However, I crossed the border 32 days after independence. By then, the fury of killing and looting had subsided. I did not see Hindus and Muslims quarrelling or actually fighting. I saw the pain-etched faces — men and women, with their meagre belongings bundled on their heads and the fear-stricken children following them. Both Hindus and Muslims had left behind their hearth, homes, friends and neighbours. Both had been torn on the rack of history. Both were refugees.
The tragedy of Partition is too deep to be described in words. But to convert it into a Hindu and Muslim question is politicising the problem. Unfortunately, this will whip up hatred against Hindus, who were as much at the receiving end in Pakistan as were Muslims in India.
Why were the people, who coexisted for so many years, now killing each other? Nothing would be more futile than the effort to pin down who was responsible for the partitioning of the subcontinent. With the sequence of events stretching back for over six decades, such an exercise can only be an academic study.
History’s ‘ifs’ are at best hypothetical and at worst subjective. The Partition was like the Greek tragedy. All knew what was happening. Still they could do nothing to check it. The climate in the country had become too polluted to escape the carnage and the migration that came in its wake.
Has partition served the purpose of Muslims? I do not know. During my trips to that country, I have heard people saying that they are happy that at least they have “some place” where they feel secure, free of Hindu domination or Hindu aggression. But I feel that the Muslims as Muslims have been the biggest losers. They are now spread over three countries — India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Imagine the influence that their numbers — their votes — could have commanded in the undivided subcontinent! They would have been nearly one-third of the total population.
I have returned disheartened from the Wagah-Amritsar border, not because there is no lessening of martial posture of soldiers at the sunset parade, but because of a new monstrosity that has come up there. The Pakistani authorities have projected figures in carving on boards to show how Hindus and Sikhs had killed and looted Muslims during the Partition. The reliefs have been displayed in such a way that they are visible only from the Indian side. They cannot be seen from the Pakistan side because the back of the reliefs are merely large bill boards.
The happenings depicted are offensive in expression and deprave in purport. They have been installed in the last two months, probably because the voice of peace with India is gaining strength in Pakistan and because nearly 50 people came to the border, the zero point, for the first time last year to light the candles since independence six decades ago.
Again, the reliefs put up at the border distort facts. Whatever brutalities shown happened on both sides. Hindus and Sikhs were victims in Pakistan and Muslims in India. It was the same sordid spectacle in the newly-born countries, neither less in brutality nor more in compassion. Women and children were the main targets.
If someone were to tell me that Hinduism is greater in generosity or that Islam emits more love, I would beg to differ. I saw the followers of the two religions killing in the name of faith. They were raising slogans of both “Har Har Mahadev” and “Ya Ali” while piercing swords or spears into one another. Some incidents were captured in the books which were published at that time. Aur insan mar gaya is the famous book by Ramanand Sagar and the short story Peshawar Express by the eminent Urdu writer Krishan Chander, to narrate events of how man dies when the Satan in him awakens. Then there are Sadaat Hasan Manto’s short stories in Urdu that tell how the two communities touched the depth of crime and callousness.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 15th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (46)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Grace: Please think again before commenting... Why you didn't get a single recommendation ?
@a_wr: Some said only for you "Ignorance is bliss"
@Anubhav Wadhwa: I agree with you and always wonder as to why God after passing instructions in Latin, Hebrew, Sanskrit and Arabic stopped passing instructions at all. This too he did thousands of years before. Due to the brain given by him the human being has changed his surrounding so much so, why does he not feel the necessity of coming again and revising those old instructions. He must use modern languages and gadgets like internet etc directly so we do not have to rush to priests maulvis pundits etc for interpretations. These interpretations and exclusive rights of interpretation to some, is devastating with blood shed the beautiful universe created by HIM. I also feel with modern communications he can easily travel to earth and appear more often to show us the way rather leaving his loved human race in confusion all the time. What say you. Regards. all are invited to enlighten me with your wisdom please.
Mr. Nayar : You get it all wrong; it is not 'The tragedy of partition'. It is the 'gift of partition'. Hope you could figure this out in your golden years of life
@Imran: "Living life as a minority in India is really tough especially if you are a Muslim. " Wonder if you have spoken to your shia friends lately. Assuming you have some. (Of course I dont expect ET to publish this... but Ive stated my point)
I cannot believe how on earth can people be so cruel! the kind of killing, tortures and rapes that happened during partition makes me feel ashamed to call myself an Indian/Pakistani or Hindu/Muslim. I still cannot fathom how can we live with so much of hate against people who don't follow our philosophy of life? I feel terrified whenever Independence day comes! what cost we had paid for it and how we reacted once we got it? The time that should have been celebrated by all of us; in-fact, became one of the most horrendous periods in the history of sub-continent.
