The United States has asked European countries to supply arms and ammunition to Kurdish forces, US and European officials have said.
Premier David Cameron has so far said Britain's response would be limited to a humanitarian effort, but London has also been transporting to Kurdish forces military supplies, such as ammunition, being provided by other nations.
"If we were to receive a request then we would consider it positively," the spokesperson said on Friday.
"Our understanding is that they prefer to operate kit that they are trained on, and so that's why so far it has been us transporting supplies from other countries."
Several European governments, including France, Germany, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands, have said they will send arms to the Kurds or are considering doing so.
In a statement following a meeting of the British government's Cobra emergency committee on Thursday, London confirmed it would continue transporting military equipment from Eastern Europe to the Kurdish forces.
The BBC earlier quoted Downing Street sources as saying that the Kurds had not yet asked Britain for direct help but that any request would be considered with an open mind.
The fighters of Iraq's semi-autonomous Kurdish region are struggling against better-armed militants from the Islamic State group, which has swept across northern Iraq in recent weeks, pushing back Kurdish forces and driving tens of thousands of minority Yazidis and Christians from their homes.
European Union foreign ministers will hold an emergency meeting on Friday to discuss the region's response to major crises including the conflict in Iraq, the EU said on Wednesday.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Interesting, pl start supplying weapons to Phalistine people also to defend themselves from Israeli aggression.
Note the fallout from Team Obama's foreign policy of "first, do no harm" which has lately veered sharply into "do nothing much at all" !!!'
@vinsin:
But the difference is where they got the arms, before such killings take place violence was at a minimum. Arms do act as prime catalyst in proxy wars. By all means, kill all the IS one can. I have zero love for their barbaric nature but be ready to live with the consequences as well of supplying arms to everyone you feel like it.
@Azi: If kashmiri muslims kills kashmiri pandit with the arms of Britian then also Kashmiri Muslims will be responsible. It is the people who kill people not the weapon.
@unbelievable:
Its funny because the very same IS was previous recipient of arms and finance in Syria. I wonder how different your stance would be if one day britian decided to arm kashmiri rebels. Indians usually post first think later.
@Azi:
USA prevented Saddam from slaughtering the Kurds - their not going to allow ISIS to slaughter them either. It's ISIS/Islamic Nation that deserves the criticism - not the USA, UK or anyone else who wants to help the Kurds.
More like always ready to incite wars, seems they didn't learn much from Iraq.