Political parties and anarchy
Whether IK and TuQ get elected is of no consequence, history will record their contribution for meaningful change.
Historically progressive, Pakistan’s bourgeoisie has compromised with imperialism and feudal/tribal elements, with almost all political parties in Pakistan run like feudal estates. The basic ingredient of any functioning democracy, the present form of elections has reduced the Parliament to a mere ritual-like exercise with those elected considering power a free licence to loot, plunder and oppress the people for the next five years. To quote my article of May 5, 1995 titled, Direct Vote and Democracy, “other than bad advice our political leadership depends upon ‘special interest groups’ (and individuals) for survival once they are in office rather than on the electorate that voted them into office.” Accountability being the touchstone of democracy, consider the public apathy towards rampant nepotism and corruption, resigning us to tolerate the blatantly corrupt as the ‘guardians of democracy’. Former president Zardari’s mantra about ‘dialogue, dialogue, dialogue’ conveniently ignores the missing $60 million in Swiss accounts. Shedding crocodile tears about democracy, why does Khursheed Shah not lose any sleep over Zardari’s penchant for ‘corruption, corruption and more corruption’? Discarding the 12th century ‘majoritarian’ or first-past-the-post (FPTP) system, many newly emerging democracies labelled it unsatisfactory, it is under reform in many countries. A constituency has 100 eligible voters and 10 candidates. ‘A’ gets 11 votes, ‘B’ nine, ‘C’ eight others 10 each. Assuming 100 per cent participation, someone wins the election with 11 per cent of the vote with 89 per cent against. If only 40 per cent of eligible voters vote, roughly the norm for Pakistan, the winning candidate could win with even five per cent of those eligible. The Supreme Court (SC) ruled in June 2012 in the Workers’ Party Case that the British model FPTP system violated the principle of majority (citing over 40 per cent of races in the 2008 elections won with under 50 per cent of the vote and be replaced “to ensure true representation of the people and rule of the majority” by switching to “proportional representation” and consider adopting “run-off voting” for single seat elections, a second round being held if no candidate gets a clear majority. Governance by local bodies, the very basis of democracy, is criminally ignored by anyone coming to power. In Civil Appeal 297 of 2014 on March 19, 2014, the SC held that delaying local bodies elections for nine years violated the Constitution, directing the provincial governments to frame laws within 45 days i.e., by May 3, 2014 and the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to hold local bodies elections within five months from March 19, 2014 (expired on August 18, 2014). Before correcting the inherent defects in the electoral rolls, a national census (last in 1998) must also correct the glaring anomalies in delimitation, allowing only plus/minus 15 per cent deviation, e.g. rural constituencies in Sindh have about 15,000 voters compared to 45,000 in Karachi. Major electoral reforms should include all elections including the Senate by direct vote, aspirants must first get elected at the basic community level but cannot compete for more than one seat and must be registered income tax payers giving proof of residence with local taxes paid for at least three years (declaration of assets and that of their immediate family reconciling with their known sources of income). The winner must get more than 50 per cent majority, otherwise the first two candidates go through run-off elections. Moreover, elections to the assemblies and the Senate must be preceded by local bodies elections. With individual stakeholders self-governing at the grass roots level. No assembly should last for more than four years. Twenty-five per cent seats in the assemblies above the present composition should be on the basis of proportional representation of party voters cast and similarly 25 per cent reserved for the losing female candidates on party basis. The presidential elections must be by direct vote with candidates from political parties having not less than 10 per cent of the popular vote in the National Assembly elections, the governors of provinces being similarly elected and accountability of all aspirants is crucial with initial scrutiny to be followed by a detailed one. Every institution of the state has been subjected to muckraking, an increasingly corrupted media taking vicarious pleasure scurrilously targetting the superior judiciary and the armed forces. The moral authority of the government having been virtually destroyed, the credibility of democracy is in tatters. National security does not comprise guarding our territorial boundaries against external aggression and/or fighting internal strife, what about the massive erosion of societal security? Administrative breakdown could lead to anarchy, the ongoing terrorism could degenerate into an internecine civil war. Look at Libya, Syria, Iraq, etc! My humble suggestions on various TV channels to resolve the present crisis, viz (1) the Punjab chief minister must resign for an impartial investigation into the June 17 Model Town incident. A judicial commission must investigate the 2013 electoral rigging and dissolve the president Cabinet. Mian Nawaz Sharif should form an all-political parties’ national government, the National Assembly having a one-point agenda of enacting political reforms within 30-40 days and there is moral and legal basis thereafter to dissolve the assemblies, transitioning to a caretaker regime (appointed by the SC to avoid controversy) to hold elections. Fundamental reform of the electoral process must reflect true democracy starting from the grass roots level. Whether Imran Khan and Tahirul Qadri get elected or not is of no consequence, history will record their contribution as catalysts for wholesale and meaningful change. Published in The Express Tribune, September 4th, 2014. Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
killing 14 innocent citizens is something worse than anarchy. The current system unfortunately only represents such bad governance.