@Waleed Khan: You will curse Nehru and Indians will curse Jinnah (for obvious reasons coz the stories being told on either side of the border are quite different). But the fact is that it was not Jinnah or Nehru who divided us, it was the hatred and intolerance that we had in our hearts for each others that lead to the bloodiest partition ever in the history of world. Two men could not have divided the nation had her denizens not wanted it to happen.
I still see lots of people hating others because they do not belong to their religion. I still see people talking bad about other religions and not being able to take it back from someone else. I still see the bitterness in the relations of people from different communities. Seems like we have not learned a lesson from our mistakes.
All religions are nothing else but philosophies, they started way back and some books were written to dictate does and don'ts that suite the contemporary period. This is 20th century we are talking (the India-Pakistan partition) and the time changed, but we never learned that an alternate way of life could also exists. we never learned to respect others' faith. If we could learn to respect people for what they are and not for the religion they belongs to, this world truly would be a wonderful place to live-in.This is 21st century we certainly need to change for better. Lots of things to ponder-upon, if we still can't figure out this issue I can see a very dangerous future ahead.
All those who have ridiculed the very well expressed article "Am I Pakistani, or am I Indian? By Zuha SiddiquiPublished: August 15, 2014" I request them to read this article very very carefully. Regards.
@globalobserver: Very well presented. Thanks.......... VINOD
@Grace Baloch have Iraninan, Pakhtun have Afghani and people near Indus river have Indian identity. What do you mean by native Pakistani ? You have influence by three cultures, but I bet you dont want to be called Either Iranian, or Afghani or Indian. May be you like to be called Arabian. but facts cant be changed.
@Salim: Difficult to understand what you want to say. It is not lack of Muslims that has made India progress at a faster clip than Bangladesh or Pakistan, in fact India has more Muslims than Pakistan and almost the same as Bangladesh. The Muslims of India are as patriotic as others and equal contributors in making India what it is. They are equal lovers of democracy and reject any other form of government. The proof is in the pudding because only 10% of Muslims in today's Indian territory supported the idea of Pakistan or Partition, even lesser number moved to the new country in 1947. If they thought they had made a wrong choice there would have been a rush to emigrate, like the Hindus of Pakistan are trying to do.
Here's a new perspective on the Partition riots in the Eastern part of Punjab. This is an article in The News Minute http://bit.ly/1rbmmPn in which the starting paragraphs are interesting. It seems there were cynics in powerful places all across the board. In Britain, in Congress and in the Muslim League. Their cold calculations resulted in so many deaths.
@Salim: You are right that TNT is a global theory now. As the Indian Muslims population has grown Indians do feel that democracy and secularism can be in danger as significant percentage of Muslims want sharia in India. Indian Muslims will be tested in next 5 yrs. In all the forced conversion cases in India culprits are Muslims. I thank Jinnah for partition and personally believe that he was true son of India and deserved Noble Prize for peace. Only secular Muslims I see are in Bollywood.
@Waleed Khan (Mardan):
Why don't you try a few of those options(the last one being the product of your imagination).
Cabinet Mission Plan said India will be divided into 3 parts, each part having the freedom to go its way after 10 years.
Considering Bangladesh broke away from Pakistan, despite the Religion being the same, there was a good chance this would have happened.
India broke into 3 in 1947, but we got Kashmir, Calcutta, large chunks of Punjab, Himachal, Assam. Had Nehru accepted CMP India would be half the size it is today.
Nehru was a wise man, under whom India got equal rights for all. Even Muslims today vote for his grandchildren because of the gratitude they feel.
In the game of Poker Nehru called Jinnah's bluff and got away with a continous, large chunk of land, with majority Hindu population. We all know the status of many Muslim majority countries in the world. India is not counted among them today, thanks to Nehru and Jinnah for forcing Nehru to discard the CMP.
@Indian Muslim: Have you forgotten that this article is by an Indian. Majority of Pakistanis have moved on. It's only Karachi people who moved from India and have relatives in India who worry about partition. The truth is that most native Pakistani people think of themselves as superior to Indians in terms of culture, looks etc. This may be superficial and mean but it is the truth. Ask people in Punjab, KPK, Kashmir etc about them wanting to be with Indians in a country - the answer will always be no since they would say in history we were also part of Persia or Afghanistan so why should we be stuck with India and Sri Lanka. Indian Muslims have the same history and culture as Indians but native Pakistanis do not have same things.
