One hopes this is not the case when it comes to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)’s dissident president Javed Hashmi, who on September 2, delivered as stern a message to the entire political system of the country. Hashmi’s speech during the joint session of Parliament should serve as an eye-opener for all sides involved in this current crisis. He lashed out at what he termed the ineffectiveness of the Parliament and its members’ preoccupation with personal political battles instead of serving the people who elected and sent them there. The Parliament, he said, is indeed the most supreme and sacred of institutions, but it hasn’t been used to alleviate the troubles of millions of Pakistanis as it should. Instead, it has, for years, been used by those in power to serve political ends — as it is currently being used. “Prime ministers, once elected, wish that Parliament would just disappear,” thundered an emotional Hashmi. No one will disagree with that. Respect for institutions, no matter how sacred, will not simply stem from grand superlatives and lofty ideals, or from repetition of their sanctity, but from efficiency and indeed efficacy in the eyes of the people they are meant to serve. This is particularly so in a country such as Pakistan, which suffers from multiple socio-economic afflictions.
The seasoned politician from Multan lost his place in the PTI because he went public with his disagreement with the party chief’s strategy during this now 19-day protest, but he stepped onto the floor of the Assembly to effectively present Imran Khan’s case — and voiced concerns with the decorum of the current government. He urged caution and reformation — particularly in the way Parliament is run and how the prime minister conducts himself. Some of the speeches that came before him took aim at Imran Khan, who is technically still a member of the National Assembly. Many of the points raised against him were personal and political attacks — particularly by his arch-rival Maulana Fazlur Rehman, who called for Imran to be tried for treason. But Hashmi urged that the Parliament should not attempt to corner and isolate Imran Khan, pointing to his genuine support amongst millions. Defending the PTI chief, he said that the one that should be put on trial should not be Imran Khan, but Parliament itself. One may disagree with Imran Khan’s methods and words, but the answer to how the current crisis will be resolved will not come from attacking the PTI chief. The Parliament needs to play a bigger role than that.
The support put forward for beleaguered Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif for the sake of democracy and democratic principles — as Aitzaz Ahsan beautifully articulated in his speech — is very welcome. He is, after all, the elected prime minister. But, let it not end at this. Let Parliament step forward as a platform that is not simply used to prop up a government and attack dissident forces at times of crisis. Let Parliament come forward and resolve this and remind the country why it is so sacred and important. Thus far, the army and the Supreme Court have tried to play a role in solving this matter. For one, this is the job of neither, and least of all to offer directions to an elected government. The army has too long had a political role, and while its current stand supporting democracy (though not, as some would say, in 1958, 1977 and 1999) is commendable, it is perhaps not for them to advise an elected government on political matters — particularly in public statements on policy issues such as time frames for resolution of issues and whether or not force should be used, such as the ones we have seen of late. It will be said that there were failed attempts by political players to resolve this matter. While these efforts are commendable, they have come from the platform of political parties thus far. Parliament as an institution has thus far done little but pass resolutions in favour and against people. Let the rut end at this critical hour.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 3rd, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
We may argue endlessly in favor of the democracy, but remember any system be that democracy, monarchy, martial law, etc. is meant for the people. Democracy in our country continues to fail its people. There is no justice, food, education and shelter for the people while a small cliché prosper unbridled and the laws are applied to the poor only.
@Robert Steive Exactly my sentiments. We are willing to side with this corrupt system at the cost of our people, like we have since 1947. Unfortunate!
@Mirza:
You, sir, said the golden words !
It is very strange that 11 political parties are siding with PM to rescue the dismally failed and corrupt political system, that could not resolve the problems of Pakistanis for 66 years. These parties are in politics totally for self-aggrandisement and personal interest. Javed Hashmi rightly questioned PM that you are ruling for 31 years and people's problems are not alleviated. He should also put another question that how manifolds PM's personal wealth and possessions increased in 31 years. If no body heeded to the demands of these peaceful protesters, then we should wait for very violent and murderous protesters in near future. Moreover, this Parliament never ever held a joint session to address the hardships and problems of common people of Pakistan. While writing these line, I watched a ticker on TV that 43 paisa per unit has been increased for the domestic user of 50 unit electricity. Congrats to all supporters of this system and all the 11 parties for saving this corrupt system and PM. So carry on election rigging, extortion, corruption in every field and I fear one day we would be on par with Palestinians because we are looting our own motherland and not moving to clean, accountable, just , equal rights for all democracy, that is the only way of salvation for us.
There are winners and there are losers and then there are eternal losers. Some of the leaders are good and some not so. Some are elected and some are eternal losers. Being the oldest and lifetime leader IK can never win plurality by representing elites only. At much younger age both Sharif and Zardari have achieved that IK has been dreaming for two decades. This has been the best ever showing by IK in any elections. He has failed miserably to improve KPK province and make any impact in the assemblies. The only way for him is to base his fate on the losers like Qadri, Rashid Tully, Choudhries and other lotas. However zero plus zero plus zero is still zero. NA and Senate did a great job by siding with the supremacy of constitution and not individuals who are lusting for power.