Hague said he had spoken to Indian Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj about the contract in which the British-backed Eurofighter lost out to the French-made Rafale plane for exclusive negotiations.
Dassault won the right in 2012 to enter exclusive negotiations with India to supply 126 fighters after lodging a lower bid than its rival Eurofighter for a tender with an estimated value of $12 billion.
Those negotiations have since been delayed and must now be taken up by the new government in office since May.
"There is a preferred bidder as you know. Of course we have always had a strong belief in the capabilities of the Eurofighter and its potential," Hague told reporters, saying the deal was among other defence issues he discussed with Swaraj.
"It is always available to those countries that are able and willing to purchase it," he said.
British Finance Minister George Osborne, who accompanied Hague, announced he had offered the Indian government a one-billion-pound ($1.7 billion) credit line which could be used to buy infrastructure-related equipment.
"It's a very substantial commitment to the new government's programme of infrastructure investment," Osborne told reporters.
The two ministers were on a two-day trip to Mumbai and Delhi to meet the new government of right-wing Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Indian defence procurement has traditionally been an opaque business, marred by postponements and repeated re-negotiations over cost.
The tender for the 126 multi-role combat aircraft already has a history of delays.
Originally slated for 2005, the procurement process was only cleared in 2007 and flight evaluations of the initial six proposals did not begin until two years later.
And Dassault's record in exporting the Rafale is a troubled one. It has come close to selling the aircraft to Brazil and Switzerland, but failed to secure a contract.
Analysts have said that as the discussions on the Rafale deal proceed, Eurofighter is likely to remain a conspicuous offstage presence, ready to jump in at the first sign of trouble.
COMMENTS (15)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Aseem:
I think France agreed to transfer technology. India wants France to take responsibility for the quality of Rafale planes manufactured by Indians in India. France doesn't want to. That seems to be the issue.
@WB:
Yes, you are correct. I was also surprised to see that photo. Some people may try to downplay by saying it is just a painting; that would be playing dirty, according to me.
i think we must consider EuroFighter Typhoon as most of the country are buyinng Typhoon in place of Rafale. after all rafale has 0 export. Qatar, Brazil, Canada, UAE, South Korea every one rejected Rafale and choose Either Eurofighter Typhoon or Saab Grippen ( cheaper option perfect for india ). say byee byee to french rafale. this rafale( decade old ) fighter is going to cost us 20 billion ( cost of the fighter )+ 20 billion (maintanance )= 40 billion throughtout next 20 years. They are not even ready to make full Technology transefer and key component like AESA radar. UPA made all worst decision by selecting rafale inplace of grippen or typhoon. MOD plz reconsider grippen or typhoon.
@taz: Its hardly any news. India decided to buy Dassault Rafale as it quoted lower but india and france has not been able to reach an agreement as perhaps india wants technology transfer. if that does not happen or gets delayed the option of eurofighter typhoon is always there... thats what the british minister must have referred.
The models of eurofighter, dassault and Tejas look similar and all are 4.5 generation machines but the delay in Tejas is forcing India to buy these. Also Sukhoi 30 MKI which India manufactures under the license from Russia is of the same class but its just for the variety that india is purchasing else by the time these fighters will be delivered to india, the 5th gen stealth Sukhoi PAK-FA of Indo-Russian JV will be ready.
As regards to India's defence budget it is less than 2% of her GDP as against Pakistan's defence budget that is 3.4% of your GDP, so not a problem. As compared to China, Indian budget is peanuts.
@taz: And I wonder why you want them - so you can wonder why they appear? About "such news" by the way, as a passive player yourself what comments do you want? Tell us, so we can fulfill your dreams.
@junaid: Who or what is stopping you from increasing your defence budget ?
@junaid:
"And we complain why we increase our defence budget"
No one is stopping Pakistan from increasing its defense spending.
Pakistan needs to increase its defense spending by a factor of 5-10 to stay in balance with India. But to do this kind of an increase that is needed, Pakistan would have to borrow hard currency from abroad. This would shoot Pakistan's external debt from the current $65B to over $300B. Pakistan can't even pay the interest on the current debt let alone on such a massive new debt..
For Britishers without touching indo-pak colonial history their country will be small island nation ,thats why then and there they have majuboori to thouch it like pickle to their food whithout that, their food wont be sweet. our indo-apk leaders also behave lke stenographers then and there they will go to london and ask "Her majesty how we have to rule our country" like that. what a shame.
@taz: we are here. we have no problem with this news. we need it according to time. but we have more interesting things happening in India. so not interested in commenting on each and every news.
@taz
"and i wonder where do all the indians and indian lovers disappear when it comes to such news.."
Um, why? Do you think countries trying to sell India their best hardware is something Indians will be angry about? Why do they have to hide about this news then?
Haha, unbelievable, he even go voted up for that comment.
@junaid: For a change Pakistan can formulate policies of it's own without being Indiacenteric. An arms race has consumed Pakistan.
Has anyone noticed the photo in the background, things of that nature used to be absent in the last regime.
@junaid: Increasing defence budget without improving the economy is stupid really. India has a growing economy that can afford to increase their defence spending. Our economy on the other hand is stagnant and we have much more pressing issues than increasing our defence spending.
and i wonder where do all the indians and indian lovers disappear when it comes to such news..
And we complain why we increase our defence budget