In Syria, there is close to being a bloody stalemate. The various opposition forces do not have the individual or collective strength to bring down the Asad regime, and the old dictator is still sufficiently in power to hold them at bay.
Just across the metaphorical road geographically the Israelis and the Palestinians are intent on grinding each other into mincemeat and in Ukraine there brews who knows what as Russia reasserts itself in a post-Soviet world.
Latent conflicts reveal themselves as disputes over who controls vast swathes of ocean beneath which lie valuable mineral resources, and again with an eye to minerals Antarctica is going to find its non-militarised status at risk.
Europe is, more or less, free of conflict as are North and South America, but Africa is still fighting the post-colonial wars that have done so much to impede growth and development in many African states for the past forty years.
War is with us in abundance. And 2014 is the hundred-year anniversary of the start of World War 1, which at its close in 1918 had claimed a total of 37 million casualties, 16 million of them dead. Six million simply vanished without trace in the conflict that was dubbed ‘The War to End all Wars’ — and clearly did not.
This year is also the 70th anniversary of D-Day, when the allies landed in France and started to roll back the Third Reich of Adolph Hitler. As the allies advanced from the west so Russia advanced from the east and in doing so laid the foundations for what quickly became the Cold War, a form of conflict that itself gave birth to that uniquely mad acronym — MAD or Mutually Assured Destruction.
Pakistan is a state conceived and born in conflict, and there are still those alive this Independence Day that remember the bloody partition, my own father-in-law among them. Now approaching his own century, his memory of that time is still clear, or so he would like us all to think. We are several years into taking from him, in Seraiki, an oral history. Telling the tales of old where fact and fiction are indistinguishable, but with a few fixed historical points to hold it all together. Just.
Conflict has attended every stage of our national development and our own very cold war freezes on in the Kargil fight, and this Independence Day itself has been usurped by political turmoil that has the capacity to turn very ugly indeed. There may be dead and wounded by the morning of the 15th August, recriminations, fingers pointed and blame allocated.
World War 1 was triggered by the shooting dead of Archduke Franz Ferdinand (and his wife Sophie, it is often forgotten) by Gavrilo Princip. He was below the age at which the Hapsburg Empire permitted the death penalty, and died in prison a few months before the end of The War To End All wars in 1918.
No leader of Pakistan is ever likely to make a public journey in an open carriage as did Archduke Franz Ferdinand, in large part because there are any number of wild and disaffected Gavrilo Princips with a ready supply of pistols to hand. The lesson of the end of Benazir Bhutto is one that is unlikely to fade any time soon.
The place where parades used to be held in Islamabad has long been grassed over, and there will be no marching there, no bands, no waving national flags. No celebration.
Eternal conflict has finally overrun the day which the majority of Pakistan’s people could celebrate together, in unity, free of the petty squabbles of politics. Happy Independence Day, Dear Reader.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 15th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Gilla Butt:
India was certainly mature enough. I don't want to comment on other countries, but India is self sufficient, poverty rate has come down from 80% to around 20%, literacy is the highest ever since Independence, we have been a democracy since birth, no dictators, no military takeovers. We are a well respected nation.
Please so not generalise Pakistanis issues with Indian ones.
@BruteForce: There was no need to make Pakistan or India The population was not mature enough and nothing good has comeout of this so called "Independence " .I think all politicians were power hungry miscreants ..who cared a lot less for the population of India than their own fame and fortune .
@vinsin:
Whoever did joined the Congress. Azad did fight the Imperial Yoke.
My point was, none from the Muslim League(which actually merged with a Feudal Party - Unionist Party), especially the top hierarchy - the top 3 - actually struggled against the British.
Jinnah never spent a day in jail, nor did he sat on any hunger strike. Yet, he is called a Freedom Fighter in Pakistan. Strange. People like @sabi tell us that only bad people go to jail, suggesting Gandhi was a bad guy. Point out that even Mandela went to jail to fight for his rights, they usually not reply.
@sabi:
Mahatma Gandhi has a chapter in all the secular schools all over the world, especially the West, for his path of non-violence. He was jailed for non-cooperation, taking Dharnas, for making Salt, for basically breaking the occupier's unjust law, where making your own salt was a crime.
Nehru and Gandhi sat on hunger strikes(if you can read up, to stop the Direct Action day killings started by you know who..)
They went to jail because they were right. They wanted freedom for Indians, for the British to go away.
Nelson Mandela too was in prison, was he a violent person?
The only people who didn't go to jail were those who were on good terms with the colonials.
Don't you agree with this statement?
Are you calling Mandela and Gandhi, people who stayed years behind bars, criminals?
You got this one wrong mate, its Israel that is grinding the Palestinians not both grinding each other. Try and keep your bias to yourself.
@BruteForce: Hindu leaders spent many years in jail for their strggle for independence as you say it my question is why they went to jail if they were peacefull people or to say non violent ? Also why Muslim league top leadership were not sent to jail despite being violent on many occasion for example 'direct action day'.?
@BruteForce: Majority of the Muslims didnt take part in Indian freedom struggle, merely 1.6% did or supported the idea even. Muslims were supporting British Raj and independence means freedom from Hindu Raj as defined by Jinnah. Indian Muslims got too much in comparison to their contribution.
https://sites.google.com/site/cabinetmissionplan/mountbatten-and-jinnah-negotiations-on-pakistan-april-
Firstly, Technically speaking Pakistan was BORN on Aug 14, not gain Independence. So, Pakistanis are celebrating the wrong occasion year after year. How can it be Pakistan's Independence when it was even a Nation State before 1947?
If you follow the logic that Pakistan was India before 1947, then you should celebrate India's Independence.
Also, lets not forget Bangladesh is the real Pakistan which was born that day, simply because Bengalis were more in number and the Direct Action day which gave birth to Pakistan, took place in Bengal.
Second, no Pakistani leader, especially the top 3 in the Muslim League, fought for Independence. Jinnah never spent a day in jail, neither did Liaquat Ali Khan. Neither did walk on the streets of India, asking for Independence from the British.
So, if Pakistan truly celebrating its Independence from the British, shouldn't it be glorifying Nehru and Gandhi, who spent 9 and 11 years of their lives in British jails?