This system is hijacked by the political elite, people who do not represent the masses. The decision makers who gamble the future of our nation for mere pennies. Killing 14 innocent citizens is something worse than anarchy. The current system unfortunately only represents such bad governance and the author has given excellent ideas to improve the existing system!
There is much substance in much of what the PTI and PAT are saying.........its a shame that the government has stuffed cotton wool in their ears in an attempt to keep reality out......definitely not a mature strategy.
One of the best articulated and educational op-eds i have tread in this paper.
U guys deserve NS! It is economy, stupid...which is state super-structure not democracy.
Kudos to u. Excellent narrative. Must be implemented.
@Allah Daad Those thugs in assembly all want to hold their reign so that their lineage continues to prosper at the cost of the common man and they bank on foolishness of people like you. We already live in anarchy where law and justice is only for the powerful and corrupt politicians. What other means remained for those women and children of getting justice when the law minister was directly involved in the massacre?
fully agree with the columnist; controlling corruption and strengthening democracy will certainly benefit us all. It will also reduce need for private security companies who provide security services to these corrupt but wealthy people. These security companies,ironically, mushroomed during 'clean' administration of Gen Zia ul Haq(RH)
@saad: There was Martial Law in Pakistan and buck stopped at his table. If he chose to listen to any politicians the fault lies in him, because there was no legal compulsion to listen to illegal advice when the elections were won by the majority in East Pakistan. Power come with responsibility and responsibility rested with Yahya.
Anarchy occurs when baton carrying crowd armed with hammers, wire cutters, axes and cranes are backed by warlords or even those groups armed by the state to protect the constitution dare to openly challenge the constitution, parliament, judiciary and other symbols of state. What this self assumed analyst writes is basically to encourage anarchy. Either you have Rule Of Laws or Rule of Jungle. Nobody including PM, CM, serving bureaucrat or khaki should be above the law. The CM Punjab must be accountable for use of excessive force in Model Town Lahore by his administration, so must be those under whose watch over 70 Pakistani citizens were brutally murdered in Karachi on 12 May, or for muderers of Bugti, members of Hazara community, and rape of Dr Shazia Khalid etc etc it is a long list of abuses which if not contained and stopped will destroy Pakistan from within and make it into another Somalia. As it is citizens and government servants are being subjected to harassment by Danda carrying vigilantes in Red Zone and the business of state and its nerve centre hostage to them, yet the state is being asked not to resort to use of violence, when the state alone has the sole legitimate authority and monopoly over use of force. This was not the state created by Quaid e Azam, nor were these institutions funded by tax payer to humiliate the constitution whenever it suits them.
@Ali you give an expression that Mr Sehgal is the last card left for ET to play with. The debate about losing East Pakistan has many faces and the role of politicians cannot be ignored. A civilian leader's ego came in the way at that time. Its a question of saving democracy which doesn't mean lying on the floor of the house by the incumbent PM as we all saw last week. Army didn't ask for the implementation of article 245 it was the prerogative of the politicians to halt and resolve the issue in hand before the protesters took on the streets.
The problem with lip service to values is that it does nothing to change the situation on the ground. It feels good to listen to fiery speeches. Beware you all don’t fall for a sales pitch. There will be lot of time to regret later. Hold these parliamentarians accountable or bury democracy.
@nadeem: another life suffereing from conspiracy syndrome...
Kudos to you Sir! For open advocacy of Imran and Qadri is not mainstream these days. I only wish the proponents of these two would settle upon the SC's adjudication of facts regarding electoral rigging. If they refuse, how can we be sure there wouldn't be controversy afterwards as to the Supreme Court's supremacy as the impartial judge.
When PM's intellectual father, General Zia was in power, the protesters took over the secretariat and burned American Embassy in the capital that too is written in history. Zia called in the army but did not use force against the protesters. So technically, it's all about endorsing real democracy because the constitution doesn't protect the bourgeoisie it protects us from them. In my opinion the article projects the need for strengthening democracy.