When rest of the world such as China, Russia, Thailand, Mayanmar and even African countries and America are fighting Muslims. They do not want Muslims among them. Kaide Azam also said Hindu & Muslims are different nation and cannot live together, why does Nayyar asks for union of India and Pakistan. We Pakistanis need to accept the fact that by not having Muslims from Pakistan and Bangladesh Indians have progressed so much even after opposition from America and China. India withstood American subversive tactics and has manged to stay together and kept democracy alive. Their democracy may not be ideal but if they had large Muslim population, democracy would not survived.
@ Spot On Mr. Ahmed Qureshi - We have a Winner. I did not see a single article in Indian newspapers, blog, talk shows on Partition, every body is talking about future. Pakistani Muslims after 67 years still wondering whose there daddy? Is it Arabs, Turks, persian or Indians in Lucknow or Hyderabad, where there family lives? May in a decade we will articles on how forefathers came from China.
@IMRAN KHAN: You hit the nail on the head. Punjabis on both sides must explain. Nayyar saheb , a Punjabi himself has little to say. Depravity is the word that applies to the noble Punjabis. And there is no end to the claims of superiority of Punjabis ever after.
This account is fabricated and false. Only about 10-15% of Indian muslims migrated to Pakistan.
In contrast , because of violence against Hindus and non-action by the government, 85% of Hindus and Sikhs either migrated , killed or converted. This was all across Pakistan from Punjab to Singh to NWFP.
Hindus and Sikhs , who were 22% of W Pakistan population ( and 30% of E pakistan ) , are now 1% in W Pakistan while muslims in contrast have doubles in percentage terms ( from 8% to 16% ) and increased 5 times in numbers ( from 35 million to 175 million ) in last 70 years.
Pakistanis and muslims should appreciate that what happened to Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan did not happen to overwhelming majority of muslims in India. Numbers tell the story in startling terms.
@Waleed Khan (Mardan): I don't consider Gandhi as a completely wise man who took all right decisions. Nehru was correct in rejecting all 3 options. We can't have voter electoral weightage on religion basis. Period. Then the meaning of secularism is gone and it is not true democracy. Gandhi was earratic in asking Nehru to vacate PM position for Jinnah which Nehru agreed but he did not agree to other Jinnah conditions. Similarly Gandhi asked Sardar Patel to step aside in favor of Nehru because Nehru was more vocal. Jinnah was a bad politician and I am glad his proposals were rejected by Nehru. INdia would have been today's Pakistan. I would not have felt proud to call India my home had that happened.
@karachi mirchi It is not at all surprising Pakistanis like Kuldip Nayyar' s writings.!!! He perpetuates myths/lies deeply cherished by Pakistaniat:-) He wildly exaggerates majoritarianism in India while being pretty much silent on the third class citizenship and fear in which minuscule number of minorities live in Pakistan.
Indian Muslims population has gone up because Indian government never took liaquat nehru pact seriously which asked for same treatment of minorities in all the countries. Had India done so population of muslims would be around 5% of total. Partition would have happened even after independence. Why blame Muslims only, even dalits including Ambedkar wrote in favour of it? Even after 68yrs of independence India couldn't able to become a secular state because of continuous opposition from Muslims. Why I dont see the same articles from India about Burma? Question should not be that why partition happened or why Indian Muslims voted for it, it should why after creation Indian Muslims were not allow to move to Pakistan by Nehru and Gandhi?
Brother, get on with your life and forget the nostalgia. What happened in the past is history, what happens in the future is for us to create. The two countries created do not share much in common except some history, where they want to go are divergent paths and both countries and their citizens know it. As long as the two countries do not interfere in the affairs of the other peace will prevail, if any country tries to change its geographic borders through belligerent action, trouble will follow. What is clearly visible to me in India is the diminishing appetite for violence directed at it, more so when sponsored from foreign lands. If it does not stop, India may have to act the way it does not like to, does not want to, but has to. It will be very unfortunate if things come to such a sad pass.
Opening sentence says........as old as fifty seven years........should be 67 years.
I wish someone would take a picture of that billboard mentioned in the article.
