The United States does not consider Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s August 14 long march as a ‘destabilising event’ but wants its aim should not be to topple the government.
“It seems to me that the march is not something that anyone should fear. It is not a destabilising event. In a stable democracy, it is appropriate for there to be all kinds of expression of views,” said Ambassador Beth Jones, the US deputy special representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan.
In an exclusive interview with The Express Tribune, she, however, added that the PTI long march should not be violent and it should not aim to unsettle the government. “To express views, yes. But anything more than that is not appropriate,” said Jones, who on Wednesday wrapped up a five-day trip to Islamabad, where she met with Pakistani officials.
This was the first time a senior US official publicly commented on the brewing tensions between the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government and the opposition party of cricketer-turned politician Imran Khan.
The PTI has planned to stage a massive gathering on Independence Day against alleged rigging in last year’s elections. In an attempt to thwart its plans, the government intends to hold the annual Independence Day celebrations on the same venue in a move that may lead to political instability.
The US envoy said it was important for Pakistan to have a “vibrant functioning democracy in which Pakistani citizens have their say in a peaceful and constructive way”.
Waziristan operation
Ambassador Jones said the United States was fully supporting Pakistan to go after every terrorist group in its ongoing operation in North Waziristan Agency. “We have made it clear that we completely support Pakistani intentions to go after terrorist groups of every nationality, including if it is a Pakistani terrorist group, Uzbek terrorist group, Chinese terrorist group, Afghan terrorist group… whatever it is, it has no place on Pakistani territory,” she said.
She added that the Pakistani leadership has given assurances that the operation would not spare any terrorist.
Asked whether the US was convinced that Pakistan was also targeting the Haqqani Network, she said: “I think it is still early days. I cannot tell you one way or the other what’s happened, I don’t know, we are not
there.” However, she insisted it was important that there should be no possibility of militant outfits’ regrouping on the Pakistani soil after the operation.
Answering a question, Ambassador Jones said the Afghanistan government as well as the US-led international forces had the intention not to allow Afghan soil to be used by any terrorist group either. “One of the things the Afghan side and Pakistan side have been working on and we have been supporting is to establish good border control and cross-border communications so that if this group or that group tries to take sanctuary elsewhere in either territory that can be communicated and followed up,” she added.
Support for Afghan peace deal
About the possibility of a peace deal following the formation of a new government in Kabul, Jones said it was for the new Afghan administration how to reach out to the Taliban for reconciliation.
“We made it clear that eventually some kind of reconciliation process was appropriated but it should be Afghan-to-Afghan. The US would be supportive of that process but would not be part of it,” she emphasised.
She also acknowledged the role of Pakistan in peace and stability in Afghanistan but stressed the need for letting Afghans decide on the peace talks with the Taliban.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 17th, 2014.
COMMENTS (16)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
On a separate note, Ambassador Beth bears an uncanny resemblance to BBC's senior correspondent Lyse Doucet.
@Imran Qadri:
Rubbish - she is simply saying that everyone has a right to peacefully express their views - it's called "freedom of speech" and is enshrined in the Constitution of the USA. If that's not in your Constitution then you should consider adding it.
Either she is inexperienced or she is intentionally being insensitive to voters of ruling party by giving statement in support of opposition party's unfair demands.
Rather then meddling in others affairs she should first check out her own back yard!
US presidential elections of 2000 had a very very close finish.Al Gore put his foot down and demanded hand recounts in four counties of key state Florida. US supereme court in a 7-2 judgement later ruled state-wide recount of ballots as unconstitutional and declared Bush as winner.
NOW imagine.. If other world power like Russia would have given statement in favour of Al Gore saying that gross injustice was done with Al Gore and US judicial system and electoral system were being unfair with Al Gore then how would US and its people have reacted..?
Here Imran wasn't even a close 2nd, he ended up being 3rd,even if all 4 seats that he is demanding recount in and all other election appeals filed by his candidates in election tribunals are declared in his favour even then he has no chance of become PM.
He has to come to term with reality that just 2 years back his party wasn't good enough to even win 2 seats,he should be grateful to former spy master for whatever seats he managed to get in assemblies and should learn to live with them instead of whining and dragging his feet.
Asked whether the US was convinced that Pakistan was also targeting the Haqqani Network, she said: “I think it is still early days. I cannot tell you one way or the other . USA doesn't give much credence to what Pakistan says and will judge Pakistan on what it actually does. Unfortunately 3 weeks into the offensive and Pakistan apparently still can't locate the Haqqani - tells you something. Saying that the Haqqani are a target is different than actually targeting them.
I quote below the diplomatic protocol which prohibits intereference in internal affairs of a country. Will Pakistan Foreign Office lodge a protest with Washington? I quote below extract from Diplomatic Protocol which is agreed by all nations and states. Diplomatic agents and members of their families enjoy, in the receiving state, privileges and immunities accorded to them under international law and the legislation of the receiving state. At the same time, they are all bound to respect the laws and administrative regulations, as well as the tradition and customs of the receiving state, and they should refrain from any acts “which might be construed as interfering in the internal affairs of the receiving state”.http://www.mfa.gov.rs/en/embassies/dipl-protocol
Madam Ambassador,
Your Statement is regarded as interfearance in the domestic politics of a country; this is not permitted in international diplomacy. Besides, it is not freedom of expression either, but considered in developed democracies as the direct democracy of the people which gets invoked when the parliament proves itself disable to debate National issues because of the ruling majority. But then you would'nt know this since in the USA their is not the parliamentry democracy.
Rex Minor
PML N government in jeopardy!
Stop meddling in other sovereign nation's political affairs! US considers it its right to poke nose in others internal matters.
Would sane citizen of US or US govt tolerate if US presidential election 2012's runner-up Mitt Romney start whining 2 years after US election and start creating chaos and mayhem on streets of Washington and start disrupting lives of millions of DC residents?
Mind you,PTI was'nt able to even secure second place,it stood 3rd during 2013 elections so there was no chance that Imran could have been PM even if all the election results appeals filed by PTI were decided in their favour.
The phrase "Freedom of expression" is highly subjective and annotates with "country's interest"
i question is why ET ask this Question to Ambassador Beth Jones? she is not part of Federal Govt nor she has the right to comment on it
@Indian: Yeah man... you are absolutely right and your this opnion is equally applicable to US and UK interference in Palestine to create Isreal by force.
The nod!
@Omar Aziz: She is entitled to her opinion. Why people interfere in palestine issue?
One who wears the shoe knows where it pinches. Do not interfere in other’s affairs.