Any system built on weak foundations is bound to collapse with passage of time. Mr. Ikram Sehgal is absolutely right in pointing out the fundamental flaws with our electoral process and we have repeatedly witnessed the inevitable disasters that inevitably follow these flawed exercise which mostly end up in stealing mandate of the people rather than empowering them. The current ganging up of the beneficiaries of the existing order to save a corrupt government that has literally lost all moral authority to rule is not because of any love for respecting the aspirations of the people, sadly it is to keep the in vogue system of selling favours intact. Imran Khan and Tahir Ul Qadri are being cornered as they have achieved something never witnessed before. Imran is making the most serious attempt in the history of the country to empower the people of Pakistan by demanding electoral reforms. Ever since its adoption the 1973 constitution has been violated by strongmen. While the act of abrogation of the sacrosanct document cannot and should not be condoned,it is worth an elaborate academic inquiry to find out the reasons for these repeated accidents in our national history. To expect that Pakistan will realise the dream of becoming a true democracy while clinging to its deeply flawed electoral process is nothing more than chasing an ever elusive mirage.
@Qabil Khan: This establishment hack was arguing the other day with Barrister S M Zafar over interpretation of constitution and Article 245. I fail why ET should allow him such space?. Perhaps ET has no choice and this is the balancing act. Anarchy has set in Pakistan because of men like him, who consider constitution just a piece of paper and for whom this country is there to serve them. There is no doubt that CM Punjab can be asked to resign on moral grounds, but what about the moral obligations of those responsible for murder of 60 persons in Karachi on 12 May, or the rape of Shazia Khalid, the murder of Bughti and the massacre of Hazara community. Till this day we have failed to hold accountable trigger happy persons responsible for denying to Bengali majority their right to form government in 1970 and instead launch a military campaign.
@nadeem if it was a scripted puppet show, even then the civilian Prime Minister we currently have goes to the army to save his throne, and then he isn't courageous enough to admit it either
History will record that these two gentlemen played out a puppet show scripted by the military in order to protect its own interests.
Anarchy sets in when men bearing arms prevail over laws and come up with arguments such as to save the state, suspend the constitution. The Quaid wanted a constitutional modern democratic welfare state and his vision was subverted by Ghulam Mohd in league with Ayub and Sikander Mirza.
Anarchy sets in when the social contract called Constitution, which binds political parties, citizens, paid civil and security establishment,state and non state actors to their confined designated roles is violated by any one. This argument to suspend, subvert Constitution or the social contract in order to save state is counter to the vision of men like Quaid e Azam, Lincoln, George Washington, Hazrat Umer etc and this is what leads to anarchy. It is the sole monopoly of state to use force as per rules and restrictions imposed by Constitution, to enforce writ of laws, not the whims of individuals, or their version of much abused term national security. When the paid institutions of the state, funded by tax payers, assume unto themselves a role, which is not their designated function, it leads to anarchy. Those who decided to outsource security by creating armed groups to achieve their distorted version of state security are as much reonsible for anarchy as the Taliban, or sectarian and ethnic groups which were allowed to carry arms. Pakistan was created by a political struggle waged by men of honor and integrity and not through an armed struggle. It would have functioned in accordance with wishes of Quaid, had adventurers like Ayub not conspired with bureaucracy and remnants of British Raj such as Unionists to grab power and prevent constitutional rule to gain a foothold in this country.
I appreciate your oped, the problem is that most of these political parties are dynastic and they are the ones who make laws when they are in the NA or Senate to perpetuate their dominance regardless how corrupt they are, they think people has short memories and most likely they do. I will even go further to curtail the tenure for Senate, NA and PAs, 4,3 and 2years respectively, this will in turn change the master-servant relationship because the elected ones will be more responsive to the electorate. 5 years is a very long time specially for Pakistani political system. Further more, party heads should not be the one to grant so called tickets for candidates but there should be primary elections in the party and the best candidate run against who ever is running from another party. You have some excellent suggestions and ideas which are based on democratic principles but any one is heeding the advice, I would not hold my breath for that to happen. A good friend of mine the late Victor Vermillion used to tell be about the politicians that can any one pull the pigs from the trough of the sloth. Try it and the pigs will be attacking you. So it is hard to reform because the whole system needs overhauling and who will be patriotic enough to do it. I hope it is done In my life time.
Ah the Establishment hack utters his usual viewpoint....