Cabinet Mission Plan, in retrospect, appears to have been the best option scuttled because of Nehru's intransigence. It would have saved the bloodshed and moreover, it would have further allowed Pakistan and Bangladesh to own the goodwill of the word 'India' which has a 5000 years history - something which has by default gone in favor of the present day India only.
@gp65: I seem to agree with you. I can give you an accurate answer, but know it will not be printed.
@ Nayyar, it is BORING to see your face always asking for unity between India and Pakistan. 99% of India is living peacefully with itself and also not interested with uniting with Pakistan. It is better for us to live as we are now. If opportunity we can do business other wise no need. We should avoid making people struggle by getting the two to get in to relationships, this would be only personal struggles always. Like you are struggling to know your identity.
In present situation, NOBODY in India feels Partition was a TRAGEDY.
My suggestion write something which is useful to the present, especially about this topic.
Mr.Magyar belongs to a bygone era. Citizens of young India revere Mr.Jinnah for creating Pakistan. The title for us will read The Gift of Partition.
@IMRAN KHAN:
Yes the same question disturbs me. Regions whether muslim majority areas or hindu majority ones faced problems but nowhere it was so serious as in both wings of Punjab whether East or West. I am not aware of Indian Punjab but even in today's Pakistan anti India feelings are very strong in Punjab and KP. They are not so severe in Sindh or Baluchistan. Here I am talking of local people not Urdu speaking immigrants. Problems of that magnitude did not occur in Bengal which was also divided. Did Punjab lie in the traditional route of Muslim invasion caused the problem or was the existence of a third party (Sikhs) complicated the situation or something else. Can some social scientist throw some light. Also what was Hindu, Muslim and Sikh relations in the Punjab in the 30's and 40's.
We wanted a separate country and got it. Get over it!
@Fahad Bashir:
"The Muslims of undivided India had serious and well reasoned reservations regarding the majority Hindu population at the time of the Independence."
Apparently they were wrong. Today, there are more Muslims in India than Pakistan and their numbers as percentage of the total population has gone up since 1947. In comparison, the 25% non-Muslim population in Pakistan soon after the partition, has now shrunk to 3%. Karchi was had 51% Hindus!
As a Muslim immigrant from India who immigrated in the 70s, all I can say is THANK GOD for this partition. Living life as a minority in India is really tough especially if you are a Muslim.
There are just too many articles on partition, either for it or against it, in the Pakistani media. I read Indian newspapers too, but it seems India has moved on, while Pakistani's are still trying to find a reason for their existence and vehemently defending the TNT. It seems India has been the winner here. Just move on, for God's sake.
@Waleed Khan (Mardan):
"Nehru had pushed Muslims to the wall. We had no choice but to break away. How could we be a part of India when the power was with a man like Nehru. He was foolhardy and ignorant."
I think you need to get past the concocted history taught in Pakistan Studies. Nehru did not "push Muslims to the wall" as you claim. Nehru was a proponent of one-man one equal vote democracy, secularism and equality of all citizen. The Muslim leaguers wanted more power than their numbers would give them.
As for the rest of your comment, it was fine for Muslims to be part of India for over eight centuries when their minority regimes ruled over the Hindus but you have a problem being part of a secular democratic country where everyone would be equal?
As for Nehru being foolhardy and ignorant, look in the mirror yourself for not striving to get learn the truth and facts from sources other than Pakistan studies.
sir one third was still a minority... we r so happy here to be in majority atleast...
Like many I wish to see peace between India and Pakistan but I have no nostalgia for the undivided British colony of India. You of all people should understand that the land of Pakistan has been part of many Empires and nations before. For example Sialkot was called Sakala when it was a prominent city in the Greek Empire and Menander was a great Greek King of Sialkot. When Sialkot was part of the Persian Empire or Afghan Empire too people would have lived together with others but I don't think people are nostalgic for Persian, Greek, Afghan, Mughal or British rule. You may have your own demons to work out from partition but understand that Pakistanis, especially sons and daughters of the soil do not identify with India nor bought into the idea of British India as a nation. Yes there is nostalgia among the Muhajir community in Karachi who originate from India but my native grandparents never lamented partition - only the senseless loss of life and the machinations of the British against the people of Pakistan. I have several Indian friends and we respect each other and our differences - even my Indian Muslim friends are happy to be Indian and I respect that they are closer to their Hindu and Sikh compatriots in India than to me. I would never assume to see a nation combining Indian, Sri Lankan, Pakistani, Burmese Muslims. Peace by all means and friendship by all means but do not assume that people are going to give up their history or belonging to the British creation of India.
As a Pakistani, not one word in the article I can disagree with.
The carvings put up by the Pakistanis is just a symptom that has inflicted the ruling class (i.e., Pakistani military) for a long time. They have always believed that Muslims are superior to Hindus. They have included this even in the school curriculum. Heck, their misadventures in 1948, 1965, 1971 and Kargil were nothing but based on the foundation of this thinking that Muslim soldiers are better than Hindu soldiers. For whatever reason, Indira Gandhi did not play a strong hand in the Simla summit even though the Pakistani forces surrendered in a humiliating manner. Maybe, it is time for another comprehensive rout of the Pakistani military at the hands of Indian military. Only then will they go back to barracks and let normal relations between India, Pakistan and Afghanistan prevail. 'Coz right now, any peace in the region is detriment to the health and interests of Pakistani military. They have shown no inclination to strengthen Pakistanis and are content as long as they have a free reign to continue with their nefarious shenanigans.
I can't argue with the fact that what happened after Partition was a tragedy but I would strongly argue against the fact of Partition being the tragedy itself.
There is a belief held by some scholars that the partition of India was the sole cause of the massacre that followed. However, the rifts between Muslims and Hindus in the sub-continent are older and have deeper roots. The Muslims of undivided India had serious and well reasoned reservations regarding the majority Hindu population at the time of the Independence. If it had not been the Partition, it would have been another event after the Independence. It is interesting to note that the Muslim League did not win the elections held under British rule as late as 1939. However, when Muslims saw themselves being marginalized as a result of these elections that they overwhelmingly decided in favor of a separate state.
My grandfather and grandmother both lost their brothers and sisters during migration to Pakistan. I once questioned them about it. My grandfather was a leather merchant. He had traveled to various parts of India in his younger days. He told me he would have sacrificed his life a thousand times over for the creation of Pakistan. He said, "The Hindus and Muslims were never one nation. Before, there wasn't the bloodshed that we saw during partition, but we knew the bias they had in their hearts. We knew for sure that were we placed under the Hindus, it would have resulted in a bigger tragedy. They would still have killed us and then we would have had nowhere to go."
"If someone were to tell me that Hinduism is greater in generosity or that Islam emits more love, I would beg to differ. I saw the followers of the two religions killing in the name of faith. They were raising slogans of both “Har Har Mahadev” and “Ya Ali” while piercing swords or spears into one another."
It is possible that cruelty and violence prevailed in equal measure during a very painful time for the country. The reality is though that in Hindu majjority India, Muslims have flourished in every single field while in Muslim majority Pakistan, Hindus have been wiped out.
"Imagine the influence that their numbers — their votes — could have commanded in the undivided subcontinent! They would have been nearly one-third of the total population."
Thank Jinnah for that..Or else we would have seen the 40% muslims controlling the entire parliament along with votebank hogging pseudosecular,bringing Sharia law and blasphemy law in the constitution,riots at the slightest expense. RSS would have become a terrorist organization,no foreign country would have invested looking at the volatile environment.
Partition was like the removal of a gangene infested limb to save your life
I am a student of history and I read much about the partition of India. One thing I cannot find an answer "why most brutal and barbaric incidents occurred in Central Punjab?", India was and still so big a country and always considered as a sub-continent, my question is still to be answered.
hope the peace prevails !!!
Hello Sir ji, leave the past behind. It's been more than 6 decades. Kab takh wahi atke rahoge. Pakistan ka toh pata nahin but we are glad Jinnah helped us in getting rid of so many maniacs. Special thanks to "SIR" Jinnah hainji. Happy 15th of August to you TiffinBox and to more than a billion Indians in India and around the globe.
Nehru had pushed Muslims to the wall. We had no choice but to break away. How could we be a part of India when the power was with a man like Nehru. He was foolhardy and ignorant. He was too keen being Prime Minister over the protection of 15 million possible refugees. Jinnah and Gandhi had given him several prepositions, but he was too ignorant to accept them. He didn't want to negotiate to make India united, he wanted everything to go his way. Gandhiji and Jinnah had given him 3 deals. 1: Jinnah would be the first PM and would name his cabinet. 2: Nehru could be PM, but there would be more power with the provinces then normal and that the North West of India would be one province. 3: Nehru could be PM, but there would be a religious quota for PMs; out of 10, 6 would be Hindu, 3 Muslim and the other Sikh or other. Nehru rejected all three he was an idiot.