at various quarters within and outside Pakistan, any Democratic govt. would want to support (even if orally) the Democratically Elected Regime on the Day - not just in Pakistan but elsewhere too. 4) As for USA fiddling with Democratically Elected govts. as despots and supporting the worst dictators has been happening for as long as it started competing in Colonization with Western Europe. 5) To the outsiders including me, how Pakistan work with its Democratic Establishment is purely an internal affair of majority of Pakistan's People. :)
@M.P.Rao and American supporting Nawaz Shareef ?
@sardarzaheer: If you had protested when USA was supplying Funds, Training Experts, Arms, Equipments & Intelligence for / on Afghanistan - to replace that Soviet backed Communists regime - with Taliban & al Quaeda Combine, they would've minded their business since then and no need of cribbing on it now.
Those asking US to mind its business - US has not interfered in any way. She was ASKED a question and she responded.
This response eill have no impact on PAT or PTI supporters. It will however impact the 3rd umpire which may pull back its hand. If that happens, then that is the interference in political process which will stop.
Yes Uncle Sam always supports Puppet Democracies like Iraq and Afghanistan
Given US foreign fiasco such as arming ISIS to teeth and looking like a lost child for "coalition of willing" to defeat them. Blindly siding with Israel and now poll shows HAMAS will trounce Fatah in West Bank this idiot response is no surprise. And who are they going to blame for all this ..... you guessed it Muslims.
Who the heck is US to endorse PAKISTANI elected members???
With this news Nawaz is trying to say that he is in power with American Blessing???
Dear Americans can you please mind your own business...and do not support just parliament but the people
Your election was monitored and approved by outside observers (everywhere but Balochistan, FATA and Karachi) - and they said it was fine. As such, America supporting your elected leaders seems the appropriate response.
United States always support corruption and corrupt leader in The Pakistan because US can't achieve his goal with out these corrupt leaders
Madam, thou dust protest too much.
@Hornet: Never.
@Earth on Fire: Because USA doesn't support the Anarchists on the Street!
Why Elected Leader as written in quotes? 'Elected leader' shows the media bias towards NS. I dont expect ET to be brainless Inqalaab newspaper who considers IK's 33 seats were 133 actually.
@Raj: Pakistan is really ruling your heart. Why then would you be on a Pakistani website?
Thanks Obama administration, please continue to support democracy in Pakistan
Why US support the looters and thugs of Pakistan,?
1) USA has taken a very good decision in supporting the Democracy in Pakistan. 2) Both Imran Khan & Tahir ul-Qadri never enjoyed popular support of the Pakistani Voter. 3) Their Baton-wielding supporters fighting on streets with the Police are ample evidence that they are hellbent on creating Anarchy in Pakistan so that the Army may take over the government, yet again! 4) Both the National Parliament & Supreme Court of Pakistan have refused to support this Anarchy on Streets and supported the Democratic System of Pakistan! 5) Sincerely hope, the Army of Pakistan too respects both the Public Sentiment of Pakistan and that of the International Community.
US support for our 'elected leader' would have carried some weight if they perhaps supported ALL elected leaders - but they don't. Their hands are a little dirty on this one!
Jen Pasaki puts on glasses and she becomes Marie Harf? Take the glasses off and Marie becomes Jen? It's the same woman running back and forth between two Departments? What is going on here?
This in itself is a good enough reason to throw out Nawaz Sharif
Its amazing they are going beserk over these protests yet they havent condemned govt inability to resolve these protests or the violence of police. `Merican democracy at its best!
Why they just cant do their own business????? Their economy needs more attention of them.
This one statement is enough to send the agencies scurrying back into their basement.
Yeap.. elections were rigged now that America has confirmed it!
Now that your pay masters, the payers for your bills have spoken you Paks have to accept the ruling. Lol. You WILL Obey your